CentOS - Apr 2016 - libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??

Hello guys...

I compiled inside of "mock"

libdrm 2.67
mesa 11.2.1
ati 7.6.1

mockbuild says:

libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK

mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK

installed packaged:

xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64              7.6.1-1.el7.centos
@local-drivers OK

libdrm.x86_64
2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK

glxinfo says:

OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
3.6.2)
OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
3.00

DRM 2.43.0 ??

Wired...

forgotten to say,

on my first centos installation i dig it up as 
yum-builddep and rpmbuild and it did work:

	libdrm
	mesa
	ati


Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Andreas
Benzler:
> Hello guys...
> 
> I compiled inside of "mock"
> 
> libdrm 2.67
> mesa 11.2.1
> ati 7.6.1
> 
> mockbuild says:
> 
> libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK
> 
> mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK
> 
> installed packaged:
> 
> xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64              7.6.1-1.el7.centos
> @local-drivers OK
> 
> libdrm.x86_64
> 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
> 
> glxinfo says:
> 
> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
> 3.6.2)
> OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
> OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
> OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
> 3.00
> 
> DRM 2.43.0 ??
> 
> Wired...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

after downgrade all mesa libdrm ati:
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER
OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 10.6.5
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 10.6.5
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 10.6.5
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
3.00

libdrm info gone...? Output mistake? harmless?

Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 19:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas
Benzler:
> forgotten to say,
> 
> on my first centos installation i dig it up as 
> yum-builddep and rpmbuild and it did work:
> 
> 	libdrm
> 	mesa
> 	ati
> 
> 
> Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler:
> > Hello guys...
> > 
> > I compiled inside of "mock"
> > 
> > libdrm 2.67
> > mesa 11.2.1
> > ati 7.6.1
> > 
> > mockbuild says:
> > 
> > libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers -
OK
> > 
> > mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK
> > 
> > installed packaged:
> > 
> > xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64              7.6.1-1.el7.centos
> > @local-drivers OK
> > 
> > libdrm.x86_64
> > 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
> > 
> > glxinfo says:
> > 
> > OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
> > 3.6.2)
> > OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
> > OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
> > OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> > OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
> > OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> > OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
> > 3.00
> > 
> > DRM 2.43.0 ??
> > 
> > Wired...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Benzler
wrote:
> Hello guys...
> 
> I compiled inside of "mock"
> 
> libdrm 2.67
> mesa 11.2.1
> ati 7.6.1
> 
> mockbuild says:
> 
> libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK
> 
> mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK
> 
> installed packaged:
> 
> xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64              7.6.1-1.el7.centos
> @local-drivers OK
> 
> libdrm.x86_64
> 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
> 
> glxinfo says:
> 
> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
> 3.6.2)
> OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
> OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
> OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
> 3.00
> 
> DRM 2.43.0 ??
> 
> Wired...
> 
These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of
these SRPMs?

Regards

Phil

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160416/a715a651/attachment-0001.sig>

Hello Phil,

the idea behind of all my private work to get centos 7 work for more as an
server only system:

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/>

and it looks like a harmless output that can be ignored.

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/
<http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/>
X11 and ATI (stable)

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/
<http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/>
Mesa (11.1.2 stable)

kernel
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/
<http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/>
4.4.7 lts stable

the graphical desktop runs much better.

No one of my Desktop PC around works good with the default resources. Don?t
forget that centos 7 is from 2014 and
two of my machines are from 2010 and 2012.

nux-dextop gstreamer never works for me on Centos 7.2

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/
<http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/>

this setup run everything that i touch in multimedia with totem.

Sources and rpm not gpg -  private server. 

Baken with Centos and epel mock

Sincerely

Andy
> Am 16.04.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Phil Wyett <philwyett at
irregulars-engineering.com>:
> 
> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> Hello guys...
>> 
>> I compiled inside of "mock"
>> 
>> libdrm 2.67
>> mesa 11.2.1
>> ati 7.6.1
>> 
>> mockbuild says:
>> 
>> libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK
>> 
>> mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK
>> 
>> installed packaged:
>> 
>> xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64              7.6.1-1.el7.centos
>> @local-drivers OK
>> 
>> libdrm.x86_64
>> 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
>> 
>> glxinfo says:
>> 
>> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
>> 3.6.2)
>> OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
>> OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
>> OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
>> OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
>> OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
>> OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
>> 3.00
>> 
>> DRM 2.43.0 ??
>> 
>> Wired...
>> 
> 
> These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of
> these SRPMs?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil