search for: mgorni

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny at gentoo.org> wrote: > W dniu wto, 29.08.2017 o godzinie 16∶52 -0700, użytkownik Hans Wennborg > via llvm-dev napisał: >> Hello testers, >> >> 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. >> >> There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes >> up, this is what the final release will look

On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 09:57 -0700, Tom Stellard via lldb-dev wrote: > On 10/22/2019 09:08 AM, Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We're getting ready to start migrating to GitHub. SVN will be moved to read-only now and we'll > > begin the process of turning on GitHub commit access. I'll send an email when we're done. > > >

Hi Manuel, I believe you're maintaining Phabricator at reviews.llvm.org <http://reviews.llvm.org/>. Duncan likes to send his patch comments via email, like in the example below. Do you know why don't his replies get imported into the web interface? The reply was sent to "reviews+D24569+public+a5763c0a090df06f at reviews.llvm.org

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the potential for confusion about >> whether it's a major release (as it would have been under the old >> scheme) or a patch release. > > But if the versioning

Hi All, I’m being a complete newbie on this one but how do I generate the OCaml bindings? I saw an old google post using “configure —enable-bindings=ocaml” but we don’t use configure anymore (I’m building 3.9.1) and if I just do a regular build (optimized) then I don’t see any bindings in my build directory…. Any ideas? JC

This library is intended to be used locally for tests and not installed as a global system library. And even if it were, the install doesn't belong to LLVM but to a dedicated gtest package. --- utils/unittest/CMakeLists.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/utils/unittest/CMakeLists.txt b/utils/unittest/CMakeLists.txt index fd1a048..c11c110 100644 ---

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 Summary: Please support passing a filename to iptables-save Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Hi, A new speculative cache side-channel vulnerability has been published at https://developer.arm.com/support/arm-security-updates/speculative-processor-vulnerability/downloads/straight-line-speculation, named "straight-line speculation”, CVE-2020-13844. In this email, I'd like to explain the toolchain mitigation we've prepared to mitigate against this vulnerability for AArch64.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Again, nothing earth-shattering in this release. Mostly some minor bugfixes and cleanups. Some highlights: - - setcifsacl can now work without a plugin - - systemd-ask-password is found using $PATH now - - cifs.upcall now works with KEYRING: credcaches Go forth and download! webpage: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFS_utils tarball:

Hi, the first question is addressed both to llvm-dev and gentoo-dev. The second one is Gentoo specific. Is there any possibility to build LLVM both as static and shared libraries? What I see currently is that our ebuild makes LLVM to build shared libs unconditionally. Is there a possibility (if it is impossible to build both lib types) to at least give to user control on what kind of libs he

Hi, We're getting ready to start migrating to GitHub. SVN will be moved to read-only now and we'll begin the process of turning on GitHub commit access. I'll send an email when we're done. -Tom

On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 19:58 +0100, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: > On 24 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > 8.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r351980). > > > > It took a little longer than planned, but it's looking good. > > > > Please run the test

Hello testers, 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes up, this is what the final release will look like. Please test and let me know if there are any issues. Cheers, Hans

> On Sep 2, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 16 Aug 2016, at 00:12, Lawrence, Peter via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> As someone that has worked with both gcc and llvm, >> >> One thing about gcc that drives me bat-guano-crazy is that >> First you check out gcc, try to

Hello, all. I'm a fairly new maintainer of Gentoo packages for LLVM and clang. I'm trying to improve the way LLVM is built on Gentoo, and that's why I'm wondering which of the build systems of LLVM is supported better. As far as I'm aware, LLVM can be currently built using one of the two build systems: - one built on top of autoconf with custom Makefiles, - the other one

Dear everyone, There's still plenty of time left, but I'd like to get the schedule set before folks start disappearing for the holidays. Note that this release will also switch us to the new versioning scheme where the major version is incremented for each major release (i.e., when the 4.0 branch is created, trunk will become 5.0). If you'd like to help providing binaries and

Hello everyone, Release Candidate 2 was tagged earlier today as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2. It includes 98 commits since the previous release candidate. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc2 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues

Hello everyone, It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc1 Pre-built binaries will be added there as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of

Hello again, 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc4 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are not a lot of changes from rc3 to rc4, and there are again no open release blockers, so I'm hoping this will be the last