search for: heisenbug

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80 matches for "heisenbug".

Did you mean: heisenbugs
1997 Apr 01
0
R-alpha: R-testers: pmin heisenbug
I must admit to being baffled by this. When I type "R" I get R : Copyright 1997, Robert Gentleman and Ross Ihaka Version 0.50 Beta (April 1, 1997) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type "license()" for details. > gc() Garbage collection ... 150427 cons cells free (75%) 1823k
2015 Oct 09
1
[PATCH] inspect: Don't free uninitialized string.
libguestfs: trace: v2v: read_lines "/etc/os-release" [...] libguestfs: trace: v2v: read_lines = ["NAME=Fedora", "VERSION="20 (Heisenbug)"", "ID=fedora", "VERSION_ID=20", "PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 20 (Heisenbug)"", "ANSI_COLOR="0;34"", "CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:20"", "HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/"", "BUG...
2008 May 21
4
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing
...s.cpp is necessary, so it won't build without this patch either. I didn't have to apply patch 51323 to get things to build -- but the patch seems correct and it builds OK with it applied FYI I'm using Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition (not Express). m. PS. The proposed fix (by heisenbug) to the warnings from the operator new in User.h doesn't work at all.
2009 May 22
2
Scope problem?
I've just spent today trying to fix a Heisenbug... this function returns a linear interpolator function: interpOne <- function(xl,yl){ f = function(data){ t = (data-min(xl))/(max(xl)-min(xl)) return(min(yl)+t*(max(yl)-min(yl))) } return(f) } > k=interpOne(c(0,1),c(4,5)) > k(0.5) [1] 4.5 and this function uses the above...
2004 Aug 23
2
MIME structure intermittently lost
.... Intermittently messages with multiple parts show up as a single text part. I'm not sure if it's Mulberry or Dovecot. I just turned on IMAP logging and restarted Mulberry and a message with two text/plain parts that wasn't showing the 2nd part is now displaying it correctly. I hate heisenbugs!
2008 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave2
On Apr 17, 7:01 pm, Owen Anderson <resis... at mac.com> wrote: > Gabor, > > Have you updated llvm2cpp to generate calls to the appropriate new Yes. These are caught by my conversion scripts. > constructors? Also, could you check the code in the tutorials to make > sure it matches the new API? Good point, will do. Thanks, Gabor > > --Owen
2008 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave2
On Apr 18, 5:51 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 7:01 pm, Owen Anderson <resis... at mac.com> wrote: > > > Gabor, > > > Have you updated llvm2cpp to generate calls to the appropriate new > > Yes. These are caught by my conversion scripts. > > > constructors?...
2008 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing
On May 21, 11:21 pm, mor... at hue.no wrote: [snip] > > FYI I'm using Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition (not Express). > > m. > > PS. The proposed fix (by heisenbug) to the warnings from the operator new in User.h doesn't work at all. Hmmm, this is really unfortunate. http://www.glenmccl.com/tip_025.htm confirms the given recipe. By "doesn't work at all" you mean that the warnings still appear, or do you get errors? Thanks for helping to ge...
2008 May 21
1
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing
Errrrr, please make that void operator delete(void*, size_t) {} The mainline changed it in the meantime (size_t --> unsigned). Sorry for the confusion :-/ Cheers, Gabor On May 22, 12:39 am, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 21, 11:21 pm, mor... at hue.no wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > FYI I'm using Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition (not Express). > > > m. > > > PS. The proposed fix (by heisenbug) to the warnings from the opera...
2008 Apr 04
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
heisenbug wrote: > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > ... > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test >>> passes with this patch :) >>> >> I have never run llvm-test in the past. Is it just...
2008 Apr 08
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM Server Back Up
Looks like some clocks are wrong, as shown by the timestamp on <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-April/ 013731.html>. Cheers, Gabor On Apr 9, 6:28 am, John Criswell <crisw... at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > > The LLVM server is back online.  If you find something that isn't > working, please let me know. > > Thanks for your patience. >
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote: > heisenbug wrote: > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > > ... > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test > >>> passes with this patch :) > > >> I have never run llvm-test in the past. Is it jus...
2008 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave2
On Apr 16, 2008, at 2:50 AM, heisenbug wrote: > > And now here is my educated speculation: > There are 2 things that became slower > 1) Use::getUser() > 2) Use::get/set due to tagging. > > The former is seldom called: > > $ find lib -name "*.cpp" | xargs grep "getUser(" | wc -l > 41...
2008 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] Available code-generation parallelism
On Nov 6, 4:22 am, Jonathan Brandmeyer <jbrandme... at earthlink.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > > RAUW it in. Alternatively, submit to a privileged thread that performs > > > the RAUW. >...
2008 Apr 04
3
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > heisenbug wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > > > ... > > > >>> 3) Make sure that mak...
2008 Nov 06
4
[LLVMdev] Available code-generation parallelism
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > RAUW it in. Alternatively, submit to a privileged thread that performs > > the RAUW. > > The trick is to...
2007 Apr 06
1
pap2 - dtmf works when 'sip debug' is enabled
I am having an odd problem with a linksys pap2 ata and asterisk... Asterisk won't detect digits from it until I issue a 'sip debug'. As soon as I turn on sip debugging, everything works perfectly (classic heisenbug)! Asterisk is latest Debian 'etch' packaged 1.2.13. sip.conf looks like: [mc_ext01] type=friend secret=ext01 context=mc_ata_in host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833 nat=yes qualify=1000 canreinvite=yes disallow=all allow=g729 allow=alaw the 'dtmf tx method' on the pap2 is set to 'aut...
2008 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Server Back Up
FYI, the mailing lists are handled by separate UIUC servers and are not hosted by the llvm server. All web, svn, etc are on the llvm server. John - Can you find out why the mailing list archives have incorrect time stamps? -Tanya On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:59 PM, heisenbug wrote: > Looks like some clocks are wrong, as shown by the timestamp > on <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-April/ > 013731.html>. > > Cheers, > Gabor > > On Apr 9, 6:28 am, John Criswell <crisw... at uiuc.edu> wrote: >> Dear All, >>...
2008 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/tools/lto* rename heads up
I have experienced this with a svn 1.5 client but not with 1.4.6. Did anybody see this with a 1.4.6 (or older) client? Btw. what is the server version? Anyway this seems to be a bug in subversion. Cheers, Gabor PS: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=79361 On Jul 1, 5:27 am, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > Devang removed the old
2010 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Criteria for backing out patches
Hi all, looks like the WWDC has been a nice success, but it is over now and all devs are back to normal mode. I have written up a very subjective blog post here <http://heisenbug.blogspot.com/2010/06/my-grief-with-out-of-tree-code.html> in which I ask for clarifications to the development policy wrt. backing out of buildbot-proven patches because of (unintended) breakage in external projects. It mostly amounts to how devs can cooperate to advance the fundamental status...