search for: lindoze

...necting problem:Need Help > > Til: samba@lists.samba.org > > > > I have problem connecting a win 98 client to a > samba > > 2.2.5 server on a linux box running redhat 7.2 > > I can see the server on the client but when I > click > > the server icon I get \\lindoze is no accessible. > > At that moment I have scanned the lan card an I > have > > this screen dump. > > 04:15:55.053492 kjersti.hauge.netbios-ns > > > 192.168.0.255.netbios-ns: > > >>> NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST > > 04:15:55.802...

I've just tried setting up a Shrike (9) version of Redhat. Using the medium settings of lokkit, then adding manually accept commands for ports 137/udp 138/udp, 139/tcp and 445/tcp, I thought I should have been ready to go. This isn't the case, however. I know it's not the smb.conf settup because when I kill iptables samba works. When iptables IS running however, it will respond

I have problem connecting a win 98 client to a samba 2.2.5 server on a linux box running redhat 7.2 I can see the server on the client but when I click the server icon I get \\lindoze is no accessible. At that moment I have scanned the lan card an I have this screen dump. 04:15:55.053492 kjersti.hauge.netbios-ns > 192.168.0.255.netbios-ns: >>> NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST 04:15:55.802612 kjersti.hauge.netbios-ns > 192.168.0.255.netbios-ns: >...

On Mon, January 12, 2015 11:00 am, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:05 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > wrote: > >> On Sun, January 11, 2015 11:22 am, Sven Kieske wrote: >>> >>> On 11.01.2015 03:42, James B. Byrne wrote: >>>> What does systemd buy the enterprise that sysinit did not provide? >>>>

Well I have samba 2.2.5 installed on a lindoze and a local printer connected to it. I can print through samba to the printer by typing this from the command line. lp -P %p filename % and this lpr -P %p filename %s I also have cups installed but can not print with this command lpr-cups -P %p filename %s. I log inn as root on the win95 client and...

I'm having lots of trouble getting connected to samba on my little 2 computer network at home. One is a RedHat machine and the other is Windows 2000. Trying to access my just the IP of the RedHat machine from my Windows machines gives me the "Cannot find the file or item '\\192.168.20.2'" error. I've got 2 NICs in my RedHat machine so I did use the "interface

I have installed Samba2.2.8a on a RedHatLinux 8.0 server. After trying several different changes to the 'smb.conf' file and several other tests I still cannot see the samba Server from the windows XP and windows 2000 client. When I run smbclient -L localhost this is what I get: added interface ip='ip address of my host' bcast=x.y.z.255(actual numbers instead of 'x'

Hi there, I am new to samba server. I just installed the samba suite (samba, samba-common, samba-client) for Redhat 7.3. After started samba server, I found there is no way for me to access the Redhat machine from Win2K. From the Win2K machine, I can see the linux machine name under folder 'My network places' , but I always get the error message " \\machine_name is not accessible.

...to reboot the box (and on multiple threads here there was a bunch of other unpleasant things mentioned so I'll skip them...). Linux from Unix-like system became more Windows like (sorry if it offends anyone, but I can't hold myself and not repeat what one of people called Linux then: "Lindoze"). > > So, several of those people fled to open solaris. My journey was different, I ended up migrating a bunch of most important boxes to FreeBSD. I know how many on this list are already allergic to me saying this, I promise, this is the last time. I'm using as excuse something fam...

...positive part I said - about great job both RH and CentOS teams are doing! But coming back to negative part (which is about almost any Linux distribution). These often reboots started in my recollection around 2.6 kernel which is long ago. Already then one of my friends started calling Linux "Lindoze" apparently stressing you need to reboot it often, like MS Windows. I would suggest to take his label with a grain of salt, as he is the one who also used funny name for another well known system, after Oracle bough out Sun Microsystems he called Sun-Oracle "snorkel" (as if you prono...

I am very new to Samba, so please excuse this naive question. Samba seems to be working properly from my Red Hat 7.2 system. I am using a GUI called xSMBrowser, and am able to transfer files back and forth to the Windows machines on my network. I now want to access my Linux system from a Windows 98 machine. I can see it ('Mail') in 'My Network Places' within the workgroup

I have installed Samba with a depot I downloaded from the HP-UX Porting and Archive Center. We have an intranet site on an HP-UX 11.0 box, and ultimately, my goal is to have links on the Web pages open up files (Word docs, etc.) on various Windows machines (XP, 2000, NT). I'm having difficulty getting Samba to work at all. I've scoured past newsgroup posts, and I'm not finding

On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally > (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates > - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around > 2.6 kernel) . . . I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been rather dismayed at the perceived increase in

I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on HP-UX 10.20. I've recently started adding WinXP (and 2000) clients to my network. Here's my issue: (It seems to effect both the XP & 2000 machines) I installed a WinXP machine on the network. I was able to add a bunch of samba-networked printers to the Xp machine. I recently added 2 new printers to the network. I added the printer names to my

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greeting, ~ I've setup my Red Hat 7.3 With samba 2.2.5 to be a PDC. Which at the same time, I'm having the same problem like *problems on windows part <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103675771200004&r=1&w=2>*. Accessing from windows to Linux always not a problem. But I'm having a problem to access it reverse. (from Linux

On Friday 31 August 2018 15:44:53 Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I would use FreeBSD (and I do use FreeBSD for bacula, now bareos backup > server and storage hosts), it has really small "footprint", and it is > quite widespread. > > Incidentally, I was using bacula for very long time, but recently I > switched to bacula's fork: bareos. You may want to consider the

Suddenly, today, my wife's Windows 95 machine can't print to the network printer on my Linux machine. It complains that "there was an error printing to \\posh\lp ... There was a problem printing to the port." The error 1st occurred (coincidentally?) after I had upgraded the kernel from 2.4.18 to 2.4.19. But rebooting to 2.4.18 has made no difference. We're running smbd

...to reboot the box (and on multiple threads here there was a bunch of other unpleasant things mentioned so I'll skip them...). Linux from Unix-like system became more Windows like (sorry if it offends anyone, but I can't hold myself and not repeat what one of people called Linux then: "Lindoze"). So, several of those people fled to open solaris. My journey was different, I ended up migrating a bunch of most important boxes to FreeBSD. I know how many on this list are already allergic to me saying this, I promise, this is the last time. I'm using as excuse something familiar I f...

I am trying to mount a Windows share on my Linux machine at boot time. I tried using the same syntax in /etc/fstab that is in /etc/mtab, but this did not work. Here is the mtab entry: //DELL-4400/linux /root/mnt/DELL-4400/linux smbfs 0 0 Barry

Hello, I just took an old PC and installed SuSE 7.0 on it. The machine has 32Mb of RAM, so I needed a slim installation and kernel, and this was the only package I could get to install without immense effort (I tried 5 other versions of small linux distros from linuxiso.org before this one). The version of Samba I installed on this Suse box is 2.0.7. From what I have read, this version SHOULD