search for: ispbrasil

...3a Leftover inexact backtrace: Inexact backtrace: [<c0405c73>] show_trace+0xd/0x10 [<c0405cb1>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<c043646e>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xa4/0x120 [<c0404e67>] restore_all+0x37/0x3a any help ? -------------------- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail: itamar@ispbrasil.com.br msn: itamarjp@starmedia.com skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 34 3238 3845 +55 11 4063 5033 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...3a Leftover inexact backtrace: Inexact backtrace: [<c0405c73>] show_trace+0xd/0x10 [<c0405cb1>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<c043646e>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xa4/0x120 [<c0404e67>] restore_all+0x37/0x3a any help ? -------------------- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail: itamar@ispbrasil.com.br msn: itamarjp@starmedia.com skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 34 3238 3845 +55 11 4063 5033 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello everybody, i have found, that i can limit the OUTGOING bandwidth with the option "rate=" (e.g. rate=250KB/s) at the vif line in my sxp-file. I have tested it, it is working good, but why it is "only" limiting the outgoing bandwidth ? Is there any easy way to limit the incoming bandwidth too, something like the obove option ? My network setup is bridged. Thank you in

hi, i''m trying move from file: based disk to tap:aio but things don''t work i have centos4 dom0 with centos4 domU xen 3.0.4-testing changeset: 13138:d401cb96d8a0 self compiled [root@xen linux-2.6.16.38-xen]# grep XEN_BLKDEV_TAP .config CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_TAP=m config disk = [ ''file:/var/lib/xen/test.img,hda1,w'',

Just gave 3.0 a spin. Had been running 2.0.7 for the past 3 months or so without problems (aside from intermittent failure during live migration). Anyway, 3.0 seems to have an issue with my machine. It starts up the 4 domains that I''ve got defined (was running 6 user domains with 2.0.7, but two of those were running 2.4 kernels which I can''t seem to build with Xen 3.0 yet, and

On 2015-11-18 19:41, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Kwan Lowe <kwan.lowe at gmail.com> wrote: try systemd-nspawn and use it instead of virtualizing, will save you some bits of memory.

Message from syslogd@router at Mon Sep 19 14:53:09 2005 ... router kernel: flags:0x40000100 mapping:c180232c mapcount:0 count:0 (Not tainted) Itamar Reis Peixoto +55 (34) 3238 3845 e-mail : itamar@ispbrasil.com.br http://vps.ispbrasil.com.br --->>> servidores linux _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

HVM = fully virtualized. The question is, why are you using fully virtualized domUs? Why not paravirtualized (PV)? >>> On 2008/06/16 at 16:07, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@SoftDux.com> wrote: Itamar - IspBrasil wrote: > why you''re using hvm ? its slow > > > > Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I''m running CentOS 5.1 x64 + Xen 3.0 & I have setup a CentOS 5.1 x64 >> domU as a HMV. For the setup I used VNC, but I would prefer to be >> able...

hello, i just installed windows2003 as domU on Xen 3.0.3 using virt-manager. after finished install, now i can see windows login screen. but i can''t send ctrl+alt+del signal to guestOS which is windows2003. is there any key map for this? thank you. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...OOP_SET_FD: Device or resource busy [2005-09-19 16:40:21 xend] ERROR (process:37) [block-file] ioctl: LOOP_SET_FD: Device or resource busy [2005-09-19 16:40:21 xend] ERROR (process:37) [block-file] ioctl: LOOP_SET_FD: Device or resource busy Itamar Reis Peixoto +55 (34) 3238 3845 e-mail : itamar@ispbrasil.com.br _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello, Is it normal that eth0 in domain0 is in promisc mode ? [root@vmaster ~]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0B:CD:4D:C4:8A inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Bcast:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask: 255.255.255.248 inet6 addr: fe80::20b:cdff:fe4d:c48a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3602633 errors:0

Good morning from Singapore, This is of paramount importance. Would Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS, and Fedora remain open source/free software after IBM buys Red Hat for $34 Billion? ===BEGIN SIGNATURE=== Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017 [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3]

Hi folks, I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs ecryptfs 85424 0 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# yum -q repolist id del repositorio nombre del repositorio

Why do you say so? ________________________________ From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 12:04 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open Source/Free Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion? On 10/31/18 12:44 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Good morning from Singapor...

Hi all I''m running CentOS 5.1 x64 + Xen 3.0 & I have setup a CentOS 5.1 x64 domU as a HMV. For the setup I used VNC, but I would prefer to be able to access it via "xm console cPanel" via SSH directly. Here''s the output cPanel HVM: [root@pc-00059 ~]# more /etc/xen/cPanel name = "cPanel" uuid = "ff940501-507d-04ca-e590-831e79ba0397" maxmem =

Hi, The performance of Windows XP is dreadful. Absolutely dreadful. There are only two VMs on the machine, dom0 and domU. The system supports the Windows XP HVM domain through the good offices of the underlying dual-core AMD cpu with AMD-V technology. The system spends a huge amount of time running rundll32.exe. If I kill the executable, it speeds up a bit. The performance problem has been

Does anyone know if the Xen 3.1.0 kernels as distributed in the "open source" tarballs (x86_64 version) are vulnerable to the recently-announced vulnerability CVE-2007-4573? IF so, is there any plan to release patched tarballs anytime soon? Thanks Steve Timm -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 timm@fnal.gov

On 09/08/2015 06:41 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> What we really need is to make the REAL xen RPMs .. the ones produced in >> this SIG .. work with systemd. These RPMs are produced by Citrix, so we >> need to get the right. > > Just to be clear -- RPMs are produced by the CentOS Virt

Hello all, I''m trying to get my servers to work with Xen, but as I use sata2, it looks like only a recent kernel will do the job. But unferotunately, ony and official 2.6.8 is provided, which doesn''t boot at all on those machines. I''ve tried ubuntu''s 2.6.22-xen, but ti looks very buggy. Where could we find patches for 2.6.22/23 to add Xen? How could I gete a

Hi, I am having problems establishing an adsl connection in dom0 (but ONLY in dom0, without xen everything is ok). Following is my setup/situation: 1. Installed clean Fedora 7 (with virtualization option selected) 2. Booted with the non-xen kernel & setup adsl. Adsl connection works without any problems. 3. Rebooted with xen kernel into dom0. 4. adsl connection can no longer be activated