search for: evolv

Hello, HP offers BIOS firmware updates. After applying these to an affected server, Xen Hypervisor starts normally. -- Regards, Andreas Haase [zu unserer Webseite]<http://www.evolver.de/> Unsere Top-Produkte: ? evolverOAS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolveroas/> ? evolverCMS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolvercms/> ? evolverSSO<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolversso/> ? Themenportale<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/mietsoftware/> ? evolverGU...

...same arguments to the DTRACE_* macros that mark the probe locations, and (b) Establish the appropriate provider stability, which is done by #pragma D attributes after the provider foo { } declaration. Here is an example set of declarations from plockstat in libc: #pragma D attributes Evolving/Evolving/ISA provider plockstat provider #pragma D attributes Private/Private/Unknown provider plockstat module #pragma D attributes Private/Private/Unknown provider plockstat function #pragma D attributes Evolving/Evolving/ISA provider plockstat name #pragma D attributes Evolving/Evolving/ISA p...

...ey) < keys[bid]){ currNode = knodes[currNode].right_id; } else{ break; } } } I expect to extract a SCEV expression for the variable *keys*, however, using ScalarEvolution I also get an expression (using SE->getSCEV) for *knodes*. Since *knodes* does not evolve in terms of the loop induction variable I wasn't expecting to receive a SCEV expression for it. Can anyone please point out how SCEV expressions evolving in terms of the loop induction variable can be distinguished from expressions that are not. -Hashim University of Illinois at Urbana-Champa...

...rrNode].right_id; > } > else{ > break; > } > } > } > > I expect to extract a SCEV expression for the variable *keys*, however, > using ScalarEvolution I also get an expression > (using SE->getSCEV) for *knodes*. Since *knodes* does not evolve in terms > of the loop induction variable I wasn't expecting to receive a SCEV > expression for it. Can anyone please point out how SCEV expressions > evolving in terms of the loop induction variable > can be distinguished from expressions that are not. > > -Hashim > Unive...

...gt; So, here we have an even more serious problem. I can only see these options: 1. Ignore releases, everyone works on trunk - Changes are gradual 1.a No API changes - No code breakage, we can use compilers as old as Stallman - Every platform is covered - The toolchain doesn't evolve 1.b. API changes between each release - API changes under our feet, massive work all the time - Many API changes can happen at the same time - Warning time can be as little as one day - The toolchain evolves with time 2. Use stable releases, only core developers work on trunk...

> On 10 Nov 2019, at 07:00, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > recipe is not correct in the absolute: the delta from master does not mean it contains exactly what you want, you seem to assume that master didn't evolve between the time "patchbranch" was created. > Hi Mehdi, I’m doing it this way to make sure that master /actually/ contains “exactly what I want” (!). Of course the remote master could have evolved slightly during such steps, but that’s a cat-and-mouse game, that I don’t think that...

Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes: > I think there are two main problems here: > 1. People use trunk on side-projects because releases mean very little > in LLVM world > 2. We start adding new stuff as soon as a release is branched, and > that reduces warnings up to a few days > > We're all talking about problem 2, when in fact, I think the problem

...rda files in my data dir, but also a rather large sqlite db. Is R trying to do anything in particular to my data during the install? index or something? Is there anything I can do to make this step go faster? If this were a 1-time install, it wouldn't matter, but since this package is evolving as I'm using it, I find myself constantly needing to tweak some code here, or change something there, and this always requires another round of R CMD INSTALLing ... Is there something I can do to make this cycle turn around quicker? How do you guys deal with growing a package organica...

...------------------------------------------------------------------- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

I recently found that Halo was not properly displaying menu and other 2D items in any color except black. I didn't have this problem until I upgraded to wine 1.3.24. I use Fedora 14 with ATI Radeon HD. Here is a screenshot [img]http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg[/img] I think it has something to do with ATI proprietary driver conflict, since I can run in another PC with nVidia and it displays

Hey im having trouble with directx. 9 I have a black and gray models in portal and halo combat evolve. OS:Ubuntu 11.10 RAM:1.5 GFX:Intel gma 900 NOTE: portal and halo combat evolve do work in a windows OS, So do not say it wont run. RES:1024x768 Screen shot of bug: http://s1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa405/se7enjojo/?action=view&current=Screenshotat2011-12-02170852.png

bump? Any idea how to tackle this dark text and dark hud problem? I updated amd/ati catalyst to latest 12.1, and wine to 1.3.37, but won't fix the problem. Here is the image again. [Image: http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg ]

I am also having the same issue. I have upgraded to the latest wine in the Ubuntu repositories (1.3 beta), but that doesn't fix the issue and makes things worse my messing up my sound... anyway, here is the log file created as was requested in a previous post: http://pastebin.com/Fv2rfh6C The 1.4 RC is not available through the repos...at least not the repos I have. I'm not going to cry

Hi Jason, The long discussion made me wondering where this was going, but re-reading you original email [0], there was an acknowledgment of a potential future merge between the projects, and I can of make sense of the current picture. So you can forget about my question below! [0]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096576.html

...om the "Main supporter" to "Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big warning [1]. Quoting these main changes: "Eaton, has been the main NUT supporter in the past, between 2007 and 2011, continuing MGE UPS SYSTEMS efforts. ... The situation has evolved, and since 2011 Eaton does not support NUT anymore. This may still evolve in the future. But for now, please do not consider anymore that buying Eaton products will provide you with official support from Eaton, or a better level of device support in NUT." Considering that I'm still an E...

...re preparing to migrate our mail server to Azure and would like to integrate it vi AD Connect with our AD - Samba 4.7 upgrading to 4.11 (Thanks Louis!). Anyone willing to share the experience? I see on some not-so-old posts there is a problem syncing password hashes, but since samba is an ever evolving solution I would like to know how are you dealing with this? Thanks and best regards. -- *Marcio Merlone*

...------------------------------------------------------------------- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

...he context for previous list discussions, this is actually not such a ridiculous request. I know, we could solve this by moving to some mailing list software that folds previous replies like current mail readers do. But it's a lot of work for not much gain. While the text formatting hasn't evolved much since Usenet, I would hope the people have evolved during that same timeframe. You seem to have a lot of UPS experience, and it's a shame that we can't put it to a more constructive use. I'm still open to the doc/FAQ improvements we discussed in July. -- Charles Lepple clepple...

Hello everyone, The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support them and attract more. At the same time, the software itself has undergone some significant changes and improve...

...ot;Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big > warning [1]. > > Quoting these main changes: > > "Eaton, has been the main NUT supporter in the past, between 2007 and > 2011, continuing MGE UPS SYSTEMS efforts. > ... > The situation has evolved, and since 2011 Eaton does not support NUT > anymore. > This may still evolve in the future. > But for now, please do not consider anymore that buying Eaton products > will provide you with official support from Eaton, or a better level > of device support in NUT." > &gt...