search for: jallison

...: SAMBA digest 1937 > > SAMBA Digest 1937 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) a browsing question > by genght@cn.ibm.com > 2) Samba 2.0.0 release soon > by Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> > 3) oplock_break with samba 2.0 > by Maurice Agavnian <agavnian@cegelec-red.fr> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 09:39:25 +0800 > From: genght@cn.ibm.com > To: samba@samb...

I am running samba version 1.9.18p4 on a sinix machine (unix svr4). My NT workstations use the german code page 850. In earlier versions of samba (1.9.17p2) the character mapping worked just fine, using character set = iso8859-1 client code page = 850 in my smb.conf. Since upgrading to samba 1.9.18p4 this don't work any more. Is this a known problem? I tripple-checked my smb.conf entries,

Hi! updated to p4 the other day, and now the "character set = iso8859-1" option doesn't work anymore. I didn't change anything in the smb.conf file but this: unix password sync = True time server = yes and it worked in 1.9.18p3 :/ Has anyone else seen this? Samba runs on FreeBSD 2.2.6 from the ports collection. (I don't think that password sync works for this

Hi, Anyone know where I can get a .tar.gz of 2.0.2? I'd like this version, since the PDC code is reportedly more stable than 2.0.3. Or has this been fixed in 2.0.3? Thanks, -- Seeya, Paul ---- plussier@baynetworks.com Broadband Technology Division - Bay Networks (now a Nortel Company, Eh? :) If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!

...or two ago, Great writeup!! I was a little surprised that they ran such a glowing review of samba, with some of the negative implications on NT. It is very nice to see Microsoft show an interest in interoperability. -Steve Roylance > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Allison [SMTP:jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 6:41 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine publishes > Samba article. > > Ok, so MCP magazine published my "What is Samba" article (although > it looks like the...

...te the semaphore > [1999/08/06 11:36:49, 0] locking/locking.c:locking_init(174) > ERROR: Failed to initialise share modes Try this fix (it causes Samba to do a lookup on root and check the correct gid_t rather than just assuming 0). Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. --- /usr/people/jallison/src/samba-2/samba/source/locking/shmem_sysv.c Wed Jul 14 09:40:38 1999 +++ locking/shmem_sysv.c Thu Jul 29 10:41:15 1999 @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ /******************************************************************* open the shared memory ***************************************************...

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

Hi, I am getting this log entry in the nmb.log file. Any ideas why I am getting it? query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 9.36. 220.43 for name WHITE<1d>. This response was from IP 9.36.223.255 Thanks Chip

We are having a problem with Microsoft visual C++ compiling source code maintained on a samba server. Occasionaly the compiler reports that it cant open the file vc50.pch. The samba server is running on a freebsd box. Taking a look at the log files it looks like when the operation fails the server is processing the command open (vc50.pch for exclusive use write setattrE write open (vc50.pch

...w confirm? (BTW, nice "virtual" interview in Linux Journal a couple issues back; it was good for a few hearty chuckles, and *very* informative) When the world was young, various folks carved some runes like this: > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 10:13:59 -0700 > From: Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> > To: tl@fairplay.no, "samba@samba.anu.edu.au" > Subject: Re: Slowdown when copying large files (PR#8624) > > tl@fairplay.no wrote: > > > Hmm, I missed the original post, but this sounds like be the > > it could bug I reported 15 days...

...server MAILHEIDELBERG<20> at IP <deleted> for workgroup DIGIBILD Connecting to <deleted> at port 139 sync_browse_lists: MAILHEIDELBERG rejected the browse sync sessionsetup I found the following in the archives: ------------------------------------------------- Jeremy Allison (jallison@whistle.com) Tue, 7 Apr 1998 11:33:40 +1000 Greg Patten wrote: > > We've got two samba servers either side of a modem link and I'm trying .... The browse sync connection should be made as an anonymous (guest) user - so check guest is allowed on the IPC$ share. ----------------------...

...You need to be willing to talk about the use of Samba in your organization, and it's co-existance with (or replacement of) NT. If you fit the criteria, and are willing to contribute to the story, please send your Name, email, daytime phone number, site details and contact info to me at : jallison@whistle.com and I'll forward them to the senior infoworld editor who's putting the article together. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle...

estewart@dudley.lib.usf.edu wrote: > > On an Ultra 1 running Solaris 2.6 and using gcc 2.8.1 > > ipc.c: In function `api_RNetServerEnum': > ipc.c:1194: warning: passing arg 4 of `qsort' from incompatible pointer > type > > Compiling nmbd_incomingrequests.c > nmbd_incomingrequests.c: In function `process_node_status_request': >

...he master sources. I wasn't sure how many people are using the username map parameter but I thought I'd be on the safe side and broadcast the fix anyway, in case people run into it. Apologies, Jeremy Allison. Samba Team. -------------------cut here---------------------------- --- /home/jallison/tmp/samba-1.9.18p8/source/username.c Fri Jun 12 18:44:21 1998 +++ username.c Mon Jun 15 14:51:32 1998 @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ ********************************************************************/ BOOL map_username(char *user) { - static int depth=0; static BOOL initialised=False; static fstring...

I have a problem with new version (1.9.18p8) of SAMBA and username mapping. Configuration: WindowsNT 4.0 Workstation + SP1 WindowsNT domain - NTEP01 is PDC Digital UNIX 3.2C Username on NT: Babor Username on UNIX: baborl In SMB.CONF I have following lines: [global] security = server password server = NTEP01 username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map username.map: baborl = babor

Phillip.Link@alcatel.fr wrote: > The problem > ----------- > I've been trying to install the latest samba distrib (2.0.5a) on a hpux > 10.20 machine, but the connection times out, apparently because of > shared memory access. > > Trying to make an smbclient connection (or using the windows nt explorer > to connect generates the following log.smb (smbd launched as smbd

SUBJECT: SAMBA digest 1700 ERROR: Text size exceeds maximum

...t; > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) msaccess and samba prob solved - thanx > by "Paul Thomsen" <paul@nungalinya.edu.au> > 2) Re: File Locking (PR#18687) > by Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> > 3) Re: oplock problem (PR#18690) > by Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> > 4) File Locking > by Chris Burgess <burbros@uq.net.au> > 5) Re: Advice on accessing CD changer disks via Samba > by "Stephen L Arnold" <...

I recently installed samba 1.9.18p8. Since then, we get the following error: "No domain server was available to validate your password. You may not be able to gain access to some network resources." after the server has been running for >48 hours. If I stop and restart the server, everything is ok again. Our samba server is a Sun Ultra 2170 running Solaris 2.5.1. Any help will

Jay.Anderson@dw.deere.com wrote: > I believe the problem that occurs is that oplocks are left hanging on > the server, and are never removed. After a period of time, all the > shared memory that is allocated to file locking is filled, and the > server starts sending garbage back to the clients when they request > locks, confusing the clients and creating all sorts of strange