Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the total parent rate for 768Kbps. But what happened is the traffic monitored at eth0 almost all the time eating all the bandwidth we have. # DOWNSTREAM 768Kbps /sbin/ip link set imq1 up /sbin/tc qdisc add dev imq1 root handle 2: htb default 0 /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2: classid 2:1 htb rate 768Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2:1 classid 2:10 htb rate 128kbit ceil 768kbit /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2:1 classid 2:20 htb rate 128kbit ceil 768kbit /sbin/tc filter add dev imq1 parent 2: protocol ip handle 10 fw classid 2:10 /sbin/tc filter add dev imq1 parent 2: protocol ip handle 20 fw classid 2:20 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.1.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 10 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.2.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 20 Please help me analyze whats wrong. Thank you. Regards, Rio Martin.
1. lines: /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.1.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 10 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.2.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 20 should be in this order: /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.1.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 10 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.2.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 20 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 3. performance fix /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2: classid 2:1 htb rate 768Kbit doesnt have CEIL defined? it has to have it defined so your modem wont queue packets, making your latency go to meet the sky :-) set it to 90-95% of the bandwidth your modem can do /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2: classid 2:1 htb rate 768Kbit ceil 1000kbit 4. performance fix put some leaf qdisc like SFQ. /sbin/tc qdisc add sfq parent id 2:20 handle 20 : sfq perturb 10 5. performance fix in the classes 2:10 and 2:20 you're using only 256kbit of RATE. change it so their sum is the rate of their parent. On 5/18/05, Rio Martin. <rio@martin.mu> wrote:> > Folks, > I'm so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. > Here is my setup: > > INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM > both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) > > Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? > eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. > > I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the total parent rate for > 768Kbps. But what happened is the traffic monitored at eth0 almost all the > time eating all the bandwidth we have. > > # DOWNSTREAM 768Kbps > /sbin/ip link set imq1 up > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev imq1 root handle 2: htb default 0 > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2: classid 2:1 htb rate 768Kbit > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2:1 classid 2:10 htb rate 128kbit ceil > 768kbit > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2:1 classid 2:20 htb rate 128kbit ceil > 768kbit > /sbin/tc filter add dev imq1 parent 2: protocol ip handle 10 fw classid > 2:10 > /sbin/tc filter add dev imq1 parent 2: protocol ip handle 20 fw classid > 2:20 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 > > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.1.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 10 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.2.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 20 > > Please help me analyze whats wrong. > Thank you. > > Regards, > Rio Martin. > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc >-- Miłego Dnia Krystian Antoni _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Rio Martin. wrote:> Folks, > I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. > Here is my setup: > > INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM > both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) > > Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? > eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. > > I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the total parent rate for > 768Kbps. But what happened is the traffic monitored at eth0 almost all the > time eating all the bandwidth we have. > > # DOWNSTREAM 768Kbps > /sbin/ip link set imq1 up > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev imq1 root handle 2: htb default 0 > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2: classid 2:1 htb rate 768Kbit > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2:1 classid 2:10 htb rate 128kbit ceil > 768kbit > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2:1 classid 2:20 htb rate 128kbit ceil > 768kbit > /sbin/tc filter add dev imq1 parent 2: protocol ip handle 10 fw classid 2:10 > /sbin/tc filter add dev imq1 parent 2: protocol ip handle 20 fw classid 2:20 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1You only need one -j IMQ here.> > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.1.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 10 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.2.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 20You will get away with the mark after -j imq - but it doesn''t look very elegant :-)> > Please help me analyze whats wrong.Assuming tc -s class or qdisc ls dev imq1 shows everything is getting there OK then I think the problem is that htbs quelength is far too long for your link. You are also shaping from the wrong end of the bottleneck so the queues only fill slowly. Add queues to your htb leaf classes so you can set the length, if you choose sfq use the limit option as the 128 packet default is too long. Andy.
I tried your way for the whole day. but still with the same result. Maybe i''ll try just like Andy Furmis said. set some limit to SFQ. Regards, Rio Martin. On Thursday 19 May 2005 06:07, Krystian Antoni wrote:> 1. > lines: > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.1.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 10 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.2.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 20 > should be in this order: > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.1.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 10 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 202.x.2.0/24 -j MARK > --set-mark 20 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 > /usr/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j IMQ --todev 1 > 3. performance fix > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2: classid 2:1 htb rate 768Kbit > doesnt have CEIL defined? it has to have it defined so your modem wont > queue packets, making your latency go to meet the sky :-) set it to 90-95% > of the bandwidth your modem can do > /sbin/tc class add dev imq1 parent 2: classid 2:1 htb rate 768Kbit ceil > 1000kbit > 4. performance fix > put some leaf qdisc like SFQ. > /sbin/tc qdisc add sfq parent id 2:20 handle 20 : sfq perturb 10 > 5. performance fix > in the classes 2:10 and 2:20 you''re using only 256kbit of RATE. change it > so their sum is the rate of their parent.
Dear folks, I am thinking about routing inside my router box. Is it posible ? INTERNET --> [eth0] ROUTER1 [eth1] --> [eth0] ROUTER2 [eth1] --> USERS I want to make it simple just like this: INTERNET --> [eth0] ROUTER [eth1] --> USERS Please give me some clues, thanks before .. Regards, Rio Martin.