search for: livni

Hi all, We are considering moving our VSS database from a Win2K server to a samba server. All clients are Win2K clients. I used the VSS tool "testlock.exe" to make sure the native lock mode can be used. The test was successful, and I saw that an SMBlock transaction was performed, and a reply_lockingX was replied. When I opened a VSS database on the samba server and started to use it -

I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10. I'm having a lot of oplock problems, specially when using office applications like word. I would like to know: 1. what is the recommended configuration in version 2.2.1a (oplocks = yes/no , level2 oplocks = yes/no , kernel oplocks = yes/no) 2. what is considered to be a stable version for oplocks usage Thanks, Nir

I understand that the difference between "server" and "domain" mode is that in "domain" mode"Samba fully uses the domain capabilities. He behaves like another NT Server or Windows 9x do by participating in domain trust relationships." Could someone please explain me 1. What is it exaclty that "domain" mode does, that "server" mode

What is the recommended linux version (RH 7.x) for samba 2.2.7 ? Are there any known issues with RH7.2 / RH7.3 ? -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi all, Please excuse me if this question is not appropriate for this forum: Lets assume that samba server crashed or was shut down abnormally, while users where holding open files in the server. In this case, I've noticed that locking.tdb is not being cleaned when samba is restarting. I was wondering why shouldn't it be cleaned. Thanks, Nir

Call for Participation - HPDC-2013 New York City, NY, June 17-21 Early registration is open! http://www.hpdc.org/2013 The ACM International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing (HPDC) is the premier annual conference for presenting the latest research on the design, implementation, evaluation, and the use of parallel and distributed

Call for Participation - HPDC-2013 New York City, NY, June 17-21 Early registration is open! http://www.hpdc.org/2013 The ACM International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing (HPDC) is the premier annual conference for presenting the latest research on the design, implementation, evaluation, and the use of parallel and distributed

Call for papers *Grid 2012: 13th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing* Beijing, China September 20-23, 2012 http://grid2012.meepo.org Co-located with ChinaGrid'12 Grid computing enables the sharing of distributed computing and data resources such as processing, network bandwidth and storage capacity to create a cohesive resource environment for executing distributed

Call for papers *Grid 2012: 13th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing* Beijing, China September 20-23, 2012 http://grid2012.meepo.org Co-located with ChinaGrid'12 Grid computing enables the sharing of distributed computing and data resources such as processing, network bandwidth and storage capacity to create a cohesive resource environment for executing distributed

Hi guys, I hope this is not an off-topic here. I'm trying to configure my samba on a RedHat AS 2.1, to run in an active-active configuration. The "Red Hat Cluster Manager Installation and Administration Guide" says on chapter 6.2 : "Allows the setup of an active-active configuration to maximize equipment utilization. More details on active-active configurations appear

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

I am using samba 2.2.1a , in an NT-4 domain. security = DOMAIN on the first logon to the samba server, I can see a message: Attempting host lookup for name MYPDCNAME<0x20> the next message appears after 10 seconds (that is the delay). samba tries to resolve MYPDCNAME with the wins server, and succeeds. Higher debug level (debug level = 10) does not produce more debug messages. Any ideas

I have skimmed through many web pages, how to''s and editorials, my final conclusion is that the programming language for this particular part of the program is going to be Ruby. There are many reasons: 1. Apple will support it in 10.5 2. There seems to be a lot of support for it in the Mac community 3. Ruby developers seem to be Mac people. 4. There is better documentation than