search for: mnames

hello list! I'm sorry, I just stumbled over this strange behaviour (at least I am not able to explain the behaviour, therefore I assume it to be a strange behaviour): attach(water) # I know, this is not recommended names(water[3:10]) [1] "temp" "pH" "DO" "BOD" "COD" "no3" "no2" "po4" for (i in

Hi R users, I am working with the fda package but when I call the function pca.fd I obtain a message error, which I cann't identify. The error say That : error in assihn(mname,def,where), is not possible to add links to a blockade enviroment. The orther that I'm writting is: > cp1 <- pca.fd(ind.fd1,nharm=3) and before it I can to plot the functional data object ind.fd1. ?Have

...s::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ >> cc <<- cc + 1L >> print(cc) >> if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >> trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ >> str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) >> print(ls()) >> try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) >> })) >> } >> })) >> loadNamespace("oligo") >> >> gives: >> >> Untracing function "conformMethod&q...

...!= "missing") cc <- 0L trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ cc <<- cc + 1L print(cc) if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified untrace(methods::conformMethod) trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) print(ls()) try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) })) } })) loadNamespace("oligo") gives: Untracing function "conformMethod" in package "methods" Tracing function "conformMethod" in pack...

Has anyone gotten one-touch call parking to work on Polycom phones via the Enhanced Feature Keys feature working? I've looked at various examples, they appear correct, but the phones (501, 3.1.x firmware) show the Park button while in a call but this does not actually cause the call to be parked. Doing a SIP debug, I don't see that anything is transmitted as a result of pressing the call

promptClass fails to identify methods associated with the class. Here is a fix: Index: promptClass.R =================================================================== --- promptClass.R (revision 41719) +++ promptClass.R (working copy) @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ if (nmeths > 0) { .meths.body <- " \\describe{" for (i in 1:nmeths) { - .sigmat

...> trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ > cc <<- cc + 1L > print(cc) > if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified > untrace(methods::conformMethod) > trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ > str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) > print(ls()) > try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) > })) > } > })) > loadNamespace("oligo") > > gives: > > Untracing function "conformMethod" in package "methods"...

...>> >> print(cc) >> >> if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified >> >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >> >> trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ >> >> str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) >> >> print(ls()) >> >> try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) >> >> })) >> >> } >> >> })) >> >> loadNamespace("oligo") &gt...

Estimados miembros de la lista. Estoy trabajando con la función mosaic del paquete vcd. Cómo puedo hacer para ver el contenido fe la función y modificar algunos de sus argumentos? Muchas gracias, Manuel -- *Manuel Spínola, Ph.D.* Instituto Internacional en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre Universidad Nacional Apartado 1350-3000 Heredia COSTA RICA mspinola@una.ac.cr

...te({ > >> cc <<- cc + 1L > >> print(cc) > >> if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified > >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) > >> trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ > >> str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) > >> print(ls()) > >> try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) > >> })) > >> } > >> })) > >> loadNamespace("oligo") > >> > >> gives: > >> >...

...ub(" ", "", fstr[[1]][1]) > if (is.null(highlighting) && (!dep %in% c("","Freq"))) { > if (all(varnames == ".")) { > varnames <- if (is.data.frame(data)) > colnames(data) > else > names(dimnames(as.table(data))**) > varnames <- varnames[-which(varnames %in% dep)] > } > > varnames <- c(varnames, dep) > highlighting <- length(varnames) + length(condnames) > } > > > if (inherits(edata, "ftable") || inherits(edata, "table&quo...

Dear R-Helpers, I am not very experienced in using lattice and I am still in the learning stage I have a data set which looks like this: (I have deleted a few lines in order to save space) Chromosome marker Marker.Name Distance 1 1 1 PeMm261 0.0000 2 1 2 Xtxp8 10.1013 .. 20 1 20 EbMi148 210.3099 21 1 21 Xtxp25

...function "table" or "as.data.frame.table" for my class "tfSites". Taking out all the useful code and just returning the input class I get the error setMethod("table", "tfSites", function(.Object) .Object) Error in conformMethod(signature, mnames, fnames, f) : In method for function "table": formal arguments omitted in the method definition cannot be in the signature (exclude = "tfSites") setMethod("as.data.frame.table", "tfSites", function(.Object) .Object ) Error in conformMethod(signa...

...lse NULL dep <- gsub(" ", "", fstr[[1]][1]) if (is.null(highlighting) && (!dep %in% c("","Freq"))) { if (all(varnames == ".")) { varnames <- if (is.data.frame(data)) colnames(data) else names(dimnames(as.table(data))) varnames <- varnames[-which(varnames %in% dep)] } varnames <- c(varnames, dep) highlighting <- length(varnames) + length(condnames) } if (inherits(edata, "ftable") || inherits(edata, "table") || length(dim(edata)) > 2) {...

...t;> print(cc) >>> >> if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified >>> >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >>> >> trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ >>> >> str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) >>> >> print(ls()) >>> >> try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) >>> >> })) >>> >> } >>> >> })) >>> >> loadNamespace(&q...

...t;>? print(cc) ? ? >>> >>? if (cc == 31) {? ## manually identified ? ? >>> >>? ? untrace(methods::conformMethod) ? ? >>> >>? ? trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ ? ? >>> >>? ? ? str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) ? ? >>> >>? ? ? print(ls()) ? ? >>> >>? ? ? try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) ? ? >>> >>? ? })) ? ? >>> >>? } ? ? >>> >> })) ? ? >>> >> loadNamespace(&q...

Ok Mathias.. I hoop this helps a bit. https://technet.microsoft.com/nl-nl/library/cc816941(v=ws.10).aspx now type : nslookup -type=soa internal.domain.tld or nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld and look at nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld ip_of_a_NS1-server. nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld ip_of_a_NS2-server. And see.. The soa record contains only

...quot;, fstr[[1]][1]) > > if (is.null(highlighting) && (!dep %in% c("","Freq"))) { > > if (all(varnames == ".")) { > > varnames <- if (is.data.frame(data)) > > colnames(data) > > else > > names(dimnames(as.table(data))**) > > varnames <- varnames[-which(varnames %in% dep)] > > } > > > > varnames <- c(varnames, dep) > > highlighting <- length(varnames) + length(condnames) > > } > > > > > > if (inherits(edata, "ftabl...

...t;> print(cc) >>> >> if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified >>> >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >>> >> trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ >>> >> str(list(signature = signature, mnames = mnames, fnames = fnames)) >>> >> print(ls()) >>> >> try(str(list(omittedSig = omittedSig, signature = signature))) >>> >> })) >>> >> } >>> >> })) >>> >> loadNamespace(&q...

The changes from the last drop are: 1. Patch 11 removes struct dlm_lock_name. 2. Patch 12 is an unrelated bugfix. Actually is related to a bugfix that we are retracting in mainline currently. The patch may need more testing. While I did hit the condition in my testing, Marcos hasn't. I am sending it because it can be queued for 2.6.30. Give us more time to test. 3. Patch 13 will be useful