On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07:06:45 -0700
gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com> wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> This REALLY needs to be fixed in the code; tc should reject as a syntax
> error any "add filter" command that does not include a
"prio"
> parameter. It also needs to be documented.
>
> === From LARTC mailing list ==> > Dear list,
> > After much code crunching and beating my head against the wall
> > (literally), I discovered the faulty code. Thanks mostly to gypsy who
> > played a huge role in helping me discover the problem. My tc filter
line
> > had an error in it which completely baffles me because it worked up
> > until 2045 lines were entered.
> >
> > Old command:
> > tc filter add dev $dev protocol ip parent 12: u32 ht 2:$table1: ht
> > 3:$table2: match ip dst $ip/32 flowid 12:$classid
> >
> > New command:
> > tc filter add dev $dev protocol ip parent 12: prio 5 u32 ht 2:$table1:
> > ht 3:$table2: match ip dst $ip/32 flowid 12:$classid
> >
> > Who would have thought that a prio would cause that much trouble?
>
> Thanks,
> gypsy
I''ll get to it but not right away. If you want something fixed sooner
submit your patch.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/