search for: kadafax

Hi list, I''m totally new at xen and apologize for my ignorance. What I''m trying to do is the following: I''ve got a laptop with core 2 duo cpu. Dom0: Fedora Core 6. Dom1: WinXP HVM I want to give the Dom1 full access to the wifi card, and the possibility to use USB pen drive. So I''ve hidden the pci address (according to lspci output) in the kernel''s

On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? I suppose it will. > > Diff between 2 emails: > next uid = 30104 | nex...

hi everyone, However, how can I verify that solr is working properly? Background: - I'm trying to setup 2.1 with fts_solr and eventually test maildir/mdbox. - I used the following webpage as reference to setup solr: http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com/2012/02/19/full-text-search-with-solr-and-dovecot-on-ubuntu-10-04/ I'm looking at /var/log/tomcat6/catalina.out file, but see

On 28/05/2018 13:23, kfx wrote: > On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com >> <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new >&g...

Hi list, Here it is: I have compiled with no problem courier-imap-4.0.4 on this arch (x86_64). Now I want to update my install with 4.0.6. I want to do this because the server is not yet in a production state, so if a major flaw affects courier-imap in the future, I could react more quickly. And indeed I'm encountering problems with the make process (Since I initialy build courier-imap

On 06.09.2018 22:25, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > I necro-bump this thread as I have the same problem since I switched to LMTP from LDA (as the wiki recommend). > Any news to make dovecot LMTP postix compliant ? > > > Le 08/11/2016 ? 17:13, Noah Tilton a ?crit?: >> >> I was wondering whether there...

Hi, I'm using RHEL4 and since the dovecot RPM is present in the main repository, I'm thinking about switching from courier-imap (with whom I've got trouble to update) to Dovecot. Here are two questions about Dovecot (google didn't answer me): 1. Is it possible for dovecot to use the bind mecanism against ldap for authentification purpose. My main concern is to avoid the

On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com > <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? >>> I suppo...

Hi list, I have a SAN attached to a CentOS 4.2 server. I have expanded the size of the virtual disk within the SAN (by adding a new HD to the disk pool) and need CentOS to see the new size (CentOS see it as /dev/sdb). I'm using LVM. Do you know a method for the Volume Group to see that one of its harddisk is now bigger, without rebooting (it's not a problem with a reboot but since

Hi list, I'm a bit worried here. On a server, Centos 4.3 fully-patched SELinux activated, Osiris (a decentralized scanner for files changes on distant servers) signaled me several changes on files who were not (at first sight) affected by a recent update (the list is below). Is there a logic explanation for those changes to happen ? The "rpm -Va" command does not output md5sum

On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > > Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? > > Same (wrong) result: > 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body > > 2. Search against "too6Ouka"...

can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Aki On 21.05.2018 13:31, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: >> That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual >> user. >> >> How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated >> automatically? > I send an email conta...

I was wondering whether there is a roadmap for adding SMTPUTF8 support to Dovecot? My delivery pattern is Postfix -> Dovecot LMTP and it is choking on utf8 messages. I might be able to volunteer some of my time as a developer. Another thread about this seemed to go unanswered: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-September/105474.html

Hi list, I have the choice to use RHEL4 or Centos4.x on a Dell PowerEdge2850 who is linked to an AX100 storage system. My question is: does the QLA200 (the pci fiber channel card) driver will work on CentOS 4.1 . For now the card is listed like this on CentOS 4.1: --- #lspci 09:04.0 Fibre Channel: QLogic Corp.: Unknown device 6312 (rev 03) --- What kind of modification must/can I do to the

Hi list, This post is slightly OT, I hope no one will take offense. I was following the wiki on using dovecot LDA with postfix and implemented, for our future mail server, the address extensions mechanism: an email sent to "validUser+foldername at mydomain.com" will have dovecot-lda automagically create and subscribe the "foldername" folder. With some basic scripting I was

Le 31/03/13 16:26, Timo Sirainen a ?crit : > On 27.3.2013, at 18.01, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > >> Just to bump the OP message as I experience the exact same symptom with the same configuration. That is: when moving an email to a virtual mailboxes, dovecot crash (and sometime the email disappears from the real mailbox). > I'm guessing your error was diffe...

Hi list, This issue was raised here by John Fawcett on 12/02/19 but got no response. So, as I'm facing the same issue, I would like to try again: When using the vacation sieve extension, if I send an email to user.name at mydomain.com it will work, but not to User.Name at mydomain.com. Is there a way to make the user part case insensitive so that the vacation auto-reply is fired whatever

Hello, I'm trying this here first before moving to the apache list. Maybe someone of you use mod_authnz_ldap with multiple ldap servers declaration for redundancy. With one server declared it is working. Here is what I've tried for adding another one (space separated as read in the apache's doc) : .... AuthLDAPURL

Hi list, here is what happened: today I noticed some resolution's problems on my network. I did a "service named status" and here was the output: # /etc/init.d/named status rndc: connection to remote host closed This may indicate that the remote server is using an older version of the command protocol, this host is not authorized to connect, or the key is invalid. In the

Hi list, Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account I have these 2 errors messages: -bash: [: =: unary operator expected -bash: [: -le: unary operator expected After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d: /etc/profile.d/krb5-workstation.sh /etc/profile.d/vim.sh The problem is with the test where the command "id" is involved,