search for: mlh

Hi all I am having some issues with a gs 100 phone. It is on the same network as my * server. There is no firewall. In extentions.conf exten => 5,1,Answer exten => 5,2,MusicOnHold(default) When I dial 5 from the sip phone -- Executing Answer("SIP/mlh-2e75", "") in new stack -- Executing MusicOnHold("SIP/mlh-2e75", "default") in new stack -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/mlh-2e75 -----------about 7 secs....................... -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/mlh-2e75 == S...

Full_Name: Yves Rosseel Version: 2.2.1 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (157.193.116.152) The code below sketches a possible implementation of a function 'mlh.mlm' which I think would be a good complement to the 'anova.mlm' function in the stats package. It tests a single linear hypothesis of the form H_0: LBT'= 0 where B is the matrix of regression coefficients; L is a matrix with rows giving linear combinations of the regressions coeffi...

I just got a grandstream SIP phone Here is my sip.conf for the phone [mlh] type=friend insecure=yes username=mlh secret=mlh host=dynamic canreinvite=no The phone as the default config on it. If I use the phone to call a Zap interface (a tdm card) the voice sounds all choppy. If I use the phone to call a x100p card, it does not dial what I dial (no D...

...r anything at all... I get this error: Sep 27 23:20:27 WARNING[1142127920]: File chan_sip.c, Line 444 (retrans_pkt): Maximum retries exceeded on call 0765c89e-9d67-3c0a-b9b9-2e7f3cd1d9ef@192.168.50.248 for seqno 58430 (Response) here is my sip debug: -- Executing VoiceMailMain2("SIP/mlh-b787", "") in new stack We're at 192.168.50.1 port 27838 Answering with capability 2 Answering with capability 4 Answering with capability 8 Reliably Transmitting (no NAT): SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.248 From: "Michael Hess" <sip:mlh@192.168.50.1>...

Hi R-users I'm trying to do multivariate analysis of variance of a experiment with 3 treatments, 2 variables and 5 replicates. The procedure adopted in SAS is as follow, but I'm having difficulty in to implement the contrasts for comparison of all treatments in R. I have already read manuals and other materials about manova in R, but nothing about specific contrasts were found in them,

With a single server, settings "security = server" and "password server = pdc1 pdc2', I can successfully authenticate against two entirely different PDCs depending on which order I put the two machines in the 'password server' list. Is there someway of forcing clients from either domain to authenticate against the 'right' pdc, regardless of the order in the

...J(FRS$-+ z_;`W;As)=%nwY)PT(4C3Vbm^5FJDi;SYG)sOn&wJ3DTAB`nk(z at oLM9s3DGw9bLV5 z|1Ls^JuwVJI-T~~wVU&2q}G`QOX<7_vt4YljdKdYUf}VFour%^KR!7sbL+usT%IDM zfZpH`f8qoo1lE>}j8p_bbLJ9Xzim8}Md82~xUv8jpta`Xr_Y=`ag2-8lPtY?$Is2* z6h($H#s#U$As^tf7 at x%?NkX^(m$mgTjE@~go1E`IHpxte(F&=w1v{Y3Vw?yuW<MLh zwy2F(nVPxHPLksB#BoAa<Vcg3Auc6wiogf-`i}R at PYI=@BBgg8QQ91(GgepLO3}P< zezvo%t_GpB&cVTYMWm at tqbNF6tJNj|y4~)xs2UyU_4<#*ut7KG=1w;njXU*vy--St gPP=Vdt=0m-KfYwn??4I``~Uy|07*qoM6N<$f<@--od5s; literal 0 HcmV?d00001 -- 1.7.2.1

All, I wrote a port of rsync to c# / .net. If there is interest in this, I'd be happy to make the code available. The current code will send synchronize with a linux rsync server, and can run in daemon mode on windows (I've made even a windows service wrapper for it). It's far from clean, and far from perfect, but it works and can be a good starting point. Please let me know,

Just so that it gets into the archives for future googlers: If you get 'system error 64' on a windows xp machine trying to connect to samba, then make sure you have nothing running on port 445. I had an apache ssl instance running on that port. Doh! Had to scratch my head a bit over it. XP doesn't actually need anything to be on 445, it just gets confused and gives up if there is.

...J(FRS$-+ z_;`W;As)=%nwY)PT(4C3Vbm^5FJDi;SYG)sOn&wJ3DTAB`nk(z at oLM9s3DGw9bLV5 z|1Ls^JuwVJI-T~~wVU&2q}G`QOX<7_vt4YljdKdYUf}VFour%^KR!7sbL+usT%IDM zfZpH`f8qoo1lE>}j8p_bbLJ9Xzim8}Md82~xUv8jpta`Xr_Y=`ag2-8lPtY?$Is2* z6h($H#s#U$As^tf7 at x%?NkX^(m$mgTjE@~go1E`IHpxte(F&=w1v{Y3Vw?yuW<MLh zwy2F(nVPxHPLksB#BoAa<Vcg3Auc6wiogf-`i}R at PYI=@BBgg8QQ91(GgepLO3}P< zezvo%t_GpB&cVTYMWm at tqbNF6tJNj|y4~)xs2UyU_4<#*ut7KG=1w;njXU*vy--St gPP=Vdt=0m-KfYwn??4I``~Uy|07*qoM6N<$f<@--od5s; literal 0 HcmV?d00001 -- 1.7.2.1

I posted a question earlier (below) regarding two instances of samba on the same machine. Unfortuneately my question only elicited questions. Can anyone tell me whether samba locks and Unix locks pay well together? Will samba notice unix locks aaaaand vice versa? I _did_ look at the documentation but I think it was very out of date. (e.g. UNIX-SMB.txt in samba 2.2.3 says that "Unix has

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

Hi , I need to do my user_windows "eng.processo" to acess my unix solaris 2.x as user_unix "cs02929". As like indicate, I create in "global" of file "smb.conf" the command: username map = /etc/smbusers and into the file /etc/smbuser, the command: cs02929 = "eng.processo". This it don?t work. Please, what do I do to this work? Do I forgot

...0jFd0iDMDvEs1RdkHOyoifPLAk4knPDEP/Pqk0wKFjTsl7MKiGuff1KtUBh Jan+px6KI7zw5EK6vMqrjoCt9XCobtzvuHQnHnZp8pE66FHvFWbnQU56Cya9 eGjFxfo4Ib9kAAax3t0utho4mgZswPsDMGKs1HLTCE1oWDRa00wkoMeOmpJp 4KbWzJr+aRKmAhCaIGkwpryqmpZphpJmBk16fjX8nzFi5hYcCpk8PyQQ0wJN enQ0FNMuTDDeQJLMafim4PJIcap0krBpjqaccJpiaVSmOHJJkHg1Ghcm+MLh 5JTZ1PPeDk2OvDSi01RNXlY0btN+Up52Btaw5uYdgZjUyuTTtqaYHI6ahGmD poCBmrNpj6ZIb5phaWSmfQeaZ2lr2ProzxMDANp7TT5kJkirAP4SS9hZ+1M6 ALPPUEkNklXcAJemVq8Cp/UjAIiT9lA2zvPFAKz68LYLU6gUAKFnq2cfOq7y AIUOrYF0H7kQAP4rumNAdr/2ANpCvIV9KyTnABcfJ5SpQiIBBzN2IXKm7CD+ LEOBjQCSHoQYCCqHawCvg9/JBbfcugC76tkvId7aXAAY76D2ktujhQA...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

Hi, I added these lines to smb.conf: kernel op locks = false op locks = false strict locking = true so I could see some locks from the unix level. It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files (but not the locks I was expecting), but for little files it shows nothing: # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/contents.doc 0 22086 W