search for: l286

...DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00007934] = "julia_vcat4473") DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00000913] = "vcat") [2] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/DebugInfo/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp#L279-L286 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140506/5ec88189/attachment.html>

...0x00007934] = "julia_vcat4473") > > DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00000913] > = > > "vcat") > > > > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/DebugInfo/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp#L279-L286 > > > > > > If you just want the DW_AT_name you should be able to iterate over the > DIEs and pull out the DW_AT_name attribute from all of the subprogram > DIEs. Is there some other use that you're looking for? I'm not quite > sure what you're trying to accom...

...DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( >>> .debug_str[0x00000913] = >>> > "vcat") >>> > >>> > >>> > [2] >>> > >>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/DebugInfo/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp#L279-L286 >>> > >>> > >>> >>> If you just want the DW_AT_name you should be able to iterate over the >>> DIEs and pull out the DW_AT_name attribute from all of the subprogram >>> DIEs. Is there some other use that you're looking for? I'm not...

...g_str[0x00000913] = > >>>> > "vcat") > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > [2] > >>>> > > >>>> > > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/DebugInfo/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp#L279-L286 > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> If you just want the DW_AT_name you should be able to iterate over the > >>>> DIEs and pull out the DW_AT_name attribute from all of the subprogram > >>>> DIEs. Is there s...

...> Are there any other tests I can perform or ways that I can help gather data to get the longer tests supported? > The "test.battery.start" command takes a parameter in seconds (defaults to 600): https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_blazer-common.c#L286 It is possible that 600 seconds is too long for your model. All of these NUT instant commands get converted to one- or two-character commands to be sent to the UPS: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_q1.c#L40 It is probably worth a quick check to see if the ven...

Hello, I am trying to rebuild an index of 2+ million documents and have not been successful. I am running Python 2.7 Django 1.7 Haystack 2.1.1 Xapian 1.2.21 The index rebuild command I’m using is: django-admin.py rebuild_index --noinput --batch-size=100000 The rebuild completes but an immediate xapian-check returns this error: xapian-check ./archive_index record: baseB blocksize=8K

...quot;vcat") >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > [2] >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/DebugInfo/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp#L279-L286 >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> >>> >>>> If you just want the DW_AT_name you should be able to iterate over >>> the >>> >>>> DIEs and pull out the DW_AT_name attribute from all of...

...kends/xapian_backend.py", line 286, in update >> database.close() > > What's the version of xapian-haystack? There's not a database.close() anywhere > near line 286 in git master: > > https://github.com/notanumber/xapian-haystack/blob/master/xapian_backend.py#L286 > >> xapian.DatabaseCorruptError: Expected block 615203 to be level 0, not 1 >> docdata: >> blocksize=8K items=380000 firstunused=21983 revision=38 levels=2 root=21410 > > Is that the full output of xapian-check? > >> Any suggestions for how I could get more i...

...ng, I think it's simply due to doveadm_mail_server_user_get_host (https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-server.c#L179) bailing out too quickly: It's used by doveadm_mail_server_user (https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-server.c#L286) to set its `user`, `host`, `hostip`, `port` and `ssl_flags`. When doveadm_port is not (or set to 0): - `user` is set to `input->username`: OK - `host` is set to `ctx->set->doveadm_socket_path` (the content of the `-S` option): OK - `hostip` is not set: OK (Later on, the `host` is used in...

...t; into kernel cmdline on AMD system. But recently I found even I do not do this action, IOMMU is still enabled by kernel on AMD system. After searching, I found there is no such setting any more, refer to https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt#L286 There are only 3 possible value as below: amd_iommu= fullflush off force_isolation Could anyone can help to confirm the changes? Thank you! And another question, it is said that the "iommu=pt" option is to improves IO performance for devices in the host, it is not a must for VF PCI pas...

...ailarch/current/haystack/backends/xapian_backend.py", line 286, in update > database.close() What's the version of xapian-haystack? There's not a database.close() anywhere near line 286 in git master: https://github.com/notanumber/xapian-haystack/blob/master/xapian_backend.py#L286 > xapian.DatabaseCorruptError: Expected block 615203 to be level 0, not 1 > docdata: > blocksize=8K items=380000 firstunused=21983 revision=38 levels=2 root=21410 Is that the full output of xapian-check? > Any suggestions for how I could get more information to troubleshoot this >...

...can perform or ways that I can help gather > data to get the longer tests supported? > > > The "test.battery.start" command takes a parameter in seconds (defaults to > 600): > > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_blazer-common.c#L286 > > It is possible that 600 seconds is too long for your model. > > All of these NUT instant commands get converted to one- or two-character > commands to be sent to the UPS: > > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_q1.c#L40 > > It is...

...", line 286, in update >>> database.close() >> >> What's the version of xapian-haystack? There's not a database.close() anywhere >> near line 286 in git master: >> >> https://github.com/notanumber/xapian-haystack/blob/master/xapian_backend.py#L286 >> >>> xapian.DatabaseCorruptError: Expected block 615203 to be level 0, not 1 >>> docdata: >>> blocksize=8K items=380000 firstunused=21983 revision=38 levels=2 root=21410 >> >> Is that the full output of xapian-check? >> >>> Any sugges...

...elease at any time). IMO it is quite suitable to use as a daily driver on one's laptop. To test this feature, you really only need run the ssh client. For more details on the protocol extension behind UpdateHostkeys, please see https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/396d32f3/PROTOCOL#L286 Otherwise, feel free to ask me anything. Thanks, Damien Miller

...gt; Also, in the linked IR there is still a tremendous amount of counter > redundancy being left on the table that a "counter fusion" approach would > avoid. > E.g. > https://ghostbin.com/paste/qus2s#L306 - 6 counter updates in the same BB > https://ghostbin.com/paste/qus2s#L286 - 3 counter updates in the same BB > https://ghostbin.com/paste/qus2s#L261 - 2 counter updates in the same BB > https://ghostbin.com/paste/qus2s#L191 - 5 counter updates in the same BB > https://ghostbin.com/paste/qus2s#L435 - 9 counter updates in the same BB > https://ghostbin.com/past...

On Oct 25, 2016, at 8:08 PM, Michael Evans wrote: > > It seems that the UPS I bought is actually served by the blazer_usb driver. > > USB ids 06da:0003 (lsusb DB thinks it's a "Phoenixtec Power Co., Ltd 1300VA UPS", but this has apparantly been re-used by Eaton 5E2200USB-LA) > > It's sold as an Eaton 5E 1,100W 2,200VA 6-Outlet UPS > > SKU: 147140 Mfr

> On Mar 11, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > There have been a lot of responses. I'll try to summarize the thread and respond > to some of the questions/feedback. > > > Summary > ======= > > 1. We should teach GlobalDCE to