search for: exception_ptr

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "exception_ptr".

2014 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] [ exception_ptr ] libcxx doesn't cope well with libcxxabi under linux
Hi, I'm under Ubuntu 13.10 amd64 I just compiled both my libcxx and my libcxxabi. I noticed this really weird behaviour, while trying to compile some C++11-compliant piece of code I get this error at runtime exception_ptr not yet implemented Aborted (core dumped) Now my experience tells me that this is something that can easily be related to the ABI, so I go to the official libcxxabi website and according to both the docs and documentation this ptr is there, it's available and implemented. The real problem is...
2014 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] [ exception_ptr ] libcxx doesn't cope well with libcxxabi under linux
...nuele, On 4/30/14, 6:07 PM, Emanuele Cestari wrote: > Hi, > I'm under Ubuntu 13.10 amd64 I just compiled both my libcxx and my libcxxabi. > > I noticed this really weird behaviour, while trying to compile some > C++11-compliant piece of code I get this error at runtime > > exception_ptr not yet implemented > Aborted (core dumped) > Didn't you hit similar warnings when you built libc++abi & libc++? That would suggest that libc++ and libc++abi haven't been fully ported to your platform yet. > > What I would like to know is: there is a good reason for this or...
2018 Feb 09
2
[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
...n 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: ... >> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? ... > The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to crash with: > > exception_ptr not yet implemented This turns out to be caused by libc++ being compiled without -DLIBCXXRT. (In the FreeBSD base system build, we always add this option, so libc++ knows how to handle exceptions.) In the libc++ CMakeFiles, it appears to be governed by LIBCXX_CXX_ABI_LIBNAME, but it isn't be...
2018 Feb 11
2
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
...um.org> wrote: >> ... >>>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >>>> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? >> ... >>> The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to crash with: >>> >>> exception_ptr not yet implemented >> >> This turns out to be caused by libc++ being compiled without -DLIBCXXRT. (In the FreeBSD base system build, we always add this option, so libc++ knows how to handle exceptions.) >> >> In the libc++ CMakeFiles, it appears to be governed by LIBCXX_...
2018 Feb 09
0
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
...Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > ... >>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >>> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? > ... >> The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to crash with: >> >> exception_ptr not yet implemented > > This turns out to be caused by libc++ being compiled without -DLIBCXXRT. (In the FreeBSD base system build, we always add this option, so libc++ knows how to handle exceptions.) > > In the libc++ CMakeFiles, it appears to be governed by LIBCXX_CXX_ABI_LIBNAME,...
2018 Feb 12
0
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
...gt; ... >>>>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >>>>> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? >>> ... >>>> The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to crash with: >>>> >>>> exception_ptr not yet implemented >>> >>> This turns out to be caused by libc++ being compiled without -DLIBCXXRT. (In the FreeBSD base system build, we always add this option, so libc++ knows how to handle exceptions.) >>> >>> In the libc++ CMakeFiles, it appears to be gover...
2018 Feb 12
1
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
...>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >>>>>> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? >>>> ... >>>>> The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to crash with: >>>>> >>>>> exception_ptr not yet implemented >>>> >>>> This turns out to be caused by libc++ being compiled without -DLIBCXXRT. (In the FreeBSD base system build, we always add this option, so libc++ knows how to handle exceptions.) >>>> >>>> In the libc++ CMakeFiles, it app...
2014 Aug 28
5
[LLVMdev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 4 Now Available
We had to roll a release candidate 4 for the 3.5 release. It’s up at the normal place: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5 Please test it and report any major bugs you may find. Thanks! -bw
2018 Feb 09
0
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
....exception/except.nested/rethrow_nested.pass.cpp libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/throw_with_nested.pass.cpp libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/current_exception.pass.cpp libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/exception_ptr.pass.cpp libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/make_exception_ptr.pass.cpp libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/rethrow_exception.pass.cpp libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/uncaught/uncaught_exception.pass.cpp libc++ :: s...
2018 Feb 09
2
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in >> a better state now. >> >> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. >> >>
2018 Jan 20
0
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:11, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >> On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >>>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg
2018 Jan 19
3
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: >> >> Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> Start
2019 Aug 14
9
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc2 Binaries will be added as they become available. The tag went in roughly one week behind schedule (see "Upcoming Releases" at https://llvm.org), but