search for: jroelof

I'm having trouble pushing commits since the transition from svn => git. I talked to Chris Lattner and got my github user (github.com/jroelofs) added to the group, but that doesn't seem to be enough. Here are some logs from trying a test commit. Can anyone spot what's wrong? https://gist.github.com/jroelofs/ca89232420e3ecb9b466b9ba7047185c Cheers, Jon Roelofs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scru...

> On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jroelofs.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 2/3/15 12:08 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote: > >> Other issues not tracked by bugs: >> >> * CMake builds for libc++? > Can you elaborate... what do you mean by this? AFAIK this already works. Duncan made a comment on IRC...

...x combinations that are not explicitly supported (in the docs), but appear (maybe) useful. For these, there is some precedent on mitigating them within FileCheck itself [4], though the combinatorial explosion warrants being careful about how we go about detecting them (if at all). -- Jon Roelofs jroelofs at jroelofs.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200403/a025677c/attachment.html>

On Jan 31, 2015 08:42, "Jonathan Roelofs" <jroelofs.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > My worry is the scenario of throwing in one dso, then running a cleanup as you're unwinding through another dso. If that cleanup throws, and invokes a different unwinder, there's no way for that second unwinder to know about the state of the first. If thi...

On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > >> On 2015 Feb 3, at 13:26, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jroelofs.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2/3/15 12:08 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote: >>> >>>> Other issues not tracked by bugs: >>>> >>>> * CMake builds for libc++? >>> Can you elaborate... what do yo...

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:29 AM Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > I was always assuming that the suggested commit is assembled in the > PHP code run by arcanist command run locally. If indeed the arc > command requests the commit message from the server, I assumed so too until I went digging for it. Seems the client-side stuff only deals with the structured data,

...th a simple immediate, is it safe to search the BB and replace other uses of the same immediate with the reg? In my case this gives a code size reduction. The search would stop on finding another use of the scavenged register. Thanks, -steve On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jroelofs.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 1/29/15 2:00 PM, Steve King wrote: >> >> Hello LLVM, >> The ARM target sometimes adds an instruction with a virtual register >> in eliminateFrameIndex(): >> >> >> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/mast...

On 1/31/15 5:36 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 31 Jan 2015, at 03:02, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: >> Talked it over with Saleem on IRC, and I've come around to thinking libunwind is a better default for --rtlib=compiler-rt. Reason being that --rtlib=compiler-rt means libgcc probably isn't even available. > > It's not just that, it's about making

The following web say the libc++abi is ready on arm.http://libcxxabi.llvm.org/spec.html I try to build libc++ and libc++abi for host x86_64(linux) and target arm(linux) but fail.I have read the web http://llvm.org/docs/HowToCrossCompileLLVM.html Does anyone know whether it's available for my need? If you know how to build, what is the build options you use? Best regards cschen --------------

...ister allocation. For this purpose I added support for this attribute in clang and clang codegen this attribute as target dependent attribute and add to declaration. Then IPRA constructs regmask from this and use during the optimization. How ever after disussion on IRC with Joerg Sonnenberger and jroelofs we think that this may effect other areas too. So it would be better to discuss this and implement this as we all agree upon it. Sincerely, Vivek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160715/e0176...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "jroelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com>, "Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es>, > "David Chisnall" <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>, "chandlerc" <chandlerc at gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:20:55 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVM...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "jroelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com>, "Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es>, > "David Chisnall" <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>, "chandlerc" <chandlerc at gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 11:25:30 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVM...

On 31 Jan 2015, at 03:02, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: > Talked it over with Saleem on IRC, and I've come around to thinking libunwind is a better default for --rtlib=compiler-rt. Reason being that --rtlib=compiler-rt means libgcc probably isn't even available. It's not just that, it's about making it self-contained. In a system with both gcc and llvm

...We can always use a suitable system version, if we find one, instead of rebuilding a version we ship. -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Chisnall" <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> > To: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > Cc: "jroelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com>, "Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es>, "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:22:09 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0 > > On 11 Ma...

So I started prototyping remote testing for libcxx over the weekend: https://github.com/jroelofs/libcxx/tree/remote_test The SSHExecutor isn't quite finished yet, but this should give an idea of what I've got in mind. Does this look generic enough to work for other projects under the llvm-umbrella (LNT, test-suite, compiler_rt, libcxxabi, etc)? Are there use cases that you see w...

On 8 September 2014 23:06, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure we're on the same page... Your example, and the way that lit >> is currently set up, assumes BUILD and HOST are the same machine. > > or, at least, it assumes that lit is running on HOST. Isn't that the point? So lit can use "qemu-arm arm-linux-gnu-clang

On 11 March 2015 at 14:07, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: >> 3. Ninja "pool = console" would fix the timeout issues on slow builds, >> but it's not clear how CMake would do that by default > > I'm not sure I understand the second part of that statement. As far as I know, all we have to do is add USES_TERMINAL to the appropriate

On 11 March 2015 at 14:38, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > I agree that it's too new to make it the minimum version. It's just a feature you'll get if CMake is new enough and will gracefully handle older CMake's. I imagine that I could add the magic CMake options to my buildbot's configuration on builders.py and locally install CMake 3.2 on them

On 1/29/15 2:00 PM, Steve King wrote: > Hello LLVM, > The ARM target sometimes adds an instruction with a virtual register > in eliminateFrameIndex(): > > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseRegisterInfo.cpp > > This looks late for a virtual register to appear. Where is this vreg made real? The register scavenger should take care of such

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM Jon Roelofs via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, May 6, 2016, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On 6 May 2016 at 19:34, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>