search for: maquerad

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "maquerad".

Did you mean: maquerade
2008 Feb 12
2
About NAT MAQUERADE
Hello everybody, ?'m want to create a maquerade for my lan in the firewall server I know i can use: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o external-interface -j MASQUERADE but I want to use this nat only for some IPs How can i restrict the nat maswuerade for an IP or Ip range? regards Roilan ____________________________________________...
2012 Jul 04
0
[Bug 693] SNAT is failing to maquerade some TCP RST packets
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 Myroslav Opyr <myroslav at quintagroup.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |myroslav at quintagroup.com OS/Version|Ubuntu |All --- Comment #10 from
2012 Dec 06
0
[Bug 693] SNAT is failing to maquerade some TCP RST packets
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #11 from Jozsef Kadlecsik
2011 Dec 05
6
[Bug 693] SNAT is failing to maquerade some TCP RST packets
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 --- Comment #5 from www at applejelly.org 2011-12-05 01:26:07 --- Created an attachment (id=370) --> (http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=370) A test case SNAT fails to maquerade some TCP CWR, TCP ECN, TCP URG, TCP ACK, and TCP PSH packets -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
2011 Aug 09
0
[Bug 693] SNAT is failing to maquerade some TCP RST packets
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 David Davidson <david at commroom.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at commroom.net --- Comment #3 from David Davidson <david at commroom.net> 2011-08-10 01:26:47
2004 Oct 31
9
Maquerading through IPSECed wireless dropping packets selectively?
Hello, I''m stuck IPSECing my wireless network at home and would appreciate any comments. I appologize in advance if I''m wasting your time with trivia - I''m not a professional and staring at the problem for days from various angles hasn''t done me any good ... My home server/firewall (morannon) is hooked up through an USB to ethernet adapter (eth1) to my DSL
2007 Jun 06
1
CDR changes in 1.4.3?
...NSWERED), etc. > > CDR's are complicated by the fact that they record 3 events: "start", > "Answer", and "end" events. Add to that the fact that in most cases at > least two channels are involved, sometimes 4 or 5, or even more, > involving bridging, maquerading, parking, transfers, local channels, > AGI, conferences, and more... > > Some cases were impossible to fix unless CDR's were attached to every > channel, > and merged to collect the bits and pieces that sometimes were on the > wrong side of the bridge. > > The result...
2015 Apr 03
0
iptables marking and NAT issue
Hello all, It appears that, for some reason I have thus far failed to understand when you use marking in iptables you then run into troubles if you attempt to do NAT (MAQUERADE). Let me describe this in more detail. We are attempting to use a network test environment named ATCD running it on a CentOS VM under VirtualBox. For more into on ATCD see: https://github.com/facebook/augmented-traffic-control The networking inside the VirtualBox environment is private so at s...
2001 Feb 28
1
Nbfw, Cross-subnet browsing
...amba on a linux masquerading firewall/router. It works pretty well. I was wondering if there was plan to include this patch in samba (or TNG) I was also wondering if there was any way to use this as a mean to do cross-subnet browsing efficient. The paradox is that browsing works better between a maqueraded network and a class C net (with nbfw) than between two class C subnet (with simple router, no masquerading and no nbfw) Thanks -- Fabrice Gautier <gautier@email.enstfr>
2002 Aug 13
0
No subject
Hi, I'm trying to build a vpn between two hosts with valid IP address. One maquerades the private network 192.168.1.0/24, the other masquerades 10.101.0.0/24. Configuration files and routes seem to be ok. I'm getting the following on beta: Could not set up a meta connection to alpha: Ago 5 17:56:24 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[16355]: Trying to re-establish outgoing connection in 2...
2002 Aug 13
1
Configuration problems
Sorry, repost --------------------------------- Hi, I'm trying to build a vpn between two hosts with valid IP address. One maquerades the private network 192.168.1.0/24, the other masquerades 10.101.0.0/24. Configuration files and routes seem to be ok. I'm getting the following on beta: Could not set up a meta connection to alpha: Ago 5 17:56:24 Viatel01 tinc.nextel[16355]: Trying to re-establish outgoing connection in 2...
2006 Feb 23
9
Balancing multiple connections and NAT
Hi, I have a client connected to the ''net through 3 ISP''s. Have set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. Am using iptables to SNAT traffic to the appropriate IP depending on the interface the packet gets routed onto. The setup looks something like this: Interface IP
2012 Nov 17
29
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
...ter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 Ruleset counter on -m recent match when recent table OVERFLOWED. -> http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689 Netfilter NAT engine conflicts with iproute2 routing cache purge -> http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690 SNAT is failing to maquerade some TCP RST packets -> http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 Files with the same name in case-insensitive file systems -> http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694 Extra tcp options for REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset-both / tcp-reset-destination -> http:...
2007 Apr 27
2
CDR changes in 1.4.3?
Hello all: I upgraded to 1.4.3 last night and use MySQL for CDR. I have noticed that 1.4.3 seems to log a lot of "crap" to CDR that 1.4.2 did not. I use a few macros in my dialplan to handle outgoing calls (lcr type stuff) and in addition to the proper CDR for the call itself I also have records to 's' in the same dest-context and entries to 's' in the default context.
2009 Sep 02
0
Wine release 1.1.29
...t. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bugs fixed in 1.1.29: 231 winemaker: Issue the warnings directly in the source 5625 Wine does not handle internet proxy settings conveniently 7854 VB 3.0: Installation fails 9294 Crash when loading Vampire - The Maquerade - Redemption 10397 CSS crashes when trying to accept option change 11345 Wrong button vertical position 11618 Wineinstall blocks midway through 13125 Fahrenheit (Indigo Prophecy) broken in newer versions of Wine. 13411 setup_exception_record stack overflow in Teach2000 13945 subv...