search for: languishing

As many of you know, when a piece of open-source software languishes with bugs for 3 years it's often forked Markdown.pl is licensed under the BSD license. (do `>tail -35 /path/to/Markdown.pl`) Has anyone thought of forking and maintaining Markdown.pl (hopefully with Gruber's blessing) to fix some of the known bugs? I'm not volunteering (I'd be horrible)... just seeing if

Hey folks, I''m falling behind in my Mongrel duties and seriously need to recruit an enterprising individual to take on the patch queue and help push out a new release with some minor fixes. The goal would be to just get patches that are currently languishing, pull them together, put them in the source, write some tests to try them, and then one slight design change. If this works out then I''d also look to hand over the reigns to this person. I''d hope to make this a younger coder looking to get some street cred and learn how to maint...

...subject line of your email). Yes, but it is a bug, just a hard one to fix. It needs someone to dedicate a serious amount of time to deal with it. Since most of the people who tend to do that generally use systems in UTF-8 locales where this isn't a problem, or don't use Windows, it is languishing. Duncan Murdoch > > Best, > Ista > On May 25, 2015 9:39 AM, "Richard Cotton" <richierocks at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Here's a data frame with some Unicode symbols (set intersection and union). > > > > d <- data.frame(x = "A \u222a B \u22...

EPEL maintainers? I note messages in the log about updated version 0.99.1 of CLAMAV being available since Mar 5th. for CentOS 6 no update is available yet. I used to use rpmforge for this package but that languished for months before updates became available and eventually stopped altogether. Is there something I can do to assist in getting this package updated? I have no idea if this is a

Hi Hal, >> 4. To fix this, I think that additional fast-math-flags are likely >> needed in the IR. Instead of the following set: >> >> 'nnan' + 'ninf' + 'nsz' + 'arcp' + 'contract' >> >> something like this: >> >> 'reassoc' + 'libm' + 'nnan' + 'ninf' + 'nsz' +

...l1e = fefa6a30, nl1e = 96efe027, ol1e = 0, gl1mfn = d8538 (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=2283) Could not modify L1 entry: va == fefa6a30, l1e == 96efe027, mfn == d8538 (I''ve added the two MEM_LOG() calls at line 1266 and 2283.) Any ideas where I should begin looking? Or is PAE support languishing? -- Randy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:radkins@impelind.com] > I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you > believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going > unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions. I see it go both ways. The really "interesting" problems that uncover new bugs in

Greetings LLVM Developers, My name is Kazuo, I’m the head of the largest Silicon Graphics IRIX community on the internet. I’m approaching this mailing list to see if any MIPS developers who hang out here are interested in developing the LLVM/Clang Compiler system for IRIX. There’s a growing need as GCC removed support for us from 4.8, over six years ago and since then we’ve absolutely languished

On 03/04/16 22:10, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: > W dniu 03.04.2016 o 04:39, Rob Kampen pisze: >> EPEL maintainers? >> I note messages in the log about updated version 0.99.1 of CLAMAV >> being available since Mar 5th. >> for CentOS 6 no update is available yet. >> I used to use rpmforge for this package but that languished for months >> before updates became

Hi there, Amazing changes! I really like what you''ve done with BackgrounDRb and I hope you continue developing it, since it was definitely somewhat languishing before. One small error stuck out for me, though. The create method requires an argument even if one isn''t used, such that if you have: def create @results = Hash.new end The server throws an error about trying to send an argument to create when it doesn''t accept any. Obvious...

On 10/01/2017 06:05 PM, Sanjay Patel wrote: > Are we confident that we just need those 7 bits to represent all of > the relaxed FP states that we need/want to support? > > I'm asking because FMF in IR is currently mapped onto the > SubclassOptionalData of Value...and we have exactly 7 bits there. :) > > If we're redoing the definitions, I'm wondering if we can

...> > Does anyone have any ideas on how to solve this? > > I'm happy to do the heavy lifting I just don't have the background in > ocaml to solve this by myself. > > Yours Tony > > [1] I suspects that as a result of the demotion to secondary and things > languishing there we skipped a few builds. It looks like the PPC64 OCaml package is buggy. Can you compile any threaded program at all, eg: echo 'print_endline "hello"' > test.ml ocamlfind c -package threads -thread test.ml -linkpkg -o test ./test Unfortunately I don't have a...

Whatever became of Ogg Theora? There seems to be still almost no news from Xiph or its developers regarding Ogg Theora. None at all since Mid-December, when the release of Alpha 2 was pushed back to a month ago... No news on plans for the second Alpha? No news of development "roadmaps"? No news on current developments or challenges that are stalling development? No CVS updates

Hello David! On 11/16/20 11:30 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > Generally, the bar for being in-tree is fairly low, the bar to being removed > from the experimental-back-ends list is much higher. An experimental back end > is not built by default and is not in any of the binary releases. > > Experimental back ends provide a probation period for the maintainer community.

I'm not aware of any additional bits needed. But putting us right at the edge leaves me uncomfortable. So an implementation that isn't limited by the 7 bits in SubclassOptionalData seems sensible. Thanks, -Warren From: Sanjay Patel [mailto:spatel at rotateright.com] Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 12:06 AM To: Ristow, Warren Cc: Hal Finkel; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re:

Hi all, I''ve been going over the chapters on RDOC and gems lately. I think we should probably work on making the code in Win32Utils "rdoc" friendly. I''ve started doing this with ''win32-ipc'' as an experiment. This probably means some directory reorganization, because I think gems looks for extensions in an ''ext'' directory, whereas

Hi, folks. I am planning on implementing Asterisk in 2006, and need to budget for it now, so I need to know what I'll need to get. My company has about 50 users, and is currently languishing on a very old Comdial PBX. All of our client computers are Macs; our servers are mostly OS X, with a couple Debians and a Red Hat. I am thoroughly experienced at systems administration, and can figure out most everything I need on the computer hardware and software side, but I am a complet...

...or those who do not know what Intel740 is (was), as of now, it is the only Intel discrete graphics chip to officially ship ever since Intel got deeply involved in the x86 PC system business with the likes of PCI bus and USB. And yes, that was almost 21 years ago. There was one patch that has been languishing over at Patchwork X.org website (https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/122823/) for more than 2 years, so I decided to apply it, and release a new version. With that patch applied and one more small patch I authored, the DDX compiles cleanly without compilation warnings. Kevin Brace Brace Comp...

This is a maintenance release of Number Nine Imagine 128 DDX. There was one patch that has been languishing over at Patchwork X.org website (https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/122831/) for more than 2 years, so I decided to apply it, and release a new version. With that patch applied and one more small patch I authored, the DDX compiles cleanly without compilation warnings. Kevin Brace Brace Comp...

Hi, To add to what Renato said: On 15/11/2020 21:59, Fāng-ruì Sòng via llvm-dev wrote: > I've looked at a few newer backends in LLVM and I think the policy is > unclear about how an experimental target is approved and reviewed. It's generally good form to tag anyone who commented in the mailing list threads on any patches, especially people who objected. If they're happy in