search for: mgerdt

Samba 2.2.0 on SPARC Solaris 8 Configured with: ./configure --with-pam --with-syslog --with-quotas --with-msdfs --with-acl-support I am accessing the share \\server\mgerdts, which is itself an automounted (NFS) directory. That is, /home/mgerdts on server really exists on nfsserver. On nfsserver, rquotad is commented out of inetd.conf. Using smbclient (2.0.7, yeah I know) I do: smbclient //server/mgerdts smb: \> ls ... Error in dskattr: code 0...

...corporated all of the feedback given (thanks!). Changes since the 2008-11-16 version include: - ksh style & coding standards compliance in test script (Roland) - "dof_init_debug == B_FALSE" vs. "!dof_init_debug" (Adam) The updated webrev is at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mgerdts/6750659-2008-12-03/ -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

People might find this entertaining and/or useful: http://www.gnu.org/manual/autoconf-2.52/html_chapter/autoconf_10.html With the help of Jos Backus I just discovered the answer to http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync-cvs/2002-January/001271.html is that Sun's test(1) is breathtakingly broken when passed a dangling symlink: $ ln -s /nowhere bad $ ls -l bad lrwxrwxrwx 1 josb

...dentify the performance characteristics in this area? Is there less to be concerned about from a performance standpoint if the workload is primarily read? To maximize the efficacy of dedup, would it be best to pick a fixed block size and match it between the layers of zfs? -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

...stem reboots. This pro- perty can also be referred to by its shortened column name, "temp". > (I am trying to move this thread over to zfs-discuss, since I originally > posted to the wrong alias) storage-discuss trimmed in my reply. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

Hi gurus, I like zpool iostat and I like system monitoring, so I setup a script within sma to let me get the zpool iostat figures through snmp. The problem is that as zpool iostat is only run once for each snmp query, it always reports a static set of figures, like so: root at exodus:snmp # zpool iostat -v capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read

...ould come in very handy. It would seem that it isn''t too big of a deal to identify the files that changed, as this type of data is already presented via "zpool status -v" when corruption is detected. http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/gbctx?a=view -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

I am pretty new to Dtrace but use the Dtrace Toolkit when trying to troubleshoot I/O issues On Oracle. I am looking for help on how to do the following: I am trying to answer whether adding more HBA Cards/ports would be effective. To do this, I need to know the i/o''s per second As well as total bandwidth per second. Has anyone done this before? Does anyone have any other ideas on how

...low the file system to tell the storage array "this range of blocks is unused" so that the array can reclaim the space? I could see this as useful when doing re-writes of data (e.g. crypto rekey) to concentrate data that had become scattered into contiguous space. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

Hi Everyone ; I will soon be making a presentation comparing ZFS against Veritas Storage Foundation , do we have any document comparing features ? regards <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email

Is there any update/work-around/patch/etc as of the S10u4 WOS for the bugs that existed with respect to LU, Zones, and ZFS? More specifically, the following: 6359924 live upgrade needs to include support for zfs I can''t even find that bug ID on bugs.opensolaris.org (or via sunsolve when I''m logged in for that matter) anymore. Basically, one couldn''t put zoneroot on

Does anybody know if native block level replication or block level ?de-duplication? as NetApp calls it will be added? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Today, I ran a scrub on my rootFS pool. I received the following lovely output: # zpool status larger_root ? pool: larger_root ?state: ONLINE ?scrub: scrub completed after 307445734561825856h29m with 0 errors on Wed Jul 15 21:49:02 2009 config: ??????? NAME??????? STATE???? READ WRITE CKSUM ??????? larger_root? ONLINE?????? 0???? 0???? 0 ????????? c4t1d0s0? ONLINE?????? 0???? 0???? 0 errors: No

I''m unable to boot a zone after I did a sys-unconfig, how do I recover? GLOBAL ZONE: --------------------------- dmpk14a603# zoneadm list -cv ID NAME STATUS PATH 0 global running / 1 snitch-zone02 running /snitch-zone02 4 snitch-zone04 down /snitch-zone04 dmpk14a603# zoneadm -z snitch-zone04 boot zoneadm: zone

My system (a laptop with ZFS root and boot, SNV 64A) on which I was trying Opensolaris now has the zpool-related kernel panic reboot loop. Booting into failsafe mode or another solaris installation and attempting: ''zpool import -F rootpool'' results in a kernel panic and reboot. A search shows this type of kernel panic has been discussed on this forum over the last year.

Before I open a new case with Sun, I am wondering if anyone has seen this kernel panic before? It happened on an X4500 running Sol10U3 while it was receiving incremental snapshot updates. Thanks. Aug 25 17:01:50 ldasdata6 ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=fffffe857d53f7a0: Aug 25 17:01:50 ldasdata6 genunix: [ID 895785 kern.notice] dangling dbufs (dn=fffffe82a3532d10, dbuf=fffffe8b4e338b90) Aug 25 17:01:50

Deduplication was committed last night by Mr. Bonwick: > Log message: > PSARC 2009/571 ZFS Deduplication Properties > 6677093 zfs should have dedup capability http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2009-November/010683.html Via c0t0d0s0.org.

Hi Folks.. I have/had a zpool containing one filesystem. I had to change my hostid and needed to import my pool, (I''ve done his OK in the past). After the import the mount of my filesystem failed. # zpool import homespool cannot mount ''homespool/homes'': mountpoint or dataset is busy The data seems it might still exist, (correct amount of used space is reported),

...p/thursday.snap.gz | zfs receive -F pool/thursday === End quote === There have been several threads on this list saying not to do that. It seems that this guide aimed at new users is inviting people to do things that will lead them to unsympathetic ears if things go poorly. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

I wanted to send out status on the effort to make a version of Solaris install available that supports zfs as a root file system. I''ve got a version of it ready for distribution, but I''d like to test it on the Build 62 community release before I make it available. Without the build 62 community release, I have to test it on a build 61 image, updated with some build 62 packages.