search for: glacially

I was interested in using 'virsh vol-upload' and 'virsh vol-download', rather than mucking about directly with the filesystem. But while simply copying the image is relatively quick: # ls -l /var/lib/libvirt/images/centos-7-cloud.qcow2 -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 1004994560 Apr 15 2015 centos-7-cloud.qcow2 # time cp /var/lib/libvirt/images/centos-7-cloud.qcow2

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Jacques Van Damme <Jacques.VanDamme at synopsys.com> wrote: > I am writing a backend for an architecture that has only 16-bit word > addressing (No byte addresses ever.  All data are always 16-bit). > > How can I specify this in the backend? In short, you can't. Word-addressable memory is not currently supported in LLVM (or Clang, for that

...have a WINS server running (for what it's worth...). Could some kind soul enlighten me as to what might be the problem? It's no fun trying to work like this :-( Cheers, Gerald PS. Is there any mailing list archive that's searchable, or a mailing list archive mirror? The main site is glacially slow from here.

Hi All, I am writing a backend for an architecture that has only 16-bit word addressing (No byte addresses ever. All data are always 16-bit). How can I specify this in the backend? As an example, consider the following instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr [129 x i16]* @flags, i16 0, i16 %i.043 When I generate assembler code, this now results in %i.043 being multiplied by 2 in the address

Hi all, we activated puppet mail reports but we are receiving a lot of mails when yum fails to update the repos, like this one: (err): Failed to retrieve current state of resource: Could not get latest version: Execution of ''/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 list available munin-node'' returned 1: Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: kbs-CentOS-Extras failure:

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:13:52PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > ># ./exec.sh |grep ^real > >real 0m1.944s > >real 0m0.051s > >real 0m1.843s > >real 0m1.798s > >real 0m18.236s > >real 0m1.756s > >real 0m1.769s > >real 0m2.092s > >real 0m1.952s > >real 0m1.954s > >real 0m17.588s > >real

Em 2015-08-05 16:13, Rowland Penny escreveu: > On 05/08/15 19:55, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >> >> I'm using CentOS 6.5 in all computers, workstations and servers. Samba >> 4.2.3, compiled last night. >> >> I wrote a script that connect at some workstations and run 'time id >> teste', the result: >> >> # ./exec.sh |grep ^real

I know this topic has been discussed many times... but what the hell makes zpool resilvering so slow? I''m running OpenSolaris 2009.06. I have had a large number of problematic disks due to a bad production batch, leading me to resilver quite a few times, progressively replacing each disk as it dies (and now preemptively removing disks.) My complaint is that resilvering ends up

Hi guys, I've been using a Polycom IP 301 for a couple of weeks now and find that it's extremely slow for configuring. For instance, it takes several minutes to boot up, apply any changes via the web interface takes at least a minute, etc. Is this normal behaviour? Is there anything that can be done about it? Thanks, -- Nick e: nick.hoffman@altcall.com p: +61 7 5591 3588 f: +61 7 5591

Em 2015-08-05 13:38, Rowland Penny escreveu: > On 05/08/15 17:18, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >> Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: >>> On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>>> An example of how slow is... >>>> >>>> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste >>>> uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users)

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:14:44AM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I was interested in using 'virsh vol-upload' and 'virsh vol-download', > rather than mucking about directly with the filesystem. But while > simply copying the image is relatively quick: > > # ls -l /var/lib/libvirt/images/centos-7-cloud.qcow2 > -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 1004994560 Apr 15

I upgraded to pre3 a couple hours ago & right now I'm watching my 00:00 backup set absolutely _crawl_. Typically, backups would have been finished somewhere in the 00:10 to 00:30 range, depending how much data changed across 6 machines in the past day. As I write this, the 3rd of 6 machines is (hopefully) just finishing its backup with no more than the usual changes per machine. Whiskey

Hello all, Server: 486-33, 20MB RAM Client: K6-233, 48MB RAM Copying a file from a Client -> Server ~= 450 K/sec. Copying a file from Server -> Client ~= 60 K/sec. FTP is in the 400-500 K/sec range, too, as is NFS. The linux box has plenty of free RAM, and shows almost no activity. In fact, the smbd process associated with the copy shows < 2% CPU util (less than top!) It seems as if

I need some help from those folks I've seen on this list with the speed problems. I noticed while printing to a smb printer from my Linux box tonight (which I just managed to get running) that the speed is horribly slow. I did some tests - the results follow. Transfer from Win98 to Linux ---------------------------- smb: \> get 1mbyte.txt getting file 1mbyte.txt of size 1024702 as

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 12, 2014, at 21:04, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6): >> >>

Hey everyone, My company is beginning to look at using SSD drives in our CentOS based servers. Does C5 and C6 support TRIM and other "required" functions for the SSD to operate? Thanks, Andrew Reis Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist CompTIA Network+ Networking/Systems Analyst Webmaster DBMS Inc.

...handling firewalling with brctl > bridges (ingress packet - hypervisor - firewall VM - hypervisor - tunnel > VM - hypervisor - firewall VM - hypervisor - egress packet) maxes out at > about 15 Mbit on the APU device being used, 1) I guess this APU is something other than x86? 15Mbits is *glacially* slow, regardless of what's used for the connection. 2) have you tried the same setup with macvtap (since you can't get vlans working, maybe just try an apples-apples comparison of traffic with no vlans on both setups) and seen markedly better performance? 3) You should be able to get...

On 05/08/15 19:55, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: > Em 2015-08-05 13:38, Rowland Penny escreveu: >> On 05/08/15 17:18, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>> Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: >>>> On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>>>> An example of how slow is... >>>>> >>>>> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time

New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non existent. You go to the main Asterisk page (digium.org) and really just old install instructions for 1.2 are in the examples. Download links only give you asterisk itself and not dahdi or libpri which also are needed to run asterisk? It's very confusing to anyone who is new. Someone take notice! we need a link

Hi Laine, thanks for your answer, I really appreciate that. On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:34:30AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > > I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are > > ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP > > or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's