search for: kidnaps

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Yeah, I can see it now :( I guess that the ship has sailed and we are > stuck with this ugly thing forever... > > Could you at least make some common code that is shared in between > netvsc and virtio_net so this is handled in exacly the same way in both? IMHO netvsc is a vendor specific driver which made a mistake on what

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Yeah, I can see it now :( I guess that the ship has sailed and we are > stuck with this ugly thing forever... > > Could you at least make some common code that is shared in between > netvsc and virtio_net so this is handled in exacly the same way in both? IMHO netvsc is a vendor specific driver which made a mistake on what

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -----= --------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 14541 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachment= s/20070409/75fedbb1/attachment.gif

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -----= --------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 14541 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachment= s/20070409/75fedbb1/attachment.gif

Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Yeah, I can see it now :( I guess that the ship has sailed and we are >> stuck with this ugly thing forever... >> >> Could you at least make some common code that is shared in between >> netvsc and virtio_net so this is handled in exacly the same

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> Yeah, I can see it now :( I guess that the ship has sailed and we are >>> stuck with this ugly thing forever... >>> >>> Could you at least make some

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> Yeah, I can see it now :( I guess that the ship has sailed and we are >>> stuck with this ugly thing forever... >>> >>> Could you at least make some

Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>>> Yeah, I can see it now :( I guess that the ship has sailed and we are >>>>

> Hi folks, > My SMB server is a Helios Ethershare 3.1 on a Tru64 Alpha machine. > We are now integrating more and more gentoo-Linux Servers. These are the > SMB Clients. > > On Obelix (one of our gentoo-Servers) I can mount the SMB Volume from the > Ethershare Server. > obelix nc4smb # whoami > root > obelix # mount -t smbfs -o username=m.heckmann

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl

Hi all, We have the following setup : PDC (samba/ldap) BDC's this was all originally setup on 2.0.9 and was working fine. We upgraded to 2.0.20 a few days now wbinfo doens't work. We use usrmgr.exe for admin and no users show up and only the BULTIN groups show up. zeus ~ # wbinfo -u Error looking up domain users zeus ~ # wbinfo -g BUILTIN/Print Operators BUILTIN/Backup Operators

Hi, I wonder if it's possible to setup wine so that applications using NT Authentification (NTLM) (secur32.dll and security.dll) may work ? I'm trying the radmin tools and the win32 computer that are using radmin use the NT security protocol to allow login. Actually i've tried using WINEDEBUG='warn+all' and WINEDEBUG='+loaddll' to replace the core dll of windows

On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 14:02:01 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 07.09.18 um 12:45 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:22:36 +0200 > > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> At a customer server (gentoo linux, so far only

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:56:35PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck

Hi, more than a month ago I proposed an addition to the HOWTO to address a certain packet classification problem/bug and how to fix it (see http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016728.html). I never received any reaction from the HOWTO maintainers, not even when addressing them directly (see mail below). Given that a month has gone by: Is the HOWTO currently unmaintained? Regards,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:56:35PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri