search for: fedpkg

.../mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > > > Yes, I have seen it available for Fedora but was hoping it would be made available for both Centos 6 and 7 as well. > I am testing to see how much work needs to be done. I got it to build the geany part easily for EL7. Just do the following fedpkg clone geany cp geany fedpkg srpm fedpkg switch-branch epel7 vi geany.spec # change 1.32 to 1.34.1 fedpkg mockbuild el6 looks like it does not have new enough versions of vte and some other parts to work. -- Stephen J Smoogen.

...gt;>> Yes, I have seen it available for Fedora but was hoping it would be made available for both Centos 6 and 7 as well. >>> >> I am testing to see how much work needs to be done. I got it to build >> the geany part easily for EL7. Just do the following >> >> fedpkg clone geany >> cp geany >> fedpkg srpm >> fedpkg switch-branch epel7 >> vi geany.spec >> # change 1.32 to 1.34.1 >> fedpkg mockbuild >> >> el6 looks like it does not have new enough versions of vte and some >> other parts to work. >> >...

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:01, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > > generates it. Hope

...> > > > > Yes, I have seen it available for Fedora but was hoping it would be made available for both Centos 6 and 7 as well. > > > > I am testing to see how much work needs to be done. I got it to build > the geany part easily for EL7. Just do the following > > fedpkg clone geany > cp geany > fedpkg srpm > fedpkg switch-branch epel7 > vi geany.spec > # change 1.32 to 1.34.1 > fedpkg mockbuild > > el6 looks like it does not have new enough versions of vte and some > other parts to work. > The major problem with el6 is the lack of a...

...een it available for Fedora but was hoping it would be made available for both Centos 6 and 7 as well. > >>> > >> I am testing to see how much work needs to be done. I got it to build > >> the geany part easily for EL7. Just do the following > >> > >> fedpkg clone geany > >> cp geany > >> fedpkg srpm > >> fedpkg switch-branch epel7 > >> vi geany.spec > >> # change 1.32 to 1.34.1 > >> fedpkg mockbuild > >> > >> el6 looks like it does not have new enough versions of vte and some >...

FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable anything other than the default repositories. So, it'd appear to at least be in the stream. geany-1.34.1-2.fc29.x86_64 On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:53 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > On 01/04/2019 04:17 AM, H wrote: > > Does anyone know if Geany 1.34 is headed to one of the repositories? I

Hi Team, I was trying to install the Nagios server in Centos 7. I had downloaded and unzipped the Nagios server and it's plugins file. As per the installation instructions I ran the commands in the concerned folders of ./configure , make , make install for both the core and the Nagios plugins. I am not able to figure out the issue behind that it is not working It did got installed using

.... I will try to come up with an > exact list soon. I am doing the process manually to ensure that this does not happen. Basically my method is for a given package called appropriately pkg: cd R-pkg less R-pkg.spec # read file to ensure that it is safe to build it if it is safe then I run: $ fedpkg switch-branch f32 && git merge master && git push && fedpkg build -- target=f32-build-side-24797 && fedpkg switch-branch master; cd .. the idea, of course, is that if the merge fails then the case needs to be dealt manually. FWIW most of the credit goes to Tom (sp...

...nually to ensure that this does not happen. > Ah, great, thanks for being careful. > Basically my method is for a given package called appropriately pkg: > > cd R-pkg > less R-pkg.spec # read file to ensure that it is safe to build it > > if it is safe then I run: > > $ fedpkg switch-branch f32 && git merge master && git push && fedpkg build -- > target=f32-build-side-24797 && fedpkg switch-branch master; cd .. > > the idea, of course, is that if the merge fails then the case needs to be > dealt manually. > For simple bumps...

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.48.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > There are a few of those, but not many. Hi Tom, I noticed that for example in R-assertthat you have used the bcond: %bcond_with check would not it be better to use bootstrap instead to take advantage of: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping I am asking for curiosity since from now on we will

...9.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm [...] [root at troll-1 noarch]# rpm -ivh fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: bodhi-client is needed by fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch fedora-cert = 0.5.9.4-1.el6 is needed by fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch fedpkg >= 1.0 is needed by fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch koji is needed by fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch mock is needed by fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch redhat-rpm-config is needed by fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch rpmdevtools is needed by...

I'm on libguestfs Fedora git master branch: $ git log | head -1 commit 8eb1aa2406632eb4202bbd976459334854295a77 $ yum-builddep libguestfs $ fedpkg local Results in: ========== . . . make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/kashyap/fedora-packaging/libguestfs/master/libguestfs-1.25.18/gobject' Making all in docs make[4]: Entering directory `/home/kashyap/fedora-packaging/libguestfs/master/libguestfs-1.25.18/gobject/docs' make[4]: Nothing to...

...bguestfs/nbdkit/blob/0632acc76bfeb7d70d3eefa42fc842ce6b7be4f8/plugins/tmpdisk/tmpdisk.c#L182 I did a bit of testing to try to see if this is really feasible, and yes I think it is. Discussion below, experimental results first ... I compiled qt5-qtwebkit from Rawhide dist-git by running the "fedpkg local" command. Version: qt5-qtwebkit-5.212.0-0.46.alpha4.fc33 Host: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor Disks: Fast NVME disks, but using dm-crypt and LVM. Compiling qtwebkit normally (baseline): 28m19.921s baseline with nosync enabled: 28m12.67s nbdkit file plugin...

On Friday, 26 June 2020 10.47.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would > support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate > it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to > "%bcond_without check". The only difference with bootstrap is that > "bootstrap" is recognized and a suffix ~b...

...to do this dance once > a year for the releases that we deem worth (I would expect that to be rawhide > and the latest stable). > > Forgive me if the question does not make sense since I am still trying to make > sense of this maze. :-) I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to "%bcond_without check". The only difference with bootstrap is that "bootstrap" is recognized and a suffix ~bootstrap can be adde...

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 12:09, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 26 June 2020 10.47.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would > > support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate > > it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to > > "%bcond_without check". The only difference with bootstrap is that > > "bootstrap" is recogn...

...h source repo are kept the package metadata, specs and patches, but in other repos, epel for example it only versions specs and patches, all binary files are downloaded in the time that the srpms are built to send to mock (koji in their case), fedora is swiching from a Makefile per package to a fedpkg tool to work with package sources. I see that a friend will be spectool, and some of scripting i can get a build system from source version control, but i think that this already is made, so i'm don't want to reinvent the well, i prefer help other people in make more robust system. The...

First system-config-network is not part of CentOS/RHEL 6, now I don't see system-config-bind either. Is there an alternative (GUI) way to manage the bind DNS server? Emmett

...s. It could > easily be a new bug in the package itself. > > If anyone has access to that builder, it might be interesting to get a > process listing, or strace of whatever process is hanging. Dan Horak added: > it's a deadlock in the tests, not in make. Reproduced with "fedpkg local" in a cycle. > sharkcz 1649225 0.0 0.0 222288 3904 pts/5 S+ 06:24 0:00 /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.RXcMRr > sharkcz 1649230 0.0 0.0 10372 3248 pts/5 S+ 06:24 0:00 make -j4 check > sharkcz 1658088 0.0 0.0 251236 3400 pts/5 Sl+ 06:25 0:00 /home/sharkcz/nbdkit/nbdkit-1.19.3/server/...

On 05/12/2019 19:48, S?rgio Basto wrote: > I made the packages [1] (BTW I'm a fedora packager maintainer ). > > [1] https://github.com/sergiomb2/sambaad You have used heimdal and not MIT, haven't you ? > >>> I just migrate the users and his password nothing more ... I had >>> to >>> remove a lot of fields, OU(s) etc for example: [1] . >> Just