search for: lemarchand

...ns: 1. What is the reason of delaying signature creation ? 2. As a same file (replicated or dispersed) having different signature thought bricks is by definition an error, it would be good to triggered it during a scrub, or with a different tool. Is something like this planned ? Cheers ? C?dric Lemarchand > On 18 Apr 2018, at 07:53, Sweta Anandpara <sanandpa at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Cedric, > > Any file is picked up for signing by the bitd process after the predetermined wait of 120 seconds. This default value is captured in the volume option 'features.expiry-time'...

...e76:4eff:fe10:23d8 Connecting to download.gluster.org <http://download.gluster.org/> (download.gluster.org <http://download.gluster.org/>)|23.253.208.221|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 2017-01-23 19:28:48 ERROR 403: Forbidden. Cheers, ? C?dric Lemarchand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170123/2c88e842/attachment-0001.html>

Hello, Our Asterisk runs with multiple remote sites (12 over an MPLS network), everything works fine except for the last site we have juste installed. When VOIP flows comes/goes from/to this site, there are sound quality issues, persistent, 100% reproducible, on every call. This is not a bandwidth or latency or jitter problem, everything is fine on the network. Our MPLS provider does all check

Hello list, I use tinc with QOS, and since some weeks I got problem with tunnel disconnection because the default "Pingtimeout" of 5 sec is reach. I think it happens because of the QOS shappe the tinc traffic (data here) to let some BP for VOIP, but whate is very strange is that the ICMP protocol is not include in the shapping, so tinc would never 'see' latency on the link,

...e - in your case, it can be set to 0 or 1. Point 2 is correct. A file corrupted before the bitrot signature is generated will not be successfully detected by the scrubber. That would require admin/manual intervention to explicitly heal the corrupted file. -Sweta On 04/16/2018 10:42 PM, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > Hello, > > I am playing around with the bitrot feature and have some questions: > > 1. when a file is created, the "trusted.bit-rot.signature? attribute > seems only created approximatively 120 seconds after its creations > (the cluster is idle and there is only o...

Hello, I am playing around with the bitrot feature and have some questions: 1. when a file is created, the "trusted.bit-rot.signature? attribute seems only created approximatively 120 seconds after its creations (the cluster is idle and there is only one file living on it). Why ? Is there a way to make this attribute generated at the same time of the file creation ? 2. corrupting a file

...le security weakness of Tinc because i only use it over our internal operator network (MPLS), but maybe one day will come the need to connect a remote node (over the "hostile Internet") to the core network, then security consideration will be the most important. Thx, C?dric -- *C?dric Lemarchand * 52 avenue de l'Europe 78160 Marly-le-Roi France Tel. +33 (0)1 30 08 88 88 Cell. +33 (0)6 37 23 40 93 logo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20101111/8b691d1b/attachment-0001.htm> -----...

...a shapping value on each nodes, known and respected by each others. (like MPLS does) As an exemple, you've got 3 nodes A,B and C, you want Tinc flows on A node only use 1000kbits on your link, even if B and C send simultaneously to A, they will not overrun this limit. A+ C?dric -- *C?dric Lemarchand * 52 avenue de l'Europe 78160 Marly-le-Roi France Tel. +33 (0)1 30 08 88 88 Cell. +33 (0)6 37 23 40 93 logo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20110114/5cde076d/attachment.htm> ----------...

The most dramatic disadventage of kvm guest is block device I/O, so I wouldn't recommend to virtualize file server if it is not necessary. In my case on host ntpd configured as source for virtual dc, and bind9 configured as type=slave for zones hosted on dc, (make shure that srv records in _msdcs.mysambadomain.local are resolving when virtual dc is down) and smbd fileserver with

29.12.2016 19:01, Filippe LeMarchand пишет: > Is kvm I/O realy disadventage? I use samba file server as kvm guest > (LVM storage pool) in some setups and disn't notice any problems. > Sequential read/write speed isn't noticeably different from > non-virtualized samba host. Did I miss something and should expect &gt...

...> Subject: Network management function of tinc Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:26:38 +0800 Size: 1884 URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20120418/f3aa9263/attachment.mht> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric_Lemarchand?= <cedric.lemarchand at ixblue.com> Subject: Re: Network management function of tinc Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:32:37 +0800 Size: 5020 URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20120418/f3aa9263/attachment-0001.mht> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and c...

Hello, I have removed a nod from my tinc network, but his informations (owned subnet and ip address) are still present in the internal routing table. I think that even if the node is not reachable anymore (his ip is, but not the tinc daemon on it), his routing information "lives" beetween nodes. Is this possible or do i need to sleep a bit !? ;-) Do i need to stop all nodes, then

Dear Sir, Any network management function is available on tinc vpn? Such as, how can I check it out how many VPN nodes is connected now? Regards,Eric P Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hard copy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Something strange is happening at my place: I have lots of packet loss in my tinc vpn. Network layout: laptop --- wifi --- other pc ping from laptop to other pc OUTSIDE tinc: 0% packet loss ping from laptop to other pc VIA tinc: 50% packet loss What could be the cause of that? Folkert van Heusden -- Always wondered what the latency of your webserver is? Or how much more latency you

...because i had to > connect from internal and external. > But when i try a bindaddr on the virtual device tcpdump shows the same > result that the connection comes > from the real IP. > > maybe some had the same problem an can give me a hint. > > > BR/Torsten -- *C?dric Lemarchand * 52 avenue de l'Europe 78160 Marly-le-Roi France Tel. +33 (0)1 30 08 88 88 Cell. +33 (0)6 37 23 40 93 logo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110615/a08a6e65/attachment.htm> -...

Hello, I have a Legrand Keor T [1] monitored via snmp, everything seems to work fine, upsc output looks good [2] except that I can?t get the low battery state "OB LB? as usual (it works fine with others UPS like APC or Dell). Here is the configuration : [lgups] driver = snmp-ups port = 192.168.99.60 community = public snmp_version = v2c mibs = auto

Hi, I have a routing problem. When i start tinc it creates the following route in the main routing table. 192.168.2.0/24 dev nb003004 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.8 The problem is that i want to use extra routing tables for each tinc vpn. When i set the netmask for the tinc device to 255.255.255.255. The route is not created, how can i add it to a another route table. Setting a

Hi all, I use tinc since 2 years between my MPLS sites in router mode, works like a charm. Today i am trying to make an ethernet bridge beetween 2 sites for video conference needs, the raison is that 1 side is behind nat, and i dont have access on the gate, other side is on public range. Because off H323 that doesn't handle unconfigured NAT, i would like to give a public IP to the video

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes

Is kvm I/O realy disadventage? I use samba file server as kvm guest (LVM storage pool) in some setups and disn't notice any problems. Sequential read/write speed isn't noticeably different from non-virtualized samba host. Did I miss something and should expect sudden trouble? In a letter dated Tuesday, December 27, 2016 2:12:59 MSK by Andrei Petrov via samba wrote: > The most dramatic