search for: hoos

Hello, some of the patches had conflicts with LLVM head, so I updated them. If you experienced patch failure before then you can try it again. I compiled your code (1.c) with LLVM r308173 with the 5 patches applied, and it generated assembly like this. Now it contains store to c(%rip). It tries to store a(%rip) + b(%rip) to c(%rip). I wish this translation is now correct. ``` 73 .globl hoo

It seems MemorySSA.cpp is the only real code where we found the problem happening. Is it possible to change the source of MemorySSA.cpp to hide the problem and buy some time for now? Now we use an empty generic_def_path_iterator with Optional<ListIndex> N being initialized by None as the end of range. Can we initialize the Optional var with a special value instead of None?

Hi, let's say I have this A = matrix(c(1, 2, 4), nrow=1) colnames(A)=c("YOO1", "YOO2", "YOO3") # ie # YOO1 YOO2 YOO3 #[1,] 1 2 4 HELLO <- NULL HELLO$YOO1="BOO" HELLO$YOO2="BOO" HELLO$YOO3="HOO" and I want a matrix that will sum my categorization.. how can I do it efficiently without any loop? #ie BOO HOO

Hi, On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: >> >> It seems MemorySSA.cpp is the only real code where we found the >> problem happening. > > > This is doubtful, ¸FWIW :) > >> >> Is it possible to change the

Hi everyone, I''m looking for a shortcut to finding and updating or creating record depending on the results of the find. So, is there a shorter way to do it than this? @stuff = Stuff.find_by_foo_and_bar("yay","hooray") if @stuff: Stuff.update(@stuff.id, {:foo => "boo", :bar => "hoo"}) else Stuff.create({:foo => "boo",

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Sanjoy Das > <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Wei Mi

This is a bug found by internal compiler bootstrap, and possibly it is the root cause of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33652 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33626. Here is the testcase 1.c. The original code is at MemorySSA.cpp:586 for rL307764. ------------------------- 1.c --------------------------- long a, c, d, e, f, m, cnt, i_hasval; volatile long b; void goo(long); void

Part 2 of my Rails article on ONLamp.com just made the slashdot front page! The entry, itself, is here: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/04/1319242&tid=156 Curt

We've got the following test case: class A { public: int x; A(int x) : x(x) {} int hoo() {return 4;} virtual int foo() {return x;} virtual int goo() {return foo()+10;} virtual int operator+(A &a) { return x + a.x; } }; class B : public A { public: B(int x) : A(x) {} int hoo() {return 2;} virtual int foo() {return A::foo()*2;} }; int main() { A* a = new A(1);

On 07/18/2017 06:03 PM, David Majnemer via llvm-dev wrote: > I doubt it is possible for us to try and make any fix which is > predicated on eagerly treating undef in a particular way, refinement > will always cause these problems to come about... > > Given what I've seen in LLVM (and what I've learned from other > compilers), we probably have two choices: > 1.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Vitor Luis Menezes <vitor at utexas.edu> wrote: > We've got the following test case: > > > class A { > public: >   int x; >   A(int x) : x(x) {} >   int hoo() {return 4;} >   virtual int foo() {return x;} >   virtual int goo() {return foo()+10;} >   virtual int operator+(A &a) { >     return x + a.x; >   } > };

I finally got a working native windows build of wxRuby (using a static build of wxWindows so everything is in a single dll -- wxruby.so)! Two things contributed to my success: 1) building wxWindows with the vc++ makefiles (instead of the vc++ projects), and 2) very careful attention to compiler/linker flags specified in extconf.rb. Kevin, I had to modify app.cpp, depend, extconf.rb, and wx.h. I

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> > wrote: > > The issue blocks another optimization patch and Wei has spent huge > amount of > > effort isolating the the bootstrap failure to this same problem. I agree > >

I'm using a Snom 320 in a CAP position and the receptionist wants to do blind transfers. OK, no problem so far. Now she has asked me how to UN-transfer a call, as in, she transfers a call and wants to hook the call back before it connects (she wanted to tell the caller additional information for example) I don't think that this is possible as once my dialplan starts using Dial()

Hello all, I am very happy to announce that registration for my new course entitled "Ruby on Rails Development" at my college is now open. We are offering this course as part of our LAMP certificate which is designed for working professionals who want to upgrade their skills. I think that it is a sign of Rails'' growing maturity that I was able to propose this and work it

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:30:19AM -0700, Ray Klassen via samba wrote: > > and from the what the hell department. I did it. Comparing > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/lmshare/ns-lmshare-_session_info_1 > > > and > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/lmshare/ns-lmshare-_session_info_10 > > and > >

Hiya, I''ve recently been looking at removing the dependency in our CRM/CMS on MSIE XML Databinding so that it''ll run properly in Firefox.. The solution I''ve created uses the prototype.js lib so I thought I might share my efforts here if that''s ok? It''s still _very_ early days but there''s the beginnings of a writeup here:

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Vitor Luis Menezes <vitor at utexas.edu> wrote: > Hello all, > > Our compilers class has been using LLVM, and a partner and I decided to > implement devirtualization of virtual C++ calls in LLVM as a class project. > We quickly realized that existing debug metadata generated by Clang didn't > give us enough info to (precisely) implement

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Vitor Luis Menezes <vitor at utexas.edu> wrote: >> We've got the following test case: >> >> >> class A { >> public: >>   int x; >>   A(int x) : x(x) {} >>   int hoo() {return 4;} >>   virtual int foo() {return x;}

Whoo hoo! I just received my WIP300 from voipsupply. I have to let it charge before I can play with it. A few quick comments: - I started a Wiki page at voip-info to post issues, firmware news, etc. I really like the wealth of info on the GXP-2000 page, so I wanted to start something similar for this phone. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Linksys%20WIP300 - My kit