Chuck Ebbert
2011-Feb-24 16:28 UTC
Can't build in the virtio console driver on x86_64 when the other virtio drivers are modular
The virtio configuration options are inconsistent. According to this,
every options that needs virtio will select it:
# Virtio always gets selected by whoever wants it.
config VIRTIO
tristate
Note that it's not user-selectable, so any config file that tries to
set it will be ignored when kconfig loads those options. And yet we
have a whole set of options that depend on VIRTIO, like VIRTIO_CONSOLE
for example. This makes it impossible to have VIRTIO_PCI modular and
VIRTIO_CONSOLE built-in on x86_64, because:
1. VIRTIO_PCI selects VIRTIO and sets it to M
2. VIRTIO_CONSOLE gets forced to M because one of its dependencies is M
So either VIRTIO (and VIRTIO_RING) need to be user-selectable, or all
of the options that depend on VIRTIO need to be changed to select it
instead.
(For even more fun, LGUEST_GUEST on i386 forces VIRTIO, VIRTIO_RING and
VIRTIO_CONSOLE all to Y.)
Amit Shah
2011-Feb-25 06:08 UTC
Can't build in the virtio console driver on x86_64 when the other virtio drivers are modular
On (Thu) 24 Feb 2011 [11:28:19], Chuck Ebbert wrote:> The virtio configuration options are inconsistent. According to this, > every options that needs virtio will select it: > > # Virtio always gets selected by whoever wants it. > config VIRTIO > tristate > > Note that it's not user-selectable, so any config file that tries to > set it will be ignored when kconfig loads those options. And yet we > have a whole set of options that depend on VIRTIO, like VIRTIO_CONSOLE > for example. This makes it impossible to have VIRTIO_PCI modular and > VIRTIO_CONSOLE built-in on x86_64, because:Any reason to have VIRTIO_PCI modular instead of built in (on x86-64, virtio-console won't work without virtio-pci anyway)? Amit