kadafax
2005-Dec-14 16:03 UTC
[Dovecot] Thinking about switching from courier-imap to Dovecot: 2 simple questions
Hi, I'm using RHEL4 and since the dovecot RPM is present in the main repository, I'm thinking about switching from courier-imap (with whom I've got trouble to update) to Dovecot. Here are two questions about Dovecot (google didn't answer me): 1. Is it possible for dovecot to use the bind mecanism against ldap for authentification purpose. My main concern is to avoid the clear-text password in the dovecot-ldap.conf file. With courier-imap, the process simply bind to the ldap tree with the users's supplied login/password. No need for a special authentification purpose user. 2. Does imap's dovecot implementation support folders imbrication (more than one level folders) ? Thanks, kfx.
Timo Sirainen
2005-Dec-14 20:54 UTC
[Dovecot] Thinking about switching from courier-imap to Dovecot: 2 simple questions
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 15:03 +0100, kadafax wrote:> 1. Is it possible for dovecot to use the bind mecanism against ldap for > authentification purpose. My main concern is to avoid the clear-text > password in the dovecot-ldap.conf file. With courier-imap, the process > simply bind to the ldap tree with the users's supplied login/password. > No need for a special authentification purpose user.Only with PAM + pam_ldap module currently.> 2. Does imap's dovecot implementation support folders imbrication (more > than one level folders) ?Sure. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20051214/11558c19/attachment.pgp
Apparently Analagous Threads
- managesieve : unable to authenticate with cram-md5
- Helps!!!!! Rails database connection guru needed!!!!!!!
- Bug: Dovecot index loosing sync with FTS despite "fts_autoindex = yes"
- Large Roaming profiles
- Bug: Dovecot index loosing sync with FTS despite "fts_autoindex = yes"