search for: exclusion

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:25:04PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > The reset control API has two modes: exclusive access, where the driver > expects to have full and immediate control over the state of the reset > line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset > deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line > while inactive.

The reset control API has two modes: exclusive access, where the driver expects to have full and immediate control over the state of the reset line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line while inactive. Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting reset

Hi I have problems with Samba and hope some of you can help me. Below if I have add the error messages that are relevant. [root at roskilde mosek]# emacs /var/log/samba/log.172.16.0.108 File Edit Options Buffers Tools Help [2014/02/06 10:18:29.562405, 0] smbd/oplock.c:330(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file windows/intel/Composer-XE-2013.198/Documentation/csupport.txt --

Hi, I updated from Samba 2.2.5 to 2.2.8a. und Redhat 6.2 and since then, smbstatus shows strange values The dates and the pid's are wrong. Any ideas? Was there a change in a locking.tdb? Do I have to remove it? Greetings Hansj?rg 28643 DENY_NONE 0x3f407996 RDONLY LEVEL_II ?7??W? Tue Jan 6 22:38:12 1970 1633824626 0x706d622e NONE ?7??W? Thu Jan 1 02:00:00 1970 1836017711 0x56414143

Device exclusive page table entries are used to prevent CPU access to a page whilst it is being accessed from a device. Typically this is used to implement atomic operations when the underlying bus does not support atomic access. When a CPU thread encounters a device exclusive entry it locks the page and restores the original entry after calling mmu notifiers to signal drivers that exclusive

Hello I use a new samba server with LDAP support as PDC for some Windows2000 and WindowsXP machines. All is working nice. The useer can login with a user/password in the domain, we have remote profiles, the user can access the samba shares and print etc. But after some time (< 1 day) we get a smbstatus output like the attached file. Users are connected multiple times with the same share

I recently (a few weeks ago) installed 1.9.18p8 in order to get better performance with an Access Database, which along with adding a TCP_NODELAY in the [global] section has that working like a charm. Thing that's bugging me now is smbstatus. When I run it I see open files listed when I know that they aren't. The following output shows quite a few files open that aren't really. The

hello, can anybody explain or point me to a document that explain the locked files section produced by smbstatus -L (see below). what means denymode ? access ? what means exclusive+batch in the oplock section ? can anybody point me to a document explaining the way file locking works ? regards # smbstatus -L Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name

Device exclusive page table entries are used to prevent CPU access to a page whilst it is being accessed from a device. Typically this is used to implement atomic operations when the underlying bus does not support atomic access. When a CPU thread encounters a device exclusive entry it locks the page and restores the original entry after calling mmu notifiers to signal drivers that exclusive

I first asked this question at the end of October, got a response which didn't solve the problem, and have finally got back to the issue now. I'm running 2.2.7a, recently upgraded from 2.2.0 as Domain Logons for Win2K were suspected to be part of my problem. Anyway, the issue relates to AutoCAD (actually a vertical product called Land3) and a command which works with winXX boxes, but

got a problem with b75 that the zone with ip-exclusive just takes the identity of the global zone. For the primary nic there is no option to set its ip and hostname. When i change the host name and ip the hostname does not change and the networking goes weird for both the zone and global zone. sparc eri qfe There any bugs about or should this work fine? This message posted from

Hi, I''m trying to work out a solution for multiple zones with exclusive IP stacks, and existing on the same VLAN. For example, I have 3 zones on the same subnet (lets say 10.10.10.0/24), and want to put them in the same VLAN (let''s say 20). If they weren''t zones, I would plumb up e1000g20000 or equiv on each and off we go, but with zones and exclusive IP stack, I

...supply and demand. It goes further than that--independent scenes try in vain to exclude the masses from ruining their little parties, and technology firms and record companies sign exclusive deals with each other. In this day and age, it's impossible--and even counterproductive--to continue the exclusionary mentality that has permeated the record industry up to this point. There are too many new approaches being taken to limit music distribution to just one method. Likewise, it no longer makes sense to exclude fans from accessing music the music they want, since they're going to get what they...

On 3/27/23 19:14, Alistair Popple wrote: > Device exclusive page table entries are used to prevent CPU access to > a page whilst it is being accessed from a device. Typically this is > used to implement atomic operations when the underlying bus does not > support atomic access. When a CPU thread encounters a device exclusive > entry it locks the page and restores the original entry

Using samba 3.05 and the point and print features how does one setup tcp/ip ports for printing. After having loaded the print drivers using the APW all the printer ports show a local port on the samba server and all of my printers use a 192.168.10.X address. Is there anyway this can automatically happen without user intervention. I wasn't able to locate this info in the how to's.

Replied too early... Below: On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:04 PM, JF Bastien <jfb at google.com> wrote: > Thanks for the writeup, that is indeed pretty ugly. Simple > asm(:::"memory") isn't sufficient either, since the regalloc can decode to > spill :-( > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:22 PM, James Knight via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

I'm setting rsync up for the first time and would prefer to have the exclude file defined in the conf file, but the exclusions aren't honoured when I define the parameter in rsyncd.conf - although they are when I specify the file in an argument. The server is the remote system and both rsyncd.conf and the exclude file are the same on both local and remote systems. I'm attaching the test script and the conf file -...

http://dovecot.org/tools/nfstest.c I wrote a test utility that tests different ways to flush NFS attribute cache and data cache. Please test in your NFS setup and show me the results, so I can make Dovecot v1.1 works well with NFS. Run the test several times (3 should be enough) to make sure the output stays the same, because the attribute cache flushes might incorrectly say "OK". And

For the enforcing=0, is that referring to SELinux? If so, we are not running SELinux. On 08/31/2016 11:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Try booting with enforcing=0 and if that fixes it, you need to find out > what security label is needed for gluster.

Hi, I'm trying to use R to cluster words with related meanings. Does anyone know of a non-hierarchical clustering method in R that produces non-exclusive clusters? With non-exclusive, I mean that words should be allowed to be part of multiple clusters. So my data matrix would look something like: T1 T2 T3 CLOWN_N 0 1 0 BANK_N 3 0 2 RIVER_N 0 0 2 FLOW_V 0 0 3 MONEY_N 2 0 0 PAY_V 2 0 0 The