search for: jamesmead

...ally see, if you are usings @your_objects.stubs().... is something like: NoMethodError: You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! The error occurred while evaluating nil.stub ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-04-11 14:24 Message: I''ve just tried to reproduce this bug with both recent and old versions of Mocha, but without success. Can you let me know if you are still seeing the bug? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James...

I''m getting the following exceptions when running mongrel_rails. Any ideas what might be causing the problem? Error details... $ mongrel_rails /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-0.3.3/lib/mongrel/command.rb:168:in `run'': When creating '''': undefined method `downcase'' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from

...the #to_s method, so the inheritted #to_s in Mocha::Mock should either be removed, or some explicit behaviour added which can handle setting expectations for methods already present on that object. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-04-11 14:07 Message: Sorry for the delayed response. I think this was fixed in revision 86 which should have made it into release 0.4. Can you let me know if this is still broken? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Mead (j...

...------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kornelius Kalnbach (murphy) Date: 2007-12-23 00:56 Message: can you compile a gem (1.0.0 please ;) and mail it to me so I can test it here? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-12-23 00:44 Message: Ok. I''m pretty sure that bug is already fixed in trunk. I guess it could be time to release another gem. I''ll get to it as soon as I have some time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Korne...

...1.9 Compatibility Initial Comment: Ruby 1.9 Compatibility Tested on * ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [universal-darwin9.0] * ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-11 patchlevel 0) [i686-darwin9.1.0] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-12-20 15:48 Message: Thanks for your help. I''ve tested and applied your patch and fixed a few other warnings in revision 206 of trunk. Cheers, James. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/t...

...f initialize(matcher) @matcher = matcher end def ==(parameter) !(matcher == parameter) end def mocha_inspect "not(#{@matcher.mocha_inspect})" end end ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-10-25 13:01 Message: Hi Jerry, Thanks for the suggestions. I had wanted to add not() a while ago, but ran into the keyword issue. I''ve just committed revision 191 with Not() instead. It isn''t great, but it''s the best I can think of at the moment. What do y...

...''test/unit'' require ''mocha'' class MyTest < Test::Unit::TestCase def test_never o = stub_everything o.expects(:x).never o.x end end ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-06-30 13:33 Message: You are quite right. Thanks for the bug report. In fact there are a few issues related to this. I need to have a bit of a think about it... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tr...

...def exists? - stubbee.respond_to?(method) + def exists? + #stubbee.respond_to?(method) + (stubbee.methods | stubbee.private_methods).include?(method.to_s) end end ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-04-11 14:31 Message: I don''t know whether you have noticed, but this has accidentally become possible in more recent versions of Mocha! However, I intend to reintroduce the restriction soon. Stubbing private methods is not in general a good idea, because it couples your test t...

...3 Submitted By: Jerrett Taylor (ennoia) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: ability to specify call order Initial Comment: something like flexmock''s "ordered(n)" would be handy! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-04-11 14:39 Message: Specifying the expected order of invocations been on the todo list for quite a while - hopefully we''ll get round to it soon! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/...

...end end But it''s suprising to me that mocha would do something like change the behavior of to_s for a widely-used class like Range. My real fix would be to remove to_s completely. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-02-02 13:07 Message: You''re absolutely right. Renamed Range#to_s implementation to #mocha_inspect and checked first and last respond_to?(:to_f) as you suggested. Sorry for the delay - I wasn''t monitoring these trackers. Should be fixed in revision 99 of trunk....

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 7 Sep 2007 22:43 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #13763, was opened at 2007-09-07 17:43 You can respond by visiting:

...turn the value with is returned by the yield block. The code: baz = foo.with_something do |bar| bar.get_baz.to_s end is real code which I want to test with a mocked foo & bar objects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-04-11 07:03 Message: Hi Erik, Thanks for the bug report & suggested patch. To be honest I can''t see anything wrong with Mocha''s behaviour in the example you''ve given. It''s not obvious what you are trying to test. Can you not do something like...

...ne patch for implementation and > please also enhance the documentation and examples to show how > responds_like is supposed to be used. > > Thanks, > > Glenn > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) > Date: 2007-06-15 09:44 > > Message: > Many thanks. You are quite right. I had forgotten about the > responds_like functionality. I''m not 100% sure it''s complete! I''ve > fixed the warning and switched warnings on in the rake test tasks > to hi...

Cool. Thanks for letting me know. On 21 Jul 2007, at 09:20, Chris O''Sullivan wrote: > Heya James, > > I thought you''d like to know that Mocha featured in the latest > Railscasts. > > Check it out here: http://railscasts.com/episodes/60 > > -Chris >

Mocha 0.5.2 now tagged in svn repos. Begin forwarded message: > From: James Mead <james.mead at mail.com> > Date: 21 July 2007 10:21:11 BDT > To: Zach Dennis <zach.dennis at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Tagging Mocha 0.5.x > > Hi Zach, > > Thanks for pointing that out. I''ve just tagged 0.5.2 and will try > to retrofit earlier tags as soon as I can.

Hi Antonio, My environment is OS X 10.4.8. Thanks a lot for looking into the problem. Please let me know if I can do anything to help. I have had problems previously with tar including Mac resource fork files. Could this be what is causing your problem? James. On 24 Jul 2007, at 20:42, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi James, > > First of all, thanks for mocha, it''s a really