search for: htbs

Here is what I am trying to do... I want to set it up so any traffic coming or going to a specific host is ran through 3 HTBs. Two of the HTBs are for limiting incoming and out going and I want them to then dump the traffic into the third for limiting overall bandwidth for that host. I have been using tc filter to put it into the HTBs for incoming and out going, but am having problems getting it to then dump that into the...

I''ve been having a bit of difficulty with a hierarchy of HTBs that I''m wanting to create. Essentially, I''ve got one interface that goes to both the DMZ and the internet. When going to the internet, some of the traffic will be going through a VPN and therefore I want to prioritize it differently, however I want to give the DMZ traffic full...

...slowing down and one guy is having a great video and audio feed while someone elses audio only is suffering. I''ve seen some references to wrr and also to making a class for each IP. There doesn''t seem to be much current documention on wrr, so I''m trying to set up nested htbs. Here are my questions: 1. Which makes more sense, to nest my 4 classes of traffic inside of a class for each IP, or to make a class for each IP in each of my 4 classes. I''m leaning towards the latter so that someones web traffic can''t borrow from the interactive traffic classe...

...(the prof. say we can use Open Source Soft. :) or reinvent the wheel). I have been googeling and googeling and i found the l7-filter in source forge and the spectacular simple language that is TCNG. Well the problem is how can i mark packets with netfilter and l7-filter and after that make my HTBs with TCNG. I have read the how to from TCNG (my English is not at 100%) and i see the external program declaration but i think thats not it that i want! In the l7-filter project they talk about TC but TCNG it much more simpler! Can some one help me? (if there are any post in this mailing list ab...

I''m trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I''m getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What should I be doing differently here? tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil 100MBit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 110:

...ce the T1 is limited by hardware and by its nature to 64kbps per channel the most I can pump out of it is up+down < 512kbps. If a number of workstations amount to more than this limit the connection starts to choke e.g. delivers very low performance even on simple http requests. Right now I have HTBs installed on both eth0 and eth1. The HTB with subclasses on eth0 governs outgoing traffic (smtp and http). The HTB on eth1 on the other hand covers all request from the internal clients (http, streaming audio etc). Everything works well except the fact that both shaping trees have no idea about eac...

...to any machine, whether comming from the DMZ to the internet, or from the LAN to the internet, should get at least 2KB/s low-latency traffic each, even if other machines or other connections are being made in the background. I am wondering whether my first qdisc should infact be an SFQ and then HTBs below it? All help will be gratefully received. Thank you, Gareth ----- Start long probably incorrect tcng code (I have left out the ingress code I had, because it didn''t work at all, and I didn''t understand any of it) #define INTERNET eth0 #define LAN eth1 #define DMZ eth2 #...

Hello, I''m using tc to limit the bandwidth of our wireless customers. I have a working script, but I''m not happy with it. I''m trying to write a more sophisticated script, but when I run it, it give me this error: RTNETLINK answers: File exists I have no idea what this error means or how to fix it. Here is a portion of the script (the whole script shapes several

Hi again, I keep posting about my problem with HTB -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016611.html With a bit of search I recently found the exact same problem I have in the 2004 archives with some graphs that explain it far better than I did -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014519.html and http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014568.html

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

Hi everybody! I''m using an edge bridge box with two ethernet cards to shape traffic in a WAN link. I''m running Debian 3.1 stable with kernel 2.6.8 and iproute from packages. I recompiled the kernel with the following built-in options: [*] 802.1d Ethernet Bridging [*] QoS and/or fair queueing <*> HTB packet scheduler <*> SFQ queue [*] QoS support

Hello, I run one of my PCs as my personal router, with iptables+tc to control traffic and be my firewall. In TC, I use a combination of htb, qdisc and sfq (as well as prio) to classify bandwidth. In my current setup, I have 10 classifications of my bandwidth. (Even I admit this is probably more than I need, but at this point I''m still learning, so I''ll just leave them be.)