search for: fddi

...he MTU for your interface. However, you'll probably see little if any difference and you may effect performance for not only you, but your router(s) and that in turn would effect your listeners. Unless you have control over the routers and know what type of topology the upstream connect runs (FDDI, ATM, etc) then there is really no point in playing with the packet size. Most OS's by default are already using optimized packet sizes. HTH, Sean.. -- A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish. --Chevy Chase, Caddyshack _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_...

...factors. Linux sets (along with a few other OS's I'm sure) its MTU to 1500. The problem is, if you set it longer then it will most likely be frag'd by your router. If that router does not, then another will. I think MTU for ppp interfaces are smaller. Likewise, if your backbone is FDDI, it has a large frame (somewhere in the 8000 range I believe is the default). I'd give you some accurate numbers but the book is at home and I'm at work. :( To better answer your questions, it just depends. On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Kelly Lee Myers wrote: > And just what exactly is an...

...eBSD was mentioned as an alternative. Some seem to have had better luck with this than with with the linux firewall code. Others seem to be very happy with the linux implementation. Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> wrote: > Have a look at drawbridge, a filtering bridge that runs at fddi speeds. > > ftp://coast.cs.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/TAMU/ Robert Hardy <rhardy@aurora.carleton.ca> wrote: > IMHO from what I''ve seen so far Linux firewalling is still too immature to > depend on. You could depend on a firewall based on 2.0.x code however, > it...

The problem I mentioned a day ago is now getting worse. message log: kernel: PCI Master abort kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00230004 kernel : printing eip c02060a6 kernel : Oops: 0002 kernel : CPU: 1 kernel : EIP: 0010:[<c02060a6>] Not tainted ,... Some register dumps kernel: Process asterisk (pid: 23917, stackpage=c5aff0000) kernel: Stack: numbers:)

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |japs at adm.ku.dk ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-03-22 22:46 ------- *** Bug 816 has been marked as a

Is any way to detect changed MAC adresses? Someone taught change MACs peoples in my network and I have problems. E.g. Two computers working on one MAC, and one IP (static ARP and DHCP). WinXP is screaming some message... that two computers or more have the same IP. How can I find out who''s changed MAC?

...e. > > However, you'll probably see little if any difference and you may effect > performance for not only you, but your router(s) and that in turn would > effect your listeners. Unless you have control over the routers and know > what type of topology the upstream connect runs (FDDI, ATM, etc) then > there is really no point in playing with the packet size. Most OS's by > default are already using optimized packet sizes. > > HTH, > > Sean.. > > -- > A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish. > --Chevy Chase, Cadd...

Hello List, some time ago i already asked this, in the meanwhile i did not found a solution nor i have any idea why this happens. Scenario: Every now and then i get this urgent warning: 1 Time(s): Dead loop on virtual device br0, fix it urgently! Stephen Hemminger wrote (16.08.2006 20:09) this: > It looks like a bridge ended up including itself some how. Its for me unclear when this

...1" flag for the current behavior, > but have any other string passed through as the device: > IPAPPEND 1 > --same as now > IPAPPEND eth0 > --passes ip=#:#:#:#::eth0: > IPAPPEND eth1 > --passes ip=#:#:#:#::eth1: > IPAPPEND fd0 > --passes ip=#:#:#:#::fd0: for fddi devices or whatever. > Of course something like > IPDEVAPPEND eth0 > would be good or even better.

leuenagtig sserts fddi-net_yanaton pdbegg If someone tells you our site o"'"ffers cheap FDA a"-"pproved med_icat'ions with pre.scription, please don't just listen to them but to check our site by yourself. The order that is sent to your door via fast and reliable delivery service will pr...

Hi, I have a 1 GigaByte size file and want to remove some bytes from it. For this I must follow the next steps: (1) Create a new file. (2) Copy into it the bytes I will left from the original file. (3) Remove the original file. (4) Move the new file to be the original file. The problem with this process is that it uses lot of disk I/O. Actually only one disk block of the file is modified. Is

As Brian Ripley said this morning on 'r-help', a binary distribution of R 1.0.0 to run on Windows 95, 98, NT4.0 and 2000 on Intel/clone chips is available at CRAN (at least in Wien). The URL is http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/windows-NT/base/ See 'README.rw1000' for installation instructions and 'CHANGES' for a list of Windows specific news. As always,

As Brian Ripley said this morning on 'r-help', a binary distribution of R 1.0.0 to run on Windows 95, 98, NT4.0 and 2000 on Intel/clone chips is available at CRAN (at least in Wien). The URL is http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/windows-NT/base/ See 'README.rw1000' for installation instructions and 'CHANGES' for a list of Windows specific news. As always,

Hello gurus, I have samba fileserver 2.0.5a installed on Reliant UNIX 5.44 (Siemens UNIX). All works fine but now I need to get as much speed from it as it can provide. I have this UNIX box and an NT 4.0 Server in the same FDDI ring. When I try to copy an 180 Mb file via FTP to local hard disk the transfer rate is 1014,16 Kb/sec. But while copying it from the samba share to the same location by means of explorer this speed becomes 867,26 Kb/sec. This shows me that use of ordinary ftp is 16,9 percents faster than copy via...

...i Data Systems storage array connected to our server by fiber channel. Many of our users are on Citrix which connects to our SAMBA server via a Gigabit Ethernet connection. There are still others that are connecting directly from their PCs which are connected to 10/100 ethernet which then goes to a FDDI backbone which the Samba server is on directly. In the last six months, we've a significant upgrade in which we have gone from about 20% of our users being Win2k and 80% on Win9x to 90% Win2k and 10% Win9x. In the last week we have noticed some serious performance degredations. We found oursel...

SUBJECT: SAMBA digest 1690 ERROR: Text size exceeds maximum

I'm trying to maximize throughput between my Samba server and my Win2k (SP3 and 4) clients. Samba's configured to allow up to 64k packets and the server is on a GigE network (3com card, acenic driver) with SCSI UW2 drives (software RAID1 and RAID5 volumes). All clients are 100MB/sec FDX on a switched LAN. I can get sustained 35MB/sec transfers (read and write) on the disk subsystem

Hi, I've managed to capture some output from the log tail using debug level 4. I couldn't capture it from the beginning, and it seems the debug info isn't sent to the log file (is there a way to do that ?) Here's a snippet of the log being repeated a lot of times during the few seconds that I notice the stutter : -> [28/Feb/2001:12:43:13] DEBUG: sock_write_bytes_or_kick: -1

hi, I've written a start of an c32-module to do basic substition: add subst.c32 this is a start of a generic substition module --- commit 9a1f41a7e6599fe6a162197cd9ddc6610185e780 tree cfb799a0be9844926afe44e21b2eb96630666c44 parent 89478bdbfa7167bc1b627a478d042c99e46f06b7 author Maurice Massar <massar at unix-ag.uni-kl.de> Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:13:39 +0200 committer Maurice Massar

...eBSD was mentioned as an alternative. Some seem to have had better luck with this than with with the linux firewall code. Others seem to be very happy with the linux implementation. Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> wrote: > Have a look at drawbridge, a filtering bridge that runs at fddi speeds. > > ftp://coast.cs.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/TAMU/ Robert Hardy <rhardy@aurora.carleton.ca> wrote: > IMHO from what I've seen so far Linux firewalling is still too immature to > depend on. You could depend on a firewall based on 2.0.x code however, > it see...