search for: fp1

...f vector in a dataset to create a new dataframe that contains only these. These observations are not numerical, so I can't use the subset() function (at least this is the response I get from R). Suppose the dataframe looks like this:   ParticipID    ERP   Electrode 1         s1  0.0370       FP1 2         s2 35.0654       FP2 3         s3 -3.3852        F4 4         s4  2.6119        P3 5         s5  0.1224        P4 6         s6 -5.3153        O1 I want to create a subset of the dataframe with only the FP1, FP2, F4 levels of Electrode, how do I do? (actually the levels I have to filter...

Hi, In XenServer5.6 FP1 beta, I have switched default bridge to open vswitch, I wonder how to use "xe tunnel-create" to create a GRE tunnel. my commands: xe tunnel-create pif-uuid=eth0_uuid network-uuid=network_created_by_xe_network_create then I got an uuid which is "access-PIF" of output from &q...

...e' and so snapshots are inefficient. If you update only modified blocks, snapshots on COW filesystem takes far less space. I tested with an ugly program I wrote that does that, and it works well. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { FILE *fp1; FILE *fp2; char *oldfile = argv[1]; char *newfile = argv[2]; fp1 = fopen(oldfile, "rb+"); if(fp1 == NULL) { perror("failed to open 1"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } fp2 = fopen(newfile, "rb"); if(fp2 == NULL) { perr...

I''m needing to put a network card on a test server XCP 1.0. I''m seeing the citrix hcl (http://hcl.xensource.com) and I''m a doubt. I base that on which version to look for a compatible card? If the kernel is the same as in 5.6.0 FP1, but if the version of XCP uses the hypervisor 3.4.2 neither appears on the list. ps: I had a RTL-8169 but stopped working with update 0.5 for 1.0. It seems that this happened also with those who have upgraded from 5.6.0 to 5.6.0 FP1 . I tried to modify /etc/modprobe.conf inserting "options...

Hi, I am using XenServer5.6 FP1 GA release with openvswitch as network backend. When I create VM through xapi, "apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: I/O error" happens very frequently. At meanwhile my xencenter lost connection to hosts. Another thing is when I tried to kill VMs from xencenter, it complains "Int...

...Count entries for sort */ for (n = 0; d[n] != NULL; n++) --- 555,587 ---- /* sftp ls.1 replacement for directories */ static int ! do_ls_dir(struct sftp_conn *conn, char *path, char *strip_path, int lflag, ! char *localpath) { int n; SFTP_DIRENT **d; + FILE *fp = NULL; + FILE *fp1 = NULL; + + if (localpath) { + fp = fopen(localpath, "w"); + if (!fp) + { + error("Can't write to file %s", localpath); + return -1; + } + } + + if (fp) + fp1 = fp; + else + fp1 = stdout; if ((n = do_readdir(conn, path, &d)) != 0) + { + if (f...

Hi, I am using Xen Center5.6 FP1 since last 8 months and it was working fine since last few weeks, when i observed that suddenly all new Xen VMs started showing me sda or hda disks as xvhd. This is observed when i try to create any new Xen VM on my XenCenter5.6FP1. All my earlier Xen VMs are still showing hda or sda but when i try...

Hi, I am using Xen Center5.6 FP1 since last 8 months and it was working fine since last few weeks, when i observed that suddenly all new Xen VMs started showing me sda or hda disks as xvhd. This is observed when i try to create any new Xen VM on my XenCenter5.6FP1. All my earlier Xen VMs are still showing hda or sda but when i try...

Hi Chandler, this seems sound to me. For example, consider running function passes. Currently it works like this: if you schedule two function passes in succession, FP1 and FP2, then for each function F, FP1 is run on F then FP2 is run on F. In your new scheme, if you schedule FP1 followed by FP2, then each will act as a module pass and thus: for each function F, FP1 is run on F. Once this is done, then for each function F, FP2 is run on F. Two get the previous...

...vm.org> wrote: > > Hi Vivek, > > vivek pandya via llvm-dev wrote: > > int foo() { > > return 12; > > } > > > > int bar(int a) { > > return foo() + a; > > } > > > > int (*fp)() = 0; > > int (*fp1)(int) = 0; > > > > int main() { > > fp = foo; > > fp(); > > fp1 = bar; > > fp1(15); > > return 0; > > } > > IMO it is waste of time trying to do a better job at the IPRA level on > IR like the above ^. LLVM shoul...

Hi all, Using XenServer with a RHEL6 beta VM, I have sar installed on the hypervisor and VM. If I do a ''md5sum < /dev/urandom'' to spike CPU usage on the VM, I see the indication on the XenCenter performance graph on CPU 0. It does increase quickly. Neither sar output gives any sort of indication that the CPU is being loaded. This VM is pinned to both processor 0 and 1

...he tested C source code is like: void foo() { printf("foo...\n"); } void bar() { printf("bar...\n"); } void foo1(int arg) { printf("foo1... %d..\n", arg); } void bar1(int arg) { printf("bar1... %d..\n", arg); } // function pointer void (*fp)() = 0; void (*fp1)(int) = 0; int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { int input = 0; printf("Hello\n"); fp = foo; fp(); fp = bar; fp(); fp1 = foo1; fp1(1); fp1 = bar1; fp1(2); } However, they produced the same .s assembly (test-full.s, test-single.s). I think the llc will produce difference .s files, since I...

...vivek pandya via llvm-dev wrote: > > > int foo() { > > > return 12; > > > } > > > > > > int bar(int a) { > > > return foo() + a; > > > } > > > > > > int (*fp)() = 0; > > > int (*fp1)(int) = 0; > > > > > > int main() { > > > fp = foo; > > > fp(); > > > fp1 = bar; > > > fp1(15); > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > IMO it is waste of time trying to do a better job at the IP...

...f=1; } else if (ret < 0) { /* error in the stream. Not a problem, just reporting it in case we (the app) cares. In this case, we don't. */ } else { /* we don't bother dealing with sample rate changes, etc, but you'll have to*/ fwrite(pcmout,1,ret,fp1); } if(eof) { break; } else { long ret=ov_read(&vf,pcmout,sizeof(pcmout),&current_section); if (ret == 0) { /* EOF */ eof=1; } else if (ret < 0) { /* error in the stream. Not a problem, just reporting it in case we (the...

Hi How can i enable this feature because: Running /opt/xensource/libexec/mpp-rdac --enable it says: No module mppUpper found for kernel 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs1.0.0.298.170582xen, aborting. There is no MPP modules... Terveisin/Regards, Pekka Panula, Sofor Oy - Jatkuvat palvelut _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

...pandya at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Professor, > > Thanks to bring this to notice, I tried out a simple test case with > indirect function call: > > int foo() { > return 12; > } > > int bar(int a) { > return foo() + a; > } > > int (*fp)() = 0; > int (*fp1)(int) = 0; > > int main() { > fp = foo; > fp(); > fp1 = bar; > fp1(15); > return 0; > } > > I have experimented with indirect call specially which are due to use of function pointers as shown in above example: Following code in RegUsageInfoPropagate.cpp handles this k...

Greetings folks! In working on a new optimization pass (splitting cold regions into separate functions based on branch probabilities) I've run into some limitations of the current pass manager infrastructure. After chatting about this with Nick, it seems that there are some pretty systematic weaknesses of the current design and implementation (but not with the fundamental concepts or

...; > > int foo() { >> > > return 12; >> > > } >> > > >> > > int bar(int a) { >> > > return foo() + a; >> > > } >> > > >> > > int (*fp)() = 0; >> > > int (*fp1)(int) = 0; >> > > >> > > int main() { >> > > fp = foo; >> > > fp(); >> > > fp1 = bar; >> > > fp1(15); >> > > return 0; >> > > } >> > >> > IMO it is waste of...

Hi, all, Is the Xen currently compatible with the InfiniBand? I found some information about the Smart I/O module, but it was posted in 2006. Is the module still maintained? Or, are there any up-to-date alternatives for that? Many thanks, Chiu _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > ... because usually a module pass operates on entire module (e.g. > inliner) and it does not require information specific to a function. > If your pass need info collected by a function pass then why not > structure your pass as a function pass and run it for all function in > a module ? I very much