search for: hahnfeld

...via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks for the info. I can reproduce the issue. But because of lack of cmake > knowledge, I don't know how to fix that now. If no one will take a look at > this, I'll investigate it. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Hahnfeld, Jonas > <Hahnfeld at itc.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: >> >> It builds fine but I cannot execute the resulting binary which aborts with >> the mentioned error. >> However I don't use LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS, I don't know if that changes the >> way libLLVM-4.0sv...

It builds fine but I cannot execute the resulting binary which aborts with the mentioned error.However I don't use LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS, I don't know if that changes the way libLLVM-4.0svn.so is linked... Cheers,Jonas Am Freitag, den 06.01.2017, 13:44 +0900 schrieb Rui Ueyama: > Hi Hahnfeld, > I just compiled with LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB enabled [1] and build lld with `ninja lld`. It built fine. What am I missing? > > [1] $ cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLVM_ENABLE_THREADS=On -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=true -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=true -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='clang;lld'...

...is then linked into bin/lld or bin/opt one gets errors because of "Option '...' registered more than once" as they are also present in the binaries themselves. Is it possible to keep the global variables for command line options out of libLLVM-4.0svn.so? Regards, Jonas -- Jonas Hahnfeld, MATSE-Auszubildender IT Center Group: High Performance Computing Division: Computational Science and Engineering RWTH Aachen University Seffenter Weg 23 D 52074 Aachen (Germany) Hahnfeld at itc.rwth-aachen.de www.itc.rwth-aachen.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment...

...non-temporal hints when different array elements are only used once per loop iteration We probably need to analyze the different load and stores per loop iteration for this... Any thoughts or any ongoing work that I'm missing? Thanks, Jonas [1] https://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/ -- Jonas Hahnfeld, MATSE-Auszubildender IT Center Group: High Performance Computing Division: Computational Science and Engineering RWTH Aachen University Seffenter Weg 23 D 52074 Aachen (Germany) Hahnfeld at itc.rwth-aachen.de www.itc.rwth-aachen.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment...

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Hahnfeld, Jonas <Hahnfeld at itc.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > as already said multiple times for the past releases: The tarballs will be > uploaded once they are finished. The tagged version currently gets tested > which is done with an export from SVN AFAIK. > > Please...

...s patterns is the programmer. Unless you can be certain the output of a function or loop is literally bigger than the entire cache and won’t be used again for a long time, forcibly evicting it from cache tends to be a very costly mistake. > > —escha > >> On May 3, 2016, at 3:40 AM, Hahnfeld, Jonas via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I've been wondering why Clang doesn't generate non-temporal stores when >> compiling the STREAM benchmark [1] and therefore doesn't yield optimal >> results. >&g...

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: > On 2018-08-27 09:44, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Yeah, I see. >> You have an unusual development process seen from my POV. > > > GNOME does the same, to pick one example: > https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointTwentynine > Tarballs a...

Please have a look at the dedicated mailing list: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/ Please wait for the official release to happen, you will then find tarballs on llvm.org. They will also contain correct version strings, though I haven't yet tried building from the SVN branches directly. Maybe you need to use the SVN tags, $ clang --version currently gives me "clang

...aries for... * macOS * FreeBSD10 AMD64 * Windows (32-bit) * Windows (64-bit) So giving an OK on different platforms than above listen ones is done via email? I mean without providing prebuilt binaries? - Sedat - [1] http://prereleases.llvm.org/7.0.0/#rc1 On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: > The answer is the same as two years ago: The tarballs are made available > once ready. The release manager will usually send another email saying so, > the last one said "[7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged" (not "available"). > &...

...es/3.8.1/. Jack On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There is no compiler-rt v3.8.1 source tarball available on > <http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.1/>. > > - Sedat - > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Hahnfeld, Jonas > <Hahnfeld at itc.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: >> Please have a look at the dedicated mailing list: >> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/ >> >> Please wait for the official release to happen, you will then find tarballs on >> llvm.org. They...

Curious. I removed -fno-experimental-isel and all of the tests *except* control_tool.c passed. I would have expected all of them to pass if blockaddress works. I'll try to look at some asm and see what's going on. -David Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> writes: > Hi David, > > I was the one who originally added the flag to fix failures related to > GlobalISel. This was because first versions of GlobalISel didn't know > how to select 'blockaddress', but this should have been fixed (see > ht...

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: >> >> Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was ju...

...ra/docs/ReleaseNotes.html https://llvm.org/releases/7.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Thanks to everyone who helped with filing, fixing, and code reviewing for the release-blocking bugs! Special thanks to the release testers and packagers: Bero Rosenkränzer, Brian Cain, Dimitry Andric, Jonas Hahnfeld, Lei Huang Michał Górny, Sylvestre Ledru, Takumi Nakamura, and Vedant Kumar. For questions or comments about the release, please contact the community on the mailing lists. Onwards to LLVM 8! Cheers, Hans

...ra/docs/ReleaseNotes.html https://llvm.org/releases/7.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Thanks to everyone who helped with filing, fixing, and code reviewing for the release-blocking bugs! Special thanks to the release testers and packagers: Bero Rosenkränzer, Brian Cain, Dimitry Andric, Jonas Hahnfeld, Lei Huang Michał Górny, Sylvestre Ledru, Takumi Nakamura, and Vedant Kumar. For questions or comments about the release, please contact the community on the mailing lists. Onwards to LLVM 8! Cheers, Hans

On 3 December 2016 at 17:23, Hahnfeld, Jonas via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think you got that wrong: Tom announced the tagging, not the availability of > the release candidate. I think the confusing thing here is that the email was sent to llvm-dev and cfe-dev inviting people to test it. Maybe we sh...

Hi Tom, [1] does not list any 3.9.1rc2 pre-release tarballs, can you please upload? Thanks in advance. Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://www.llvm.org/pre-releases/

On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:11, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >> On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >>>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >>>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>> Start your engi...

...ere is a lot missing and what is there is partially outdated. I'd add all features and if they are worked on, description of support, as well as the version they are landed in. What do you think? Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ From: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de<mailto:hahnjo at hahnjo.de>> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 2:20:21 AM To: Doerfert, Johannes Cc: llvm-dev; kli at ca.ibm.com<mailto:kli at ca.ibm.com>; Narayanaswamy, Ravi Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Webpage to track implementation status of OpenMP features Hi Joh...

On 19 August 2016 at 13:15, Hahnfeld, Jonas <Hahnfeld at itc.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > IMO this looks good overall, I think the questions are balanced and don't > encourage any direction themselves. > One minor point while reading (as a non-native speaker): "production product" > sounds weird :D It does...

On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: > > Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. >>...