search for: inforced

When does echo 0 > /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum install of some package, it seems to work (not being blocked). When would doing something not work because selinux is watching it (or whatever that process is doing)? Thanks, -wes

...#39; which is not very helpful. To find out which objects there are in the package, I do > ls(pos=2) [1] "brewer.pal" "display.brewer.pal" and there are indeed help for this items. Should there be a rule that there should be help pages for the items in INDEX, maybe inforced by Rcmd check ? Kjetil Halvorsen

I filed this RFE earlier, since there is no way for non sun personel to see this RFE for a while I am posting it here, and asking for feedback from the community. [Fwd: CR 6470231 Created P5 opensolaris/triage-queue Add an inuse check that is inforced even if import -f is used.] Inbox Assign a GTD Label to this Conversation: [Show] Statuses: Next Action, Action, Waiting On, SomeDay, Finished Contexts: Car, Desk, Email, Home, Office, Phone, Waiting References: ProjectHome, Reference Misc.: *Synopsis*: Add an inuse check that is inforced e...

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:52:47 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:42:30 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb

Hi, I'm implementing the built_vector as an IMPLICIT_DEF followed by INSERT_SUBREGs. This approach is the one of the SPARC architecture. def : Pat<(build_vector (f32 fpimm:$a1), (f32 fpimm:$a2)), (INSERT_SUBREG(INSERT_SUBREG (v2f32 (IMPLICIT_DEF)), (i32 (COPY_TO_REGCLASS (MOVSUTO_A_iSLo (bitcast_fpimm_to_i32 f32:$a1)), FPUaOffsetClass)), A_UNIT_PART),

Hi all, I'm using trunk version of LLVM/CLANG. When I compile attached files on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04 LTS system as follows: clang -O2 -g check.c main.c -o check64 When I do gdb check64 and set a breakpoint to the check routine and executes to the breakpoint, I've got: Breakpoint 1, check (result=0x601110, expect=0x601020, n=53) at check.c:7 7 { As you can see I can inspect

On 4/12/2018 8:01 AM, Dominique Torette via llvm-dev wrote: > > But there is one small issue in the inference of RegisterClass of the > implicitly defined register. > > As shown below, the %vreg6<def> is implicitly defined as FPUabRegisterClass. > > This register class accepts the v2f32 type, but for others addressing > mode context this register should be

It looks like Mark and others have addressed the development/CVS issues. We should let their plan be put into effect and give it a chance to work. Regarding the email list: A number of people have suggested creating more email lists. I think this is not a good idea because there will be even more cross posting than there is now between -dev and -users. Several years ago I was a moderator on the

Hi James, clang is able to generate correct debug informations for 64-bit target at -O2. My feeling, given some other experiments I've done, is that debug information generated for x86 32-bit might be broken for parameters as long as they are not 'homed' in the code (local copy to an automatic variable). It seems that when llvm.declare is turned into a llvm.value for parameter there

I read enourmous comment about this questions stating that it was answered before.? I?have been looking for the answer for a week without luck !!!? I searched the archives the xts. vignitte , googled for an answer but couldn't find one so her it is: ? the Vignette states that xts "doesn't inforce the duplicate row requirement" but yet when I try to bring in tick stock data from

Hi James, I fully agree with you and understand your statement about -O2. Now some questions for you: Did you try to reproduce experiments described in my previous e-mail ? Did you look at debug informations generated for 'n' parameter on x86 32-bit & x86 64-bit ? I'm working on my own front-end for LLVM and I had difficulties with debug information when they are related to x86

When I enable callprogress I get this error message... (when I call, it will ring forever but asterisk is acting as if it DID pick up the line ... but it never did... ) I'm beginning to think that asterisk can't hangup the line when in voice mail and this, whatever action I'll take... Actually, callprogress doesn't seem to work at all... (in my case) Mar 24 23:37:28

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi James, > > I fully agree with you and understand your statement about -O2. > > Now some questions for you: > Did you try to reproduce experiments described in my previous e-mail ? > Did you look at debug informations generated for 'n' parameter on x86 32-bit > & x86 64-bit ? >

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:42:30 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 16:41:28 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: > > [...] > > > > In general I don't have a problem with this and if it would make the >

Hello, I have a problem with the render :partial method in all my rails webapplications. I noticed that using render :partial will generate spaces (mainly top spaces) on the elements inserted. As all my websites are seperated by module (basicaly header, content, menu, footer) it''s quite a problem as I have to set negative margin- top to various parts for the site to display as expected

Would you please tell me where to get help. I'm not the ordinary person who will ask for it and bother you just because it isn't convenient to learn from your docs. I CANNOT use Samba because it fails to let me into my Linux server which is running it from my Windows98 network neighborhood icon. It keeps requiring a password. I keep doing what all the docs say to change the password.

Concur ... I reckon that you need a bunch of how tos, that you can sent these rude people. I think that you are a victim of your own success. Samba has hit the mainstream, and now you are paying the price :-) Still ........ I prefer these messages to those filled with hypertext ... or worse.... 2 Meg of mime formatted drivel :-) Has anybody thanked you recently for providing so much help on

Firstly, let me just say I am new to asterisk and if anything I've said is covered in an FAQ or in previous posts I apologise but I have tried searching and I've attempted a few of the things I found but they didn't help. Has anybody got any experience using an X100P on an NTL phone line in the UK (I'm in an ex Cable & Wireless area if that makes any difference). The

Hi Pogo & James, Pogo, that is exactly the kind of answer I was expecting. Thanks for the time you spend on this problem. I myself did also some experimenst and found way to get what I'm expecting but I think that at least for x86 or any parameter passed on the stack for a different architecture the way LLVM handle debug information might be a problem. So here was the situation: My

...firewall zone ($FW) or "all". # # If this column contains ACCEPT, DROP or REJECT and a # corresponding common action is defined in # /etc/shorewall/actions (or /usr/share/shorewall/actions.std) # then that action will be invoked before the policy named in # this column is inforced. # # LOG LEVEL If supplied, each connection handled under the default # POLICY is logged at that level. If not supplied, no # log message is generated. See syslog.conf(5) for a # description of log levels. # # Beginning with Shorewall version 1.3.12, you may # also specify ULOG (must be i...