Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.
chino wrote:> > Hi all, > I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few > days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to > know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet > connections. > > Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? > > Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. > Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.What bad English? Wondershaper does not work all that well because the sums of the rates and ceilings exceeds the root rate. You would do better to look at routehat (Which I think I spelled wrong), which uses WRR (Weighted Round Robin). Wondershaper is an excellent learning tool. By shaping OUTGOING, you can improve incoming, but Wondershaper drops the incoming in excess of the given rate so it is self defeating for improving download speed. If I remember right, it also incorrectly handles ACK packets. Read these: http://digriz.org.uk/ http://mrtg.saintjoe.edu/mrtg/ratelimit/pacemaker/ http://www.freenet.org.nz/python/pyshaper/ http://www.shurdix.org/ You can also have a look at: http://yesican.chsoft.biz/lartc -- gypsy
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:20:00 -0700 gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com> wrote:>Wondershaper does not work all that well because the sums of the rates and >ceilings exceeds the root rate. You would do better to look at routehat >(Which I think I spelled wrong),No you didn''t but it''s being renamed to Shurdix :-).>which uses WRR (Weighted Round Robin).In this specific case I am afraid WRR as implemented on http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/wrr.html won''t help. It divides traffic by the IP, but it looks like the original poster needs to divide it among users on a local machine. Yours sincerely, Peter
El Lunes, 11 de Julio de 2005 18:55, Peter Surda escribió:> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:20:00 -0700 gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com> wrote: > >Wondershaper does not work all that well because the sums of the rates and > >ceilings exceeds the root rate. You would do better to look at routehat > >(Which I think I spelled wrong), > > No you didn''t but it''s being renamed to Shurdix :-). > > >which uses WRR (Weighted Round Robin). > > In this specific case I am afraid WRR as implemented on > http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/wrr.html won''t help. It divides traffic by > the IP, but it looks like the original poster needs to divide it among > users on a local machine. > > Yours sincerely, > PeterWhats exactly Shurdix?