Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "likai".
Did you mean:
lika
2004 Aug 06
0
[ icecast 1.3.11 win32 version ...]
...r because it
doesn't matter much. for configure-related stuff, you should be able to
find appropriate files from within your own autoconf/automake
distribution. if a file is reported missing from my branch, then that
means it doesn't hurt to have the file, but i never needed it.
enjoy
likai liu
Simon Thompson wrote:
>>From: Li-Kai Liu [mailto:news@likai.net]
>>Sent: 10 October 2001 21:32
>>To: Simon Thompson
>>Subject: Re: [[icecast-dev] icecast 1.3.11 win32 version ...]
>>
>>
>>which part of the win32 icecast are you interested in? the
>...
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast2?
On 19/02/02 18:09, Likai Liu shaped the electrons to say:
> >It's partially done in the patch I've sent you, completelly done in my
> >current version... I can send you the second patch, you will save some
> > work.
>
> how is the calculation being done? do you extract the bitrate from the
&...
2004 Aug 06
1
some portability fixes ...
...t; echo "don't bother to check for pthreads..."
> THREADLIBS=""
> else
>
373a393,394
> fi # enable_mingw = yes
>
86a87
> #include <errno.h>
2155a2157,2161
> }
> else
> {
> // for those lamer systems that mingles text ... LIKAI
> setmode( sourcecon->food.source->dumpfd, O_BINARY );
454a455,459
> else
> {
> // for those systems that mingles text ... LIKAI
> setmode( source->dumpfd, O_BINARY );
> }
40a41,43
> #ifdef _WIN32
> #include <win32config.h>
> #else
41a...
2004 Aug 06
4
[Interopcast-general] about translatingdocumentation, but not only documentation.
Just a few weeks ago, I was thinking of writing a streaming source using
libshout and portaudio. I was also considering LADSPA support, to do
some minor post-processing before encoding. However, I'm currently
developing on Mac OS X, and LADSPA's shared library plugin model has
some issues here to be resolved.
Another nice feature I have given a thought on is incorporating
2004 Aug 06
1
communication between icecast and sources
jaromil wrote:
>sorry if i'm quoting myself, but i feel i could have reported more
>
>i'm thinking about using this library: http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/
>which features the infrastructure of a solid http daemon (abyss, on top
>of w3c-libwww library) for running a xml-rpc server accepting registered
>function calls.
>
as icecast already has its own http parser
2004 Aug 06
0
[Interopcast-general] about translatingdocumentation, but not only documentation.
On Monday 04 August 2003 12:30, Likai Liu wrote:
> Just a few weeks ago, I was thinking of writing a streaming source using
> libshout and portaudio. I was also considering LADSPA support, to do
> some minor post-processing before encoding. However, I'm currently
> developing on Mac OS X, and LADSPA's shared library...
2004 Aug 06
1
Icecast2?
On 19/02/02 23:09, Likai Liu shaped the electrons to say:
> Ricardo Galli wrote:
> >By assigning a timestamp to each packet read from the source socket. I
> > think the only sane way to do it.
>
> great idea. with this implementation, actually you can set a smaller
> buffer size, but wait a longer t...
2004 Aug 06
1
icecast2 ogg vorbis client request headers
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, oddsock wrote:
> a simple conversation protocol will be developed, but you can expect something
> like the following :
>
> 1. client connects to mount point
> 2. icecast makes a URL call passing in mountpoint, username, password
cyrus-sasl can handle this, but I'm not sure if people like to figure out
how to configure cyrus-sasl. what about just a local
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast2?
On 19/02/02 06:14, Jack Moffitt shaped the electrons to say:
> > well, at 128kbps bitrate, it's only 6 seconds of data. 30 seconds would
> > have been more reasonable, how does everybody think? it might have to be
> > varied based on the bitrate of the stream.
>
> Good point. I will make this configurable in the end. 6 seconds is too
> little. I'll see what I
2013 Sep 06
3
Samba4 LDAP Integration with Asterisk
Hi,
I am turning crazy. I try to integrate Asterisk 11.5.1 into Samba4 LDAP,
but when I import the ldif file from contrib directory I get this error.
ldbmodify -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb asterisk.ldif
--option="dsdb:schema update allowed"=true
ERR: (No such object) "objectclass: Cannot add
cn=asterisk,cn=schema,cn=config, parent does not exist!" on DN
2004 Aug 06
0
cygwin 1.3.3 test result
sorry for being a major big mouth here, but i noticed cygwin 1.3.3
release has fixed some pthreads issue so I've decided to give it a try.
Initial results indicate that icecast can now be compiled as cygwin
binary (no win32) and run normally with minor issues. i have
observations that icecast-cygwin does not catch the SIGINT signal
correctly, and that when shutting down the server from
2004 Aug 06
0
Icecast2?
Ricardo Galli wrote:
>On 19/02/02 06:14, Jack Moffitt shaped the electrons to say:
>
>>Good point. I will make this configurable in the end. 6 seconds is too
>>little. I'll see what I can do to track by seconds instead of buffers.
>>
>
>It's partially done in the patch I've sent you, completelly done in my
>current version... I can send you the
2004 Aug 06
1
[PATCH] is it of any interest ?
Jack Moffitt wrote:
>I recommend that _no one_ run this patch on any server. It allows
>execution access to any file on the system as the user that icecast is
>run as. This is a surefire way to get yourself hacked to hell.
>
>The idea is nice, but you should really pay a lot more attention to
>security issues. cgi's need to be run from a certain directory only.
>You
2004 Aug 06
1
Asymmetric load balancing
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> If the client limits are hit on the server, it sends back an HTTP
> redirect with the location of a random mirror (not itself). This should
> be transparent to clients and acheive the affect you want. You could
> also combine with with round robin DNS to spread people over the servers
> initially.
>
> Seems fairly elegant.
2004 Aug 06
4
Icecast2?
Jack Moffitt wrote:
>As for the other parts, I do not understand why we shouldn't kick
>clients who fall 25 packets behind. That is more than 100k usually, and
>surely you don't think we should buffer them forever.
>
well, at 128kbps bitrate, it's only 6 seconds of data. 30 seconds would
have been more reasonable, how does everybody think? it might have to be
varied