search for: manitu

I've been blocked twice this morning, and removed myself once - the first time, by the time I got to work and looked at the list, it was already gone. My hosting provider works with those jerks at manitu. I've ranted a number of times over the years at why their method is a *lousy* method for blocking spam in the second decade of the 21st century. Now this: here's another argument as to why the CentOS list should stop using them... when I went to remove myself, the email that told me I'...

listadmin, Can you PLEASE, PLEASE find *any* other blacklist than manitu? This asshole's method was ok a dozen years ago; these days, with hosting sites hosting tens or hundreds of thousands of domains, with too many running Windows, and so infected and sending out spam. They then send all mail via one mailhost, with the result that those of us with *no* spam coming...

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:11:12PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> This is annoying. I've been trying to get motion working correctly on CentOS 6. First, there was no ffmpeg rpms. Now, I try to install it, and <snip> >> I've run into problems with libfaad being missing before. Here's the real question: how were the ffmpeg and ffmpeg-libs

...u can > delete your own text from the attached returned message. > > The mail system > > <centos-virt at centos.org>: host mail.centos.org[72.26.200.203] said: 554 5.7.1 > Service unavailable; Client host [62.208.144.128] blocked using > ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Your e-mail service was detected by > junk.over.port25.me (NiX Spam) as spamming at Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:21:21 > +0200. Your admin should visit > http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?value=62.208.144.128 (in reply to > RCPT TO command) > Reporting-MTA: dns; nhs-pd1e...

In case someone's using the nixspam RBL and wondering why the influx from the CentOS mailing lists has stopped today: http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?language=en&value=72.21.40.12 Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Most of the time since last Thursday or so, that piece of crap called Nixnet (ix.manitu) has been blocking my hosting provider's mailservers. I did ask, when I talked to support last week, and they host *millions* of domains. They do not have a million techs (neither does google - but I'm *sure* none of you have ever gotten spam from google mail, right?). Again, I'll giv...

Forwarding this to the list as I had a problem with our domain being blacklisted: <centos-virt at centos.org>: host mail.centos.org[72.26.200.203] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [62.208.144.128] blocked using ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Your e-mail service was detected by mx-ha.web.de (NiX Spam) as spamming at Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:14:02 +0200. Begin forwarded message: > From: Keith Roberts <keith.roberts at ecric.nhs.uk> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] xen-4.4.3-1 packages released > Date: 24 September 2015 09...

...> blacklisted: >> >> <centos-virt at centos.org <mailto:centos-virt at centos.org>>: >> host mail.centos.org <http://mail.centos.org>[72.26.200.203] said: 554 5.7.1 >> Service unavailable; Client host [62.208.144.128] blocked using >> ix.dnsbl.manitu.net <http://ix.dnsbl.manitu.net>; Your e-mail service >> was detected by mx-ha.web.de <http://mx-ha.web.de> (NiX >> Spam) as spamming at Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:14:02 +0200. >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> *From: *Keith Roberts <keith.robe...

...sage with [Subject: "RE: [CentOS] Mail has quit working"] to centos at centos.org. MTA p3plwbeout03-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 554 , 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [72.167.218.218] blocked using ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Your e-mail service was detected by mail.ixlab.de (NiX Spam) as spamming at Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:45:20 +0200. Your admin should visit http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?value=72.167.218.218 .. So, I'm trying a third time: On 24/07/18 13:46, Nataraj wrote: > Simply telnet to mailser...

...OS] Mail has quit working"] to >> centos at centos.org. MTA p3plwbeout03-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net >> received this response from the destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - >> 554 , 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [72.167.218.218] >> blocked using ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Your e-mail service was detected by >> mail.ixlab.de (NiX Spam) as spamming at Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:45:20 >> +0200. Your admin should visit >> http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?value=72.167.218.218 >> .. >> >> >> So, I'm trying a third time: &g...

...sage with [Subject: "RE: [CentOS] Mail has quit working"] to centos at centos.org. MTA p3plwbeout03-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 554 , 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [72.167.218.218] blocked using ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Your e-mail service was detected by mail.ixlab.de (NiX Spam) as spamming at Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:45:20 +0200. Your admin should visit http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?value=72.167.218.218 > .. > > So, I'm trying a third time: > > On 24/07/18 13:46, Nataraj wrote: >&g...

...s can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. [filme] comment = Muvis path = /mnt/manitu/Filme public = yes guest only = yes writable = no printable = no [tot filme] comment = tot Muvis path = /mnt/issis/Filme public = yes guest only = yes writable = no printable = no [alte filme] comment = alte Muvis path = /mnt/windows/Filme public = yes gu...

...210G Microsoft basic > 7 965732352 982509567 8G Linux swap > Thoughts? I haven't been following this, and perhaps I'm being dense... but I see BIOS boot partition, and I see 8G of Linux swap... where's the Linux /boot and / partitions? mark PS: *FSCK* ix.manitu

I'm sending to you, directly, because manitu is again blocking my ISP.... Rosenthal, Shoshana wrote: > You are right it is a Dell PowerEdge. However as I said it stops in the middle of booting with no message. > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > >> On 3/20/2017 11:54 AM...

....c U timing/timing.h (pressing Ctrl-C) cvs [checkout aborted]: received interrupt signal I continue anyway... 3a. ./autogen.sh ... checking for working const... yes checking for xslt-config... no configure: error: xslt-config could not be found Huh? What am I missing? Redhat 7.3 % uname -a Linux manitu 2.4.18-10 #1 Wed Aug 7 11:39:21 EDT 2002 i686 unknown % rpm -q automake autoconf gettext libtool libxslt libxml2 automake-1.4p5-4 autoconf-2.13-17 gettext-0.11.1-2 libtool-1.4.2-7 libxslt-1.0.15-1 libxml2-2.4.19-4 Trying without xslt. 3b. ./autogen.sh --without-xslt-config ... checking for workin...

...dnsbl.inps.de*2 bl.spamcop.net*2 srn.surgate.net=127.0.0.2 spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net*2 rbl.rbldns.ru*2 psbl.surriel.com*2 bl.mailspike.net*2 rep.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[13;14]*1 bl.suomispam.net*2 bl.blocklist.de*2 ix.dnsbl.manitu.net*2 dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net dnsbl.justspam.org=127.0.0.2*2 all.s5h.net=127.0.0.2*2 hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.3 hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.[2;4]*2 # whitelists swl.spamhaus.org*-4 list.dnswl.org=127.0.[0..255].[2...

Hi all, Just out of curiosity: is there anything we can do, on the samba side, to counter the recent ransomware attacks? (or limit the damage done) I'm thinking like: limit the number of files per second a client (workstation) is allowed to edit, or some other smart tricks..? It would be nice if samba could be an extra layer of defense. Something perhaps a vfs module could help with..?

On 01/24/17 19:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/24/2017 02:14 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> So, it installed happily. >> Then wouldn't boot. > > What did the storage configuration look like, exactly? I'd guess that you put > one partition on each disk, combined those in a RAID1 MD array, made than an > LVM physical volume, and then created filesystems and

Hi, I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. General question to those of you who use RBL. Which lists do you recommend using? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site :

...29 < mwk> yeah seen the vpe stuff. 23:29 < mwk> this means... 1/10 engines down. heh. 23:29 < jb17bsome> How, odd I thought some of the cards did some stuff in sw...MIght have just been like the early cards (8200). Let me check again. 23:32 -!- ebo^ [~ebolad at 233.195.116.85.dsl.manitu.net] has quit [Quit: Verlassend] 23:33 < ymanton> actually, maybe youre right, they advertise only partial accel from some hw/codec combos, but the vdpau interface only accepts bitstream so they must do it in sw... 23:34 < ymanton> to cover the gap 23:38 -!- drago01 [~linux at chello062...