search for: modularize

> >> Maybe it's not a standard ethernet-to-UPS cable? > > That's Ben's point - either it is actual Ethernet (usually found on an add-on UPS SNMP monitoring card, where the jack typically has two status LEDs, one on either side of the notch for the modular plug tab) that needs to go to another Ethernet jack on a NIC or a switch, or it is a proprietary APC cable that

hello, i wonder what command should i used in R to do the modular. right now i have a vector v <- c(3, 4, 5, 6), but i have tried v%2 or v mod 2 or mod(v, 2) or modular(v, 2), and none of these works. Also, how can i find more function command online, i have to search in the mailing list questions, but it is not enough, is that a better website i can search more about R online. Thank you

Hi, I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big picture somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM packages at all. I mean, is there anything inside a RPM package which says it belongs to a module or it has a special function in a module? >From what I understand the RPMs are just

> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big >> picture >> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. >> >> What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM >> packages at all. I mean, is there anything inside a RPM package

On 3/30/2017 9:03 PM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Edward Diener via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Actually just doing: > > clang++ -c t.cpp -o t.o --target=x86_64-windows-msvc -fmsc-version=1900 > clang++ t.o -o t.exe --target=x86_64-windows-msvc

The virtio configuration options are inconsistent. According to this, every options that needs virtio will select it: # Virtio always gets selected by whoever wants it. config VIRTIO tristate Note that it's not user-selectable, so any config file that tries to set it will be ignored when kconfig loads those options. And yet we have a whole set of options that depend on VIRTIO, like

The virtio configuration options are inconsistent. According to this, every options that needs virtio will select it: # Virtio always gets selected by whoever wants it. config VIRTIO tristate Note that it's not user-selectable, so any config file that tries to set it will be ignored when kconfig loads those options. And yet we have a whole set of options that depend on VIRTIO, like

Hello all, I remember and have lost a link to the blog on hints about 37s modularization of basecamp, backpack, etc. Anyone remeber this and can remind me of the link? Thanks ! -- ------------------------------ Forget the icing. Bake the cake! - the epicentered developer ------------------------------ Peter Fitzgibbons -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

I want to find the inverse of an integer k mod p (prime.) Is there a function that can do this for me? I know i could simply write (k^(p-2)) %% p, but i need to do this for large primes (above 100) and this gives the warning message: Warning message: probable complete loss of accuracy in modulus so this method does not work. Any ideas? Thanks, Samuel --

Hi, I know there's been some talk about bignums already, this is similar to it, but not exactly the same. I'm currently using LLVM for my master thesis. The goal is to make a compiler for zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge protocols. This compiler should target embedded devices. There's a language called the protocol implementation language in which these protocols should be

> Am 27.04.20 um 17:31 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS: >>> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big >>>> picture >>>> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. >>>> >>>> What I'm most

I've been playing around with LLVM to write a backend for a rather "simple" (co-)processor. Assume that only three arithmetic instructions exist: ADD mod N, SUB mod N and MUL mod N. The modulus N is programmable and stored in a register. No ordinary arithmetic instructions are available. The word size is 256-bit. In other words, the following function, b + c mod N, corresponds to

On 12/26/18 8:55 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Dec 25, 2018, at 4:07 AM, David Melik wrote: >> Lately I got (used) an APC Back UPS Pro 1000 and Back UPS NS 1080. I got an [8P8C]-to-USB cable from another UPS, but the Pro isn't detected (with usbhid-ups.) I haven't tried the NS yet but it seems to not be on the list though looks just like the Pro. >> > There are a few

Hi, My personal opinion: Just to be sure I understand what you're considering: you want to write a backend that will produce optimized machine code for a device with modular arithmetic instructions (not simulate such a device on a standard CPU)? In which case, won't the same assumptions that are embodied in the transformations for the case of unsigned 2's complement arithmetic (in

Thanks for your insightful suggestions. Yes, I am programming for a real device that does modular arithmetic (and only modular arithmetic). The modulus N is fixed during a single launch of a program. One way I could also come up with is to simply use add i256 %a, %b to represent a + b mod n, and let LLVM passes to reason about possible optimizations. However these are not semantically identical

On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > Hi, > > I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big picture > somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. > > What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM > packages at all. I mean, is there anything inside a RPM package which says > it belongs to a module or

Am 27.04.20 um 17:31 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS: >> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big >>> picture >>> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me. >>> >>> What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence

Hi Keir: It has been brought to my attention that modular oprofile is broken because it now calls get_vm_area which is not an exported function. This appears to be the result of the changeset that removed vm_map_xen_pages which was only used by oprofile. So we either need to export get_vm_area in Xen, or put that function back. What do you think about this? Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:31:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > ext3-journalled-quotas-2.patch > ext3: journalled quota >... This patch broke modular quota: WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.4-mm1/kernel/fs/quota_v2.ko needs unknown symbol mark_info_dirty cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There

Hello, I recently switched from 2.2 to 2.4 kernel. Each partition already contains a journal. I tried kernel-2.4.5-0.2.9 from RedHat Rawhide, where ext3/jbd is modularized. For the people who want to try this kernel, you first need to rebuild it, and enable CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG. This solves an unresolved symbol in jbd.o which prevents ext3 to load. (This issue will be solved in next RawHide) My question is on how to tell the kernel to mount the real root partion as ex...