search for: gypsi

If you have a working proxyARP setup, will you please post it? I''ve tried to insert a Linux box between the DSL connection and the switch, but I''m getting nowhere. Everything works correctly when all the servers in this network use the switch to get to the DSL. Any box directly connected to the DSL also works correctly. http://www.sjdjweis.com/linux/proxyarp/ makes it sound

In 2.4 kernels, there was a [bp]fifo that could be implemented with ''tc add'', but in 2.6 kernels, I find no way to create either of these fifos. I am able to increase txqueuelen. What I desire is a larger number of backlogged packetes before drops occur. How can the output buffer size be increased for HTB? -- gypsy

hello, i have a 5500 iPaq with familiar 0.8.2 on it and i don''t know how to install a traffic shaper tool on it. I installed iproute2 package i found on familiar site and for that i have the tc and ip commands, but when trying to add a qdisc, as a dummy example, i get the next answer: > tc qdisc add dev wlan0 root cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 100 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

Stephen, This REALLY needs to be fixed in the code; tc should reject as a syntax error any "add filter" command that does not include a "prio" parameter. It also needs to be documented. === From LARTC mailing list === > Dear list, > After much code crunching and beating my head against the wall > (literally), I discovered the faulty code. Thanks mostly to

hi i ve seen one of your replies here and i saw that you receomend 2 modifications in the kernel files in order to improve htb. first in pkt_sched.h, changing PSCHED_JIFFIES to PSCHED_CPU. and then, sch_htb.c, changing HYSTERESIS from 1 to 0. is it that simple? i mean i just change these here variables and i get better results? i ve done a search and found the first file in 3 locations. where

Hi All, I cross compiled and run tc in arm platform. When I tried executing it I got this error. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 mpu 64 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Is there something I''m missing here... Thanks. Grace _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi all. I experienced a strange behaviour in the "arp" command when I use the "pub" (publishing) flag. This is the scenario (I know it''s an unusual one, but it''s just for a test): __________ | | | host C | | | |__________| | __________|________________________________

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

Hi all, i need advice how can i limit ip_conntrack per IP. clients of network that i support often uses torrent , DC++ , eMule clients and i have lost packages because they open too many ports. i have traffic control limits but this obviously isn''t enough Any advance how to prevent server from this kind problems will be welcome. Best regards Emil

Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add

Hi I have been playing with tc. I''m using htb and sfq. I tried to setup shaping of every ip address within a /20. I found that there must be an upper limit of about 2096 on the number of rules (classes, qdiscs or filters). I was testing a /20 which gives 4096 classes, qdiscs and filters. I''m using hashkey to optimize processing of frames. When executing the script below - it

Hi all, If I am going to recompile my Kernel features needed to be enable for TC use? I using Fedora Core 2 64 bit with kernel version 2.6.10-1.771, with this version do I need to recompile the kernel or everything is ready? How Wwould I know if my existing kernel already supports tc? Thank you very much and best begards, Wennie

On 5/27/05, gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, I know what it means. > > Where did you get your esfq patch from? I downloded it from http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/<http://www.ssi.bg/%7Ealex/esfq/> What kernel version? If your kernel is 2.6 then get this patch: > http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/ <http://kem.p.lodz.pl/%7Epeter/qnet/> > >

how can i get rid of that ?? i do del roots before scripting. -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl | *Serwery,administracja,webapps - www.ProAdmin.com.pl | *Fingerprint:43E21CC46DAFD2F754E91547D59B39F56AAA4B5F

HTB: class htb 1:40 parent 1:1 leaf 40: prio 3 rate 358Kbit ceil 529Kbit \ burst 6Kb cburst 2260b Sent 145871726 bytes 97293 pkts (dropped 69, overlimits 0) rate 56741bit 37pps backlog 23p lended: 77429 borrowed: 19841 giants: 0 I would like to increase "backlog" because I think that would decrease "dropped". 23 packets of 1500 bytes each is only 34,500 bytes. IMO, there

I am attempting to implement IMQ on a 2.4.31 version kernel with iptables 1.3.3. I am following the example at http://www.linuximq.net/usage.html. When I enter the line iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j IMQ --todev1 (eth1 is the external interface), the computer slows to a crawl. OK, the CPU is only an AMD K6 233 which is not the world''s greatest CPU, but egress shaping is

I''ve gotten wondershaper to work in my linux box, which is part of a 3 computer network that shares the same dsl connection. The linuxbox handles most bulk down and uploading, and the other 2 are mainly for surfing and such. What I need from wiondershaper is that it should perform it''s tasks with all of the traffic to the dsl modem, but do nothing with the internal traffic

Hi Couple months ago I started to have a strange problem with HTB. My setup is Fedora Core 2 + Pentium 2 233 + 128 MB of ram and its serving as a router. For some time since going to kernel 2.6 my HTB QoS Stalls for couple seconds, every couple minutes. If the connection load is bigger the stalling is more frequent and takes longer. I isolated the problem to be with HTB (CBQ works fine). The

Although this SmartLink comes with a Linux program to monitor it, I'd rather use nut if possible. The biggest reason for preferring nut is that the supplied software forces one to set the On Battery time rather than allowing the battery to go critical and then sending a shutdown. Guessing how long the battery will last is problematical, especially as the battery ages. The other big reason

does anyone know a way to shape outgoing/upload traffic per ip? I have a network and i want to limit the upload with 100kbit per user. Ex: 192.168.1.20 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP 192.168.1.21 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP and so on....... Ive tried CBQ and HTB, but couldnt get is right. the only thing that I did in upload bases was: "tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate