search for: glxinfos

Dear Centos Users We are running centos on our HPC. Indeed, we have a problem with running some software using X11 server such as pymol. For your information, we are using cygwin to access to the hpc (using ssh -X -Y username at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) When we are testing glxinfo on my desktop, it gives us the following error: [username at hpc ~]# glxinfo name of display: localhost:10.0 X Error of

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71172 Priority: medium Bug ID: 71172 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Segfault when running glxinfo. NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL] Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: simon at mungewell.org Hardware:

Hi, Just to say that this report may well seem a little sparse, but I really don't know what exactly to look for so if anybody needs extra information just shout and I will get it for you ASAP. When I check the X.org log file, it says direct rendering: enabled on my graphics device (it attaches its i810 driver to the kernel's i915 DRM device). This would appear to me to suggest that

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11038 Summary: nouveau and NV17: glxinfo, glxgears and other gl-apps crash Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70212 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70212 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: glxinfo triggers assert in cso_release_all after 3f0627c2ad6 Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: awatry at gmail.com

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 Priority: medium Bug ID: 69488 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: GF108 (NVC1) GPU lockup QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: vekinn at gmail.com Hardware: Other

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28570 Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Component|Server/general

I'm not reporting a bug (I know it's not the right place to do that anyway), but a little help would be appreciated. Once again I run into the famous "compiz: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing" error. The problem is I can't figure out what's wrong. I use fedora core 6 on an athlon XP with an ati RV250 and the radeon open-source drivers running compiz reports: $

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99968 Bug ID: 99968 Summary: [NV4C] System crashes reliably with glxinfo Product: Mesa Version: 12.0 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:

Hi! I have managed to get games like Team Fortress 2 and Mirror's Edge to finally run. But only with really bad performance. If I run glxinfo | grep direct in the terminal, I get: Code: direct rendering: No (LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set) However, if I run sudo glxinfo | grep direct, it outputs this: Code: direct rendering: Yes I'm not sure if that is relevant, but it seems a bit odd.

I have been running Debian Testing for at least 6 months now and up until about a month ago, Warcraft III ran fine. Now it keeps giving me an error about msvcr80.dll. I have that dll in the warcraft directory. Also, I have compiz start up at logon, but even if I replace it with kwin, the same error still comes up so it's not compiz. I checked glxinfo and the correct driver is installed

Hi, I saw a thread on this subject from about a month ago and the solution presented there doesn't quite work for me so I thought I'd try to revive it: I am running Fedora Core 6. I had wine installed primarily in order to run a small dos app and it worked beautifully. Yesterday, after a reboot, FC offered to update my packages, including wine, and I agreed. Now, pretty much any wine

...o reliably reproduce PFIFO CACHE_ERRORS, but I don't see why. How to reproduce them: 1) Run a couple of glxinfo loops - 3 is usually enough. while [ true ]; do nvgl glxinfo >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; done 2) Run glxgears. 3) If you can't see it now, resize glxgears window or add more glxinfos. Note: you need at least 2 CPUs. Usually the error looks like this (with a bit improved logging): nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:02:00.0] CACHE_ERROR - ch 6 [glxgears[15559]] subc 0 mthd 0x0060 data 0x8000000f c1p0 0x20000010 HASH_FAILED (unknown bits 0x20000000) c1_hash 0x00000436 What I found so far:...

Hello, I'm using Fedora 7 and I thought I should try nouveau. I couldn't get direct rendering to work. I found out that the Mesa package that ships with Fedora 7 doesn't include a DRI interface for the nouveau module. So I fetched the latest Mesa source from git, compiled with 'mke DRI_DIRS=nouveau linux-dri-x86' and copied the produced ./lib/nouveau_dri.so in the

hi all i'm running debian sid..and i tried to compile the las version of compiz because the old version of compiz did not supported compiz settings.. btw here is what i did: 1) followed the official compiling guide => http://go-compiz.org/index.php?title=Compiling 2) try to run by launching compiz...but the only results was to not view the windows' borders.. so i searched in the

Hello guys, i've decided to test nouveau driver and installed it recently from official repos. My videocard is GeForce 4 with additional S-video and Composite outputs, 64 MB of memory. I installed xubuntu, and tried to use nouveau driver instead of official nvidia's. After switching driver, the boot splash xubuntu logo turned into poor coloured low-resolutioned one, but X loaded normally.

Hi, I tried applying http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/drm-stable-20030411.diff to stable from today (using device radeondrm and options DRM_LINUX). Kernel reports drm seems to be there: drm0: <ATI Radeon QY RV100 VE> port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xed000000-0xed00ffff,0xe$ info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.8.0 20020828 on minor 0 Now, when I try to start XFree86 everything looks fine

Hi, I'm running bricscad V9 (CAD application) under wine-1.1.28. All installation and functionality is OK, but performance is really poor with respect to the same app. on the same machine under Windows XP. So I think it's wine's fault. I checked for performance issues on the www, but I found no help. I also noticed the claim that NO performance fall-off should be expected and this is

Hello guys... I compiled inside of "mock" libdrm 2.67 mesa 11.2.1 ati 7.6.1 mockbuild says: libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK installed packaged: xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos @local-drivers OK libdrm.x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98629 Bug ID: 98629 Summary: OpenGL applications warns "MESA-LOADER: failed to retrieve device information" Product: Mesa Version: 13.0 Hardware: Other OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium