search for: lhomm

Josh Coalson wrote: > --- engdev <engdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Has there been any progress on the ACM for FLAC >>that was being looked at by Steve Lhomme? > > > Haven't heard anything here about it for a long time. Sorry, I sent my reply to engdev privately (because there's no good reply to). In short I haven't worked on it due to limitations on AVI and since then I've worked on MCF to get rid of these problems and be...

> Steve Lhomme wrote: > > You might try to contact the makers of FruityLoops. Right now their > samples packs are in Ogg format (stored in a WAV IIRC). They like open > and free formats (they also use the LAME encoder). I've thought of doing lossy compression before on instruments, but I'd...

Hi, Has there been any progress on the ACM for FLAC that was being looked at by Steve Lhomme? Thanks, Owen.

"Steve Lhomme" <steve.lhomme@free.fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:3DC06324.10800@free.fr... > Josh Coalson wrote: > > --- engdev <engdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > >>Hi, > >>Has there been any progress on the ACM for FLAC > >>that was being looked at by Steve L...

--- smoerk <smoerk@gmx.de> wrote: > good idea, i'm always putting *.cue files to the directory with the > ripped audio files. but it would prefer one file per song and not one > big file for the whole cd. My vision of how the players should work is this: - make one album.flac with CUESHEET - player loads album.flac, sees CUESHEET, calculates CDDB id (or CDindex, or custom

I agree, but the idea behind the OGG formats is to build patent free codecs. Is FLAC really patent-free ? And does the OGG team agree to include FLAC in their specs ? smoerk wrote: > I agree. I think Ogg/Flac does not make sense, if it's not in the > official distribution. the benefits: > > - many ogg players could play flac > - flac could be integrated in oggenc (oggdrop)

I tried to compile FLAC on Windows (the winamp2 plugin as a test) and I encoutered a problem. The stat() function and the associated structure doesn't exist on Windows (Visual Studio 5/6). But _stat and the structure with the same name does exist. So would it be possible to change stat() and struct stat ? I did the following in the code : #define STAT(x,y) _stat(x,y) typedef struct stat

Drew Hess wrote: > Anyway, consider the chances that someone will use the BSD license to make > proprietary changes to FLAC. Weigh that against the chances that FLAC Well, I think going GPL would be too much, only GPL softwares could use the library. BSD is too much too because changes in the software world (improvements, bugs, backdoors) would not be available to you. Only the hardware

...flac format around is completely up to them. It's not a 'join Xiph and only use Ogg' proposition. Josh would remain the Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler of FLAC, and personally, I wouldn't have it any other way. Emmett Plant CEO, Xiph.org Foundation On 11/21/02 2:11 PM, "Steve Lhomme" <steve.lhomme@free.fr> wrote: > What keeps people around Xiph from using FLAC in OGG already and report > bugs? If marketing is what you're looking for it's OK. But that would > be bad to consider people around Xiph so close minded that they would > use your codec...

...DNS lookup (which is useless since I use a LMHOSTS file)... Otherwise, if anybody can tell me how to have the regular nslookup to recognise my linux box, I'd be very happy ! ----- Original Message ----- From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com> To: "'Steve Lhomme'" <s.lhomme@philog.com>; <samba@us5.samba.org> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:26 PM Subject: RE: Hostname problem | Steve, | The best bet would be to get your system set up properly so that | nslookup CAN resolve your system name s098; I am not familiar with your os, |...

--- tech@bishop.dhs.org wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Josh Green wrote: > > > Steve Lhomme wrote: > > > > > > You might try to contact the makers of FruityLoops. Right now > their > > > samples packs are in Ogg format (stored in a WAV IIRC). They like > open > > > and free formats (they also use the LAME encoder). > > > > I've...

--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > * Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > > away with until tonight: > > > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > > >

--- engdev <engdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > Hi, > > Has there been any progress on the ACM for FLAC > that was being looked at by Steve Lhomme? Haven't heard anything here about it for a long time. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: > Well, I think going GPL would be too much, only GPL softwares could use > the library. This is a common misconception, but entirely untrue. There are many free software licenses, including the BSD-style licenses, which are compatible with the GPL. You can read more about various...

En r?ponse ? Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:20:53PM -0800, Russell O'Connor wrote: > > > But in the end, it seems futile. A big company like Microsoft has > enough > > resources to reimplement libFLAC should they wish. Then they can > embrace > > and extend without worry about copyright. > > > > So I would

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Josh Green wrote: > > Steve Lhomme wrote: > > > > You might try to contact the makers of FruityLoops. Right now their > > samples packs are in Ogg format (stored in a WAV IIRC). They like open > > and free formats (they also use the LAME encoder). > > I've thought of doing lossy compression befo...

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:41:56AM -0700, tech@bishop.dhs.org wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Josh Green wrote: > > > Steve Lhomme wrote: > > > > > > You might try to contact the makers of FruityLoops. Right now their > > > samples packs are in Ogg format (stored in a WAV IIRC). They like open > > > and free formats (they also use the LAME encoder). > > > > I've thought o...

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:02:16AM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: > En r?ponse ? Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>: > > > BSD licensing has been demonstrated to work in practice, for similar > > applications, by a number of high-profile projects, including those > > associated with Xiph.org. I believe that in these situation...

...;>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; >> rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 >>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>To: ffmpeg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, vorbis@xiph.org >>Cc: D Richard Felker III <dalias@aerifal.cx>, >> Steve Lhomme <steve.lhomme@free.fr>, Cyrius <suiryc@yahoo.com>, >> Moritz Bunkus <moritz@bunkus.org>, spyder@wiesneronline.net, >> Ludovic 'BlackSun' Vialle <blacksun@corecodec.com>, >> betaboy@corecodec.com >>Subject: Re: Ogg Vorbis tracks in QT files &g...

...changes to FLAC. Weigh that against the chances that FLAC will be an even bigger success if you go with Xiph, and make your choice. I think it's a no-brainer. Go with Xiph! It'd be a great addition to Ogg. Just be ready for lots more bug reports :) -dwh- On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Steve Lhomme wrote: > En r?ponse ? earldunovant@earthlink.net: > > > On 21 Nov 2002 at 1:39, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > > > 2. The core libraries would become BSD-licensed. I've been really > > > 50/50 on this ever since I submitted the question to Slashdot > >...