search for: kramers

Hello everyone Anyone know if there is implementation of Kramers-kronig relations[1] in any package? Thanks in advance for your attention. Cleber Borges [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramers%E2%80%93Kronig_relations --- Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antiv?rus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I'm trying to make sense of the options for multiple comparisons options in R. I've found the following options: pairwise.t.test, which provides standard t-tests, with options for choosing an appropriate correction for multiple comparisons TukeyHSD, which provides the usual Tukey test glht(package multcomp), which provides a variety of options >From the help list, it appears

Hello, I am performing a BACI analysis with ANOVA using the following glm: fit1<-glm(log(Cucs_m+1)~(BA*Otter)+BA+Otter+ID+Primary, data=b1) The summary(aov(fit1)) shows significance in the interaction; however, now I would like to determine what combinations of BA and Otter are significantly different (each factor has two levels). ID and PRIMARY substrates are categorical and included in

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, ????????? (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > >

Hello, I'm using a very large data set (n > 100,000 for 7 columns), for which I'm pretty happy dealing with pairwise-deleted correlations to populate my correlation table. E.g., a <- cor(cbind(col1, col2, col3),use="pairwise.complete.obs") ...however, I am interested in the number of cases used to compute each cell of the correlation table. I am unable to find such a

Hello, I am trying to merge two very large data sets, via pubbounds.prof <- merge(x=pubbounds,y=prof,by.x="user",by.y="userid",all=TRUE,sort=FALSE) which gives me an error of Error: cannot allocate vector of size 2962 Kb I am reasonably sure that this is correct syntax. The trouble is that pubbounds and prof are large; they are data frames which take up 70M and 11M

On 6 December 2014 at 00:03, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > Reverted for now. Not sure what's going on there. Sorry for the breakage. No worries, at least that was easy to spot. Huzzah for buildbots! :) cheers, --renato

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com>wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> > wrote: > > > Hi Pawel, > > > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > > still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you think update the > > release tarball is

Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the version I have been using. If it is already implemented than it is very good news. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Eli Bendersky [mailto:eliben at google.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:25 AM To: Manny Ko Cc: Albert Graef; Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT

Hello, I have searched and failed for a program or script or method to conduct a power analysis for a MANOVA. My interest is a fairly simple case of 5 dependent variables and a single two-level categorical predictor (though the categories aren't balanced). If anybody happens to know of a script that will do this in R, I'd love to know of it! Otherwise, I'll see about writing one

On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > > Hi Pawel, > > > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > >

On 27.10.2012, at 18:24, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 27.10.2012, at 18:15, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >> How does this affect freestanding implementations? > > This transform is disabled with -fno-builtin or -ffreestanding. Thinking a bit more about this, it looks like the way -ffreestanding is implemented in clang is

On 17.06.2013, at 15:56, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > On 2013-06-15 16:39 , Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> Do you want to take over this effort or should I poke more at it? > > Since you've already started, it's easier if you poke more at it. Thanks. I've got a whole bunch of other things to go through. OK, will do. Jakob any comments on the

On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer >>> <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 11.01.2013, at

Hi Ben, That did help. I continue to notice the virtual register in the program. I use LLVM 3.4. The program i am looking at is a very simple one. Listed below int global_var; int *global_ptr; int32_t main(int32_t argc, char ** argv){ int p = 10; int k = 20; int *pp; char *c_pp; pp = &k; global_ptr = pp; pp = &p; global_ptr = &global_var; return 0; } BR/Nizam

Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of "subscribe". Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your mailer's "Reply" feature. icecast+confirm+1076405509.4977.3d207b@xiph.org Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org mailing lists,

Hi Samba User Group Maybe that's a stupid question, however i have a severe problem with that. I'm running samba 2.0.4b on suse linux 6.1 and windows nt4 sp4, german version. I need the domain admin to be a member of the local admin group, If I log into the local domain as admin I cannot add the domain admin to the local admin group, because of miising privledges in the domain. If I log

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer

On Jun 17, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 17.06.2013, at 15:56, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > >> On 2013-06-15 16:39 , Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>> Do you want to take over this effort or should I poke more at it? >> >> Since you've already started, it's easier if you poke more at