search for: dpkg

Hi, this morining I was trying to compile xen 3.1 on my Debian Etch (AMD64). I have a little problem with gcc-multilib. It depends on many packages that don't exist in Etch. So I brutally remove it from debian/control and then dpkg-buildpackage. There was some warning on compilation: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dpkg-shlib...

I tried your procedure, that's to say: sudo apt-get build-dep xapian-bindings sudo apt-get install php5-dev php5-cli apt-get source xapian-bindings cd xapian-bindings-1.2.* rm debian/control env PHP_VERSIONS=5 debian/rules maint debuild -e PHP_VERSIONS=5 -us -uc cd .. sudo dpkg -i php5-xapian_*.deb Though, it is failing with this error message: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: warning: using a gain-root-command while being root dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: export CPPFLAGS from...

Hi Olly and co, On an Ubuntu 15.10, following the docs at https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/PHP%20Bindings%20Package When running debuild -e PHP_VERSIONS=5 -us -uc I get (sorry for the French): " dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: paquet source xapian-bindings dpkg-buildpackage: version source 1.2.21-2.1 dpkg-buildpackage: distribution source unstable dpkg-buildpackage: source chang? par Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org> dpkg-source --before-build xapian-binding...

I have done some printf profiling and found that supermin's calls to dpkg for individual packages are quite expensive. Here are some patches that gather all information on demand where possible. On my Debian/unstable-based workstation at home, preparing a minimal appliance using $ ./supermin --use-installed --prepare bash -o supermin.d now takes ~3.5s (previously ~15s...

...failed: Could not set ''present on ensure: Read-only file system - /tmp/puppet20120216-1063-18q7lsz-0 at /tmp/vagrant-puppet/manifests/vagrant.pp:15 err: /Stage[main]/Etc/Package[python-psycopg2]/ensure: change from purged to present failed: Execution of ''/usr/bin/apt-get -q -y -o DPkg::Options::=--force-confold install python-psycopg2'' returned 100: W: Not using locking for read only lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run ''sudo dpkg --configure -a'' to correct the problem. err: /Stage[main]/Python::Gunicorn/File[/v...

...in the c-api test: ,---- | libguestfs: error: strings: /abssymlink: strings: error while loading | shared libraries: libbfd-2.24-multiarch.so: cannot open shared object | file: No such file or directory `---- The problem here is that I have the binutils-multiarch package installed which has used dpkg-divert(8) to override the "regular" binutils binaries. ,---- | $ dpkg-divert --list /usr/bin/strings | diversion of /usr/bin/strings to /usr/bin/strings.single by binutils-multiarch `---- I have been able to reproduce the problem with a minimal appliance (again, with binutils-multiarch...

Hello, I am facing a problem when rebuilding Samba 3.4.8dfsg2 on Debian Testing. Command used: "dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot --source-option=--format=1.0" Linking bin/smbcontrol /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.4/../../../../lib/libunwind-ptrace.a(_UPT_access_fpreg.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `_UPT_reg_offset' can not be used when making a shared object;...

dpkg used to ship with a symlink /usr/sbin/dpkg-divert -> ../bin/dpkg-divert that recently got removed nd caused breakage (libguestfs build failures) because configure had chosen the wrong binary. --- configure.ac | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure....

...rote: >> On an Ubuntu 15.10, following the docs at >> https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/PHP%20Bindings%20Package >> >> When >> >> running debuild -e PHP_VERSIONS=5 -us -uc >> >> I get (sorry for the French): >> >> >> " >> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc >> dpkg-buildpackage: paquet source xapian-bindings >> dpkg-buildpackage: version source 1.2.21-2.1 >> dpkg-buildpackage: distribution source unstable >> dpkg-buildpackage: source chang? par Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org> >&gt...

--- configure.ac | 1 + src/config.ml.in | 1 + src/dpkg.ml | 1 + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 2141540..99ea913 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ AC_PATH_PROG(APT_GET,[apt-get],[no]) AC_PATH_PROG(DPKG,[dpkg],[no]) AC_PATH_PROG(DPKG_DEB,[dpkg-deb],[no]) AC_PATH_PROG(...

...R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 I hope that this is an appropriate forum for seeking help for building rpy against the lenny-cran R packages. Sincerely, Kouros Kouros Owzar Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University kolmogorov:/tmp/rpy-1.0.3# debuild -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: warning: using a gain-root-command while being root dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value: dpkg-buildpackage: set LDFLAGS to default value: dpkg-buildpackage: set FFLAGS to defaul...

? Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:46:53 -0500 Benjamin Tyner <btyner at gmail.com> ?????: > my platform info: > > Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) > Running under: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS Quick things first: have you installed all the build-dependencies? apt build-dep r-base (maybe with --install-suggests? haven't tried that in a while) should do that. In particular, the build

...Fetched 18.7MB in 40s (461kB/s) gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on configuration file `/home/xavier/.gnupg/gpg.conf' gpg: Signature made Fri 05 Sep 2008 04:12:56 PM EDT using DSA key ID 387EE263 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found dpkg-source: extracting wine in wine-1.1.4~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04 dpkg-source: unpacking wine_1.1.4~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: applying ./wine_1.1.4~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04-0ubuntu1.diff.gz dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value: dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -...

...e I can delete a similar file in the same directory - fsck -f doesn't find any error on the partition - the partition is mounted rw If this is not the right place to submit this bug because it's a kernel bug or if you need further information, tell me. Thanks Alain root ~ #stat /var/lib/dpkg/info/groff.postrm File: "/var/lib/dpkg/info/groff.postrm" Size: 202 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 Regular File Device: 1606h/5638d Inode: 48907 Links: 1 Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Access: Tue Jan 29 08:50:53 200...

...2016 at 04:51:35PM -0500, Yannick Warnier wrote: > On an Ubuntu 15.10, following the docs at > https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/PHP%20Bindings%20Package > > When > > running debuild -e PHP_VERSIONS=5 -us -uc > > I get (sorry for the French): > > > " > dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc > dpkg-buildpackage: paquet source xapian-bindings > dpkg-buildpackage: version source 1.2.21-2.1 > dpkg-buildpackage: distribution source unstable > dpkg-buildpackage: source chang? par Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org> > dpkg-source --bef...

...Version: 3.0.4-1-1 Severity: minor Starting from a fresh source package, if you build the package once and then attempt to build it again, there are file permissions not being cleaned up that then cause warnings when building the source package. Here is the section of the build log: dh_clean dpkg-source -b xen-3.0-3.0.4-1 dpkg-source: building xen-3.0 using existing xen-3.0_3.0.4-1.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building xen-3.0 in xen-3.0_3.0.4-1-1.diff.gz dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of `debian/patches/not-reinvent-u dev.dpatch' will not be represented in diff dpkg-source: war...

As I have said: sssd-ad works fine with sernet packages on redhat based distros. Have you tried this? apt-get install sssd-ad samba-libs- Notice the - at the end Found here: http://serverfault.com/questions/250224/how-do-i-get-apt-get-to-ignore-some-dependencies After this, try to resolve the dependencies of the sssd-ad.so file as I have written. Regards Tim Am 31. M?rz 2015 12:22:18 MESZ,

f093ba80e0918484838dba46a747ffaecf983fb3 caused a regression (startup failure) when dpkg is not installed. Simple fix with simple test for it. Pino Toscano (2): dpkg: do not always run dpkg_primary_arch tests: add a basic run test src/dpkg.ml | 4 ++-- tests/Makefile.am | 3 ++- tests/test-basic.sh | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)...

...rap a 32 bits domU into a 64 bits dom0. debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=libc6-xen,firmware-bnx2,linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686,linux-modules-xen-686,linux-image-xen-686,grub --components=main,contrib,non-free lenny /mnt/xen http://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian But i have this problem at the end : dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-xen-686: linux-image-xen-686 depends on linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686; however: Package linux-image-2.6.26-1-...

...: SHELL := sh -e Does that actually work ? Colour me surprised. I wonder why it isn't done more widely. * There were a bunch of complaints from lintian. * I followed the instructions in debian/README.source.md and my first attempt to build a source package failed [1]. Using dpkg-buildpackage -uc -ui -us -B instead worked. This should be documented in README.source.md. If we don't change the whole git workflow; I'm afraid I'm going to reopen that, but that'll be a separate message. Thanks, Ian [1] zealot:xen> dpkg-source -b . dpkg-source: info: u...