search for: heisenbugs

I must admit to being baffled by this. When I type "R" I get R : Copyright 1997, Robert Gentleman and Ross Ihaka Version 0.50 Beta (April 1, 1997) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type "license()" for details. > gc() Garbage collection ... 150427 cons cells free (75%) 1823k

libguestfs: trace: v2v: read_lines "/etc/os-release" [...] libguestfs: trace: v2v: read_lines = ["NAME=Fedora", "VERSION="20 (Heisenbug)"", "ID=fedora", "VERSION_ID=20", "PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 20 (Heisenbug)"", "ANSI_COLOR="0;34"", "CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:20"",

>I just sent a reply to Razvan with 3 patches that I think should be merged >into the release branch. I want to keep it somewhat in sync with mainline. >Can you try applying those 3 patches and let me know if it builds for you >and what version of MSVC you have? It doesn't build. first problem is patch 51098 that adds lib\VMCore\Use.cpp and lib\Transforms\Utils\UnrollLoop.cpp

I've just spent today trying to fix a Heisenbug... this function returns a linear interpolator function: interpOne <- function(xl,yl){ f = function(data){ t = (data-min(xl))/(max(xl)-min(xl)) return(min(yl)+t*(max(yl)-min(yl))) } return(f) } > k=interpOne(c(0,1),c(4,5)) > k(0.5) [1] 4.5 and this function uses the above to return a function that returns a piece-wise

.... Intermittently messages with multiple parts show up as a single text part. I'm not sure if it's Mulberry or Dovecot. I just turned on IMAP logging and restarted Mulberry and a message with two text/plain parts that wasn't showing the 2nd part is now displaying it correctly. I hate heisenbugs!

On Apr 17, 7:01 pm, Owen Anderson <resis... at mac.com> wrote: > Gabor, > > Have you updated llvm2cpp to generate calls to the appropriate new Yes. These are caught by my conversion scripts. > constructors? Also, could you check the code in the tutorials to make > sure it matches the new API? Good point, will do. Thanks, Gabor > > --Owen

On Apr 18, 5:51 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 7:01 pm, Owen Anderson <resis... at mac.com> wrote: > > > Gabor, > > > Have you updated llvm2cpp to generate calls to the appropriate new > > Yes. These are caught by my conversion scripts. > > > constructors?  Also, could you check the code in the tutorials to make > >

On May 21, 11:21 pm, mor... at hue.no wrote: [snip] > > FYI I'm using Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition (not Express). > > m. > > PS. The proposed fix (by heisenbug) to the warnings from the operator new in User.h doesn't work at all. Hmmm, this is really unfortunate. http://www.glenmccl.com/tip_025.htm confirms the given recipe. By "doesn't work at

Errrrr, please make that void operator delete(void*, size_t) {} The mainline changed it in the meantime (size_t --> unsigned). Sorry for the confusion :-/ Cheers, Gabor On May 22, 12:39 am, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 21, 11:21 pm, mor... at hue.no wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > FYI I'm using Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition

heisenbug wrote: > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > ... > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test >>> passes with this patch :) >>> >> I have never run llvm-test in the past. Is it just checking it out and >> following a readme? >> > > > After

Looks like some clocks are wrong, as shown by the timestamp on <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-April/ 013731.html>. Cheers, Gabor On Apr 9, 6:28 am, John Criswell <crisw... at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > > The LLVM server is back online.  If you find something that isn't > working, please let me know. > > Thanks for your patience. >

On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote: > heisenbug wrote: > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > > ... > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test > >>> passes with this patch :) > > >> I have never run llvm-test in the past. Is it just checking it

On Apr 16, 2008, at 2:50 AM, heisenbug wrote: > > And now here is my educated speculation: > There are 2 things that became slower > 1) Use::getUser() > 2) Use::get/set due to tagging. > > The former is seldom called: > > $ find lib -name "*.cpp" | xargs grep "getUser(" | wc -l > 41 The majority of those aren't actually Use::getUser, but

On Nov 6, 4:22 am, Jonathan Brandmeyer <jbrandme... at earthlink.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > > RAUW it

On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > heisenbug wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > > > ... > > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test > > >>>

On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > RAUW it in. Alternatively, submit to a privileged thread that performs > > the RAUW. > > The trick is to

I am having an odd problem with a linksys pap2 ata and asterisk... Asterisk won't detect digits from it until I issue a 'sip debug'. As soon as I turn on sip debugging, everything works perfectly (classic heisenbug)! Asterisk is latest Debian 'etch' packaged 1.2.13. sip.conf looks like: [mc_ext01] type=friend secret=ext01 context=mc_ata_in host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833

FYI, the mailing lists are handled by separate UIUC servers and are not hosted by the llvm server. All web, svn, etc are on the llvm server. John - Can you find out why the mailing list archives have incorrect time stamps? -Tanya On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:59 PM, heisenbug wrote: > Looks like some clocks are wrong, as shown by the timestamp > on

I have experienced this with a svn 1.5 client but not with 1.4.6. Did anybody see this with a 1.4.6 (or older) client? Btw. what is the server version? Anyway this seems to be a bug in subversion. Cheers, Gabor PS: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=79361 On Jul 1, 5:27 am, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > Devang removed the old

Hi all, looks like the WWDC has been a nice success, but it is over now and all devs are back to normal mode. I have written up a very subjective blog post here <http://heisenbug.blogspot.com/2010/06/my-grief-with-out-of-tree-code.html> in which I ask for clarifications to the development policy wrt. backing out of buildbot-proven patches because of (unintended) breakage in external