search for: glacial

...l /var/lib/libvirt/images/centos-7-cloud.qcow2 -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 1004994560 Apr 15 2015 centos-7-cloud.qcow2 # time cp /var/lib/libvirt/images/centos-7-cloud.qcow2 /tmp/myimage.qcow2 real 0m10.829s user 0m0.024s sys 0m1.668s Trying to do the same thing with `virsh vol-download` is glacial: # time virsh vol-download --pool default centos-7-cloud.qcow2 /tmp/myimage.qcow2 I killed it after 10 minutes: real 10m20.775s user 10m19.451s sys 0m1.887s After which is was about halfway through: # ls -l /tmp/myimage.qcow2 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 564920248 Mar 4 11:11 /tmp/myim...

...of the changes that I made to the 2.8 release for a backend that targets a 24-bit word-addressable DSP, but it is quite rough and it includes changes in which you probably aren't interested (support for non-power-of-2 integer sizes and some other bug fixes). FWIW, I'm working (albeit at a glacial pace) on improving support for word-addressable memory in Clang, with the plan of eventually working my way down to LLVM. But I expect it will be a while until it is ready for production use. -Ken

...have a WINS server running (for what it's worth...). Could some kind soul enlighten me as to what might be the problem? It's no fun trying to work like this :-( Cheers, Gerald PS. Is there any mailing list archive that's searchable, or a mailing list archive mirror? The main site is glacially slow from here.

Hi All, I am writing a backend for an architecture that has only 16-bit word addressing (No byte addresses ever. All data are always 16-bit). How can I specify this in the backend? As an example, consider the following instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr [129 x i16]* @flags, i16 0, i16 %i.043 When I generate assembler code, this now results in %i.043 being multiplied by 2 in the address

Hi all, we activated puppet mail reports but we are receiving a lot of mails when yum fails to update the repos, like this one: (err): Failed to retrieve current state of resource: Could not get latest version: Execution of ''/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 list available munin-node'' returned 1: Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: kbs-CentOS-Extras failure:

...l 0m1.954s > >real 0m17.588s > >real 0m4.841s > >real 1m48.618s > >real 1m38.985s > >real 2m1.186s > >real 1m17.514s > >real 1m43.024s > >real 1m27.757s > >real 1m29.072s > > > > That is not slow, it is glacial :-) > > >From a certain moment, all workstation have increased response > >time. At this moment, you believe in a problem on workstation > >configuration? > > > > There is something definitely wrong, but what ? I've seen "id <username>" enumer...

...l 0m1.954s >> real 0m17.588s >> real 0m4.841s >> real 1m48.618s >> real 1m38.985s >> real 2m1.186s >> real 1m17.514s >> real 1m43.024s >> real 1m27.757s >> real 1m29.072s >> > > That is not slow, it is glacial :-) > >> From a certain moment, all workstation have increased response time. >> At this moment, you believe in a problem on workstation configuration? >> > > There is something definitely wrong, but what ? > >> I set log level = 9 in smb.conf and restart wi...

I know this topic has been discussed many times... but what the hell makes zpool resilvering so slow? I''m running OpenSolaris 2009.06. I have had a large number of problematic disks due to a bad production batch, leading me to resilver quite a few times, progressively replacing each disk as it dies (and now preemptively removing disks.) My complaint is that resilvering ends up

Hi guys, I've been using a Polycom IP 301 for a couple of weeks now and find that it's extremely slow for configuring. For instance, it takes several minutes to boot up, apply any changes via the web interface takes at least a minute, etc. Is this normal behaviour? Is there anything that can be done about it? Thanks, -- Nick e: nick.hoffman@altcall.com p: +61 7 5591 3588 f: +61 7 5591

Em 2015-08-05 13:38, Rowland Penny escreveu: > On 05/08/15 17:18, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >> Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: >>> On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>>> An example of how slow is... >>>> >>>> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste >>>> uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users)

...cloud.qcow2 > -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 1004994560 Apr 15 2015 centos-7-cloud.qcow2 > # time cp /var/lib/libvirt/images/centos-7-cloud.qcow2 /tmp/myimage.qcow2 > real 0m10.829s > user 0m0.024s > sys 0m1.668s > > Trying to do the same thing with `virsh vol-download` is glacial: > > # time virsh vol-download --pool default centos-7-cloud.qcow2 /tmp/myimage.qcow2 > > I killed it after 10 minutes: > > real 10m20.775s > user 10m19.451s > sys 0m1.887s > > After which is was about halfway through: > > # ls -l /tmp/myimage.qcow...

...: The pulling machine (hosts the backups) is load 0.00 & 0% cpu while the machine being pulled from is load 1.00 & cpu's pegged at 100% (rsync, to be pedantic). I also noticed on the 2nd & 3rd machines that /var/lib/slocate/slocate.db is one of many files transferring at an absolute glacial pace (others are various /var/log/* logs - plain flat files). All was working well previously. My last pull from cvs was Wed Oct 24 11:24:33 UTC 2007. Erik -- "Failure is not an option. (It comes bundled with Windows.)" "If at first you don't succeed, redefine success."

...as is NFS. The linux box has plenty of free RAM, and shows almost no activity. In fact, the smbd process associated with the copy shows < 2% CPU util (less than top!) It seems as if the server is just ... lazy. I've tried the SO_SNDBUF, SO_RCVBUF fixes, also max xmit, and it still pretty glacial. Can anyone get Win95 clients to read from Samba at a decent xfer rate? Thanks in advance, Ed Schernau

I need some help from those folks I've seen on this list with the speed problems. I noticed while printing to a smb printer from my Linux box tonight (which I just managed to get running) that the speed is horribly slow. I did some tests - the results follow. Transfer from Win98 to Linux ---------------------------- smb: \> get 1mbyte.txt getting file 1mbyte.txt of size 1024702 as

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 12, 2014, at 21:04, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6): >> >>

Hey everyone, My company is beginning to look at using SSD drives in our CentOS based servers. Does C5 and C6 support TRIM and other "required" functions for the SSD to operate? Thanks, Andrew Reis Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist CompTIA Network+ Networking/Systems Analyst Webmaster DBMS Inc.

...handling firewalling with brctl > bridges (ingress packet - hypervisor - firewall VM - hypervisor - tunnel > VM - hypervisor - firewall VM - hypervisor - egress packet) maxes out at > about 15 Mbit on the APU device being used, 1) I guess this APU is something other than x86? 15Mbits is *glacially* slow, regardless of what's used for the connection. 2) have you tried the same setup with macvtap (since you can't get vlans working, maybe just try an apples-apples comparison of traffic with no vlans on both setups) and seen markedly better performance? 3) You should be able to ge...

...gt; real 0m2.092s > real 0m1.952s > real 0m1.954s > real 0m17.588s > real 0m4.841s > real 1m48.618s > real 1m38.985s > real 2m1.186s > real 1m17.514s > real 1m43.024s > real 1m27.757s > real 1m29.072s > That is not slow, it is glacial :-) > From a certain moment, all workstation have increased response time. > At this moment, you believe in a problem on workstation configuration? > There is something definitely wrong, but what ? > I set log level = 9 in smb.conf and restart winbind. > A great time gap occurred...

New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non existent. You go to the main Asterisk page (digium.org) and really just old install instructions for 1.2 are in the examples. Download links only give you asterisk itself and not dahdi or libpri which also are needed to run asterisk? It's very confusing to anyone who is new. Someone take notice! we need a link

Hi Laine, thanks for your answer, I really appreciate that. On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:34:30AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > > I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are > > ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP > > or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's