search for: loitering

Thanks for the interesting puzzle to crunch! Looking at these few bread-crumbs, I wager an educated guess that this loops in `sendcmd()` (where CLI child processes talk to a daemonized copy which tracks the timers for events), around here: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.8.0/clients/upssched.c#L583-L626 for the daemon and here for the child:

Thanks for the interesting puzzle to crunch! Looking at these few bread-crumbs, I wager an educated guess that this loops in `sendcmd()` (where CLI child processes talk to a daemonized copy which tracks the timers for events), around here: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.8.0/clients/upssched.c#L583-L626 for the daemon and here for the child:

Hi, Indeed, and I think this suggestion will succeed best if the delta between what community members do now and what they would need to do is small. Loitering on one extra IRC room is trivial; loading a whole new system just at the right time is likely to get fewer members. James On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 at 14:47, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote: > IRC doesn't archive messages, but many IRC communities run a bot as a room > participan...

FWIW, I wonder if this is a fallout of PR #1274 : https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1274/files and specifically https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/550064930e369fb3a322c3b28ffff8b4acf53532 which added a `sock_read()` loop continuation effectively if `pconf_char()` returned 0. Just grasping at straws here (since it is a change a couple of months before the release was cut),

FWIW, I wonder if this is a fallout of PR #1274 : https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1274/files and specifically https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/550064930e369fb3a322c3b28ffff8b4acf53532 which added a `sock_read()` loop continuation effectively if `pconf_char()` returned 0. Just grasping at straws here (since it is a change a couple of months before the release was cut),

Hi all! I'm trying to build the buoh comic reader for centos 6 and my head is getting tired of repeated forceful contact with the wall. I built it on 5.6 without undue problems, but somehow 6.0 is beating me. (and no, the 5.6 binary doesn't work, at least not without a lot of futzing around, on 6.0. tried that first.) before I give gory details, has anyone already done this, from whom

Hi, I ran the strace command while upssched was 100% CPU hungry. This is what I got: 1686633611.702798 read(7, "", 1) = 0 <0.000004> 1686633611.702816 read(7, "", 1) = 0 <0.000004> 1686633611.702834 pselect6(11, [7 10], NULL, NULL, {tv_sec=1, tv_nsec=0}, NULL) = 1 (in [7], left {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=999998800}) <0.000006> 1686633611.702862 read(7,

Hi, I ran the strace command while upssched was 100% CPU hungry. This is what I got: 1686633611.702798 read(7, "", 1) = 0 <0.000004> 1686633611.702816 read(7, "", 1) = 0 <0.000004> 1686633611.702834 pselect6(11, [7 10], NULL, NULL, {tv_sec=1, tv_nsec=0}, NULL) = 1 (in [7], left {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=999998800}) <0.000006> 1686633611.702862 read(7,

@James I am not sure in IRC if we can retrieve back the older messages. So consider Slack as suggestion only. *Vivek Pandya* On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 6:29 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hmm. But we already use IRC, we don't already use Slack (as a community). > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 at 10:57, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: >

puppet agent --verbose shows a verbose output of the changes done by puppet, such as: notice: /Stage[main]/Logstash::Config/Logstash::Configdir[agent]/File[/etc/logstash/agent/config]/owner: owner changed ''root'' to ''logstash'' notice: /Stage[main]/Varnish/Service[varnish]/ensure: ensure changed ''stopped'' to ''running''