search for: inherant

Hi, I was trying to install Rfast package in iMac (OS HIGH SIERRA) from source. However the installation fails with below message. Rfast is an essential package for various other packages in R Could you please help how to resolve this error? Thankss for your help > install.packages("/Volumes/WDStorage/NAS Download/Rfast_2.0.8.tar.gz", repos = NULL) * installing *source* package

It's past 3 AM here, so maybe I really shouldn't be answering in this state of awakeness. However, what I understand from your example is that loops with counters must be entered from another block in order to use the phi instruction correctly, not that it should be invalid to branch to the entry block. It seems to me that it makes sense to go back to the entry point if looping is not

I'm having another play with LLVM using the OCaml bindings for a forthcoming OCaml Journal article and I have a couple of remarks: Firstly, I noticed that the execute engine is very slow, taking milliseconds to call a JIT compiled function. Is this an inherent overhead or am I calling it incorrectly or is this something that can be optimized in the OCaml bindings? Secondly, I happened to

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> > On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Adve, Vikram Sadanand via llvm-dev

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop at googlemail.com> wrote: > Firstly, I noticed that the execute engine is very slow, taking milliseconds > to call a JIT compiled function. Is this an inherent overhead or am I calling > it incorrectly or is this something that can be optimized in the OCaml > bindings? What is the signature of the function you are

Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> writes: > I was not suggesting that you rely on pattern matching predication for > correctness.  As you point out, that's obviously incorrect.  I was > assuming that you have a correct but slow lowering for the select > form.  I was suggesting your ISEL attempt to use a predicated > instruction where possible for performance.

On 01/19/2017 03:36 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On Jan 19, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org >> <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Mehdi Amini<mehdi.amini at apple.com >> <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>>wrote: >> >> >>>

I am working on setting up a global boot server that serves up files across the WAN. I am running into a 5 minute timer that is rebooting my hosts before they can complete the kernel and initrd file download. The servers in questions are HP DL60s, and they use UEFI. I am using syslinux.efi version 6.03. They get the kernel file from the TFTP server in about 2 ? minutes, then get 2 ? more minutes

On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 19:17 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > That would be the same as killing scp? Better that... than having an inherently insecure scp... or at least make it absolutely clear and rename it to i[nsecure]scp. If the core functionality of a program (which is here probably the "secure") is no longer given, then it's IMO better to rather cause breakage (at least for

Over the last couple of weeks I have seen a thread about remotely rebooting SIP phones from Asterisk. Is there something inherent in Asterisk that *requires* that SIP phones to be rebooted in a particular scenario, or is it just so that phones can pickup new firmware and/or configuration from their boot server? TIA.

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for your response. Given a worst case scenario, what is the "worst case" latency (in terms of Speex frames) that the jitter buffer algorithm will incur? We're trying to determine the worst case hard number. Sorry for unclear question below; what I was trying to ask is that given a worst case latency (which I'm asking in the first question) inherent in

I decided to take a stab at 6601421 dladm set-linkprop should support multiple -p options along with some related linkprop fixes, but when I looked into dladm.c, was surprised to find that "dladm_parse_props()" is called from do_create_aggr and do_create_vlan in addition to the expected (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions. What happened here? Why do we pass in

Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> writes: >> Masking has advantages even in the default non-trapping fp >> environment: It is not uncommon for fp hardware to be slow on >> denormal values. If you take the operation + select approach, >> spurious computation on denomals could occur, slowing down the >> program. > Why?  If you're backend has

Dan Gohman wrote: > On Apr 19, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Greg McGary wrote: > >> Because sextb_r and sextw_r have destination tied to source operands, >> TwoAddressInstructionPass thinks it needs a copy. However, since the >> sext kills its source, the copy is unnecessary. Why does this happen? >> Is TwoAddressInstructionPass relying on a later pass to notice this

I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being installed as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize my Canon scanner connected to a USB port. I did have it running on another computer with C7 so there should not be any inherent issues. On a lark I installed gscan2pdf and sane-backends-drivers-scanners and sane-find-scanner found it: found USB scanner

On 09.03.2012 15:09, yahoo2 wrote: > Uncompressed FLAC is called WAV. really? ;-) the problem is that there is no standarized way to store metadata in a WAVE file, like with FLAC tags / vorbis comments in flac files.... greets KoS

Hi All, On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:04:59PM -0700, Stephen F. Booth wrote: >> I think that what I actually want is for the operating systems to use >> .flac >> instead. Similar to what Mac OS X does with .aiff. This should probably >> have been posted in the advocacy emailing list instead. > > This is an interesting idea. There already is a FUSE filesystem called

I am hoping someone will tak up this chalenge (I am new to R) I have inheritied an R script but need to change it. The script currently includes hardcoded file locations on lines 12,166 and 167. I need to modify this script to allow the folder to be passed as a command line argument to Rscript.exe Can anybody help please? Regards, Ian http://www.nabble.com/file/p25924237/My_script.R

Hello, Is there anyway one can have more than 11 independent variables in a regression model? To hopefully illustrate: with 13 predictors in my model, the last 2 coefficient estimates are "NA". When I view the summary, it indicates that 2 coefficients are "not defined because of singularities". I am using the command: mod <- lm(y ~ ., data = volumes[,3:22]) I am

On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> What FUD? It adds *binary* logfiles, readable only with a separate >> program; when I restart a service, it does not *tell* me what's going on, >> just worked or didn't, so I don't know, if it fails, where, the messages >> from journalctl are extremely