search for: evolve

Hello, HP offers BIOS firmware updates. After applying these to an affected server, Xen Hypervisor starts normally. -- Regards, Andreas Haase [zu unserer Webseite]<http://www.evolver.de/> Unsere Top-Produkte: ? evolverOAS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolveroas/> ? evolverCMS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolvercms/> ? evolverSSO<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolversso/> ? Themenportale<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/mietsoftware/> ? evolverGUI...

> I have a code that has several probes with the same probename. When I define the probe to use a translator and then try to match for all the occurances of the probename in a D script I get the following error: > > dtrace: invalid probe specifier mpi__test$target:::RECV_REQ_ACT_EV { printf("%d %d", args[0]->bar, args[0]->baz); }: in action list: args[ ] may not be

...ey) < keys[bid]){ currNode = knodes[currNode].right_id; } else{ break; } } } I expect to extract a SCEV expression for the variable *keys*, however, using ScalarEvolution I also get an expression (using SE->getSCEV) for *knodes*. Since *knodes* does not evolve in terms of the loop induction variable I wasn't expecting to receive a SCEV expression for it. Can anyone please point out how SCEV expressions evolving in terms of the loop induction variable can be distinguished from expressions that are not. -Hashim University of Illinois at Urbana-Champai...

...rrNode].right_id; > } > else{ > break; > } > } > } > > I expect to extract a SCEV expression for the variable *keys*, however, > using ScalarEvolution I also get an expression > (using SE->getSCEV) for *knodes*. Since *knodes* does not evolve in terms > of the loop induction variable I wasn't expecting to receive a SCEV > expression for it. Can anyone please point out how SCEV expressions > evolving in terms of the loop induction variable > can be distinguished from expressions that are not. > > -Hashim > Univer...

...gt; So, here we have an even more serious problem. I can only see these options: 1. Ignore releases, everyone works on trunk - Changes are gradual 1.a No API changes - No code breakage, we can use compilers as old as Stallman - Every platform is covered - The toolchain doesn't evolve 1.b. API changes between each release - API changes under our feet, massive work all the time - Many API changes can happen at the same time - Warning time can be as little as one day - The toolchain evolves with time 2. Use stable releases, only core developers work on trunk -...

> On 10 Nov 2019, at 07:00, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > recipe is not correct in the absolute: the delta from master does not mean it contains exactly what you want, you seem to assume that master didn't evolve between the time "patchbranch" was created. > Hi Mehdi, I’m doing it this way to make sure that master /actually/ contains “exactly what I want” (!). Of course the remote master could have evolved slightly during such steps, but that’s a cat-and-mouse game, that I don’t think that c...

Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes: > I think there are two main problems here: > 1. People use trunk on side-projects because releases mean very little > in LLVM world > 2. We start adding new stuff as soon as a release is branched, and > that reduces warnings up to a few days > > We're all talking about problem 2, when in fact, I think the problem

Hi all, I'm putting together some common code + data into a custom package, everything is working out fine, but the ``R CMD INSTALL MyPackage`` call seems to take a particularly long time in the "**data" step: $ R CMD INSTALL MyPackage/ * installing to library ?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/ library? * installing *source* package ? MyPackage? ... ** R ** data

Hi, I have servers where shorewall6 won''t reject nor log: # cat /etc/shorewall6/zones fw firewall net ipv6 # cat /etc/shorewall6/interfaces net eth1 tcpflags (I also tried without "tcpflags", but no changes) # cat /etc/shorewall6/policy $FW all ACCEPT all all REJECT info # cat /etc/shorewall6/rules SECTION NEW (for testing, I removed all the rules) I am testing from

I recently found that Halo was not properly displaying menu and other 2D items in any color except black. I didn't have this problem until I upgraded to wine 1.3.24. I use Fedora 14 with ATI Radeon HD. Here is a screenshot [img]http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg[/img] I think it has something to do with ATI proprietary driver conflict, since I can run in another PC with nVidia and it displays

Hey im having trouble with directx. 9 I have a black and gray models in portal and halo combat evolve. OS:Ubuntu 11.10 RAM:1.5 GFX:Intel gma 900 NOTE: portal and halo combat evolve do work in a windows OS, So do not say it wont run. RES:1024x768 Screen shot of bug: http://s1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa405/se7enjojo/?action=view&current=Screenshotat2011-12-02170852.png

bump? Any idea how to tackle this dark text and dark hud problem? I updated amd/ati catalyst to latest 12.1, and wine to 1.3.37, but won't fix the problem. Here is the image again. [Image: http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg ]

I am also having the same issue. I have upgraded to the latest wine in the Ubuntu repositories (1.3 beta), but that doesn't fix the issue and makes things worse my messing up my sound... anyway, here is the log file created as was requested in a previous post: http://pastebin.com/Fv2rfh6C The 1.4 RC is not available through the repos...at least not the repos I have. I'm not going to cry

Hi Jason, The long discussion made me wondering where this was going, but re-reading you original email [0], there was an acknowledgment of a potential future merge between the projects, and I can of make sense of the current picture. So you can forget about my question below! [0]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096576.html

...om the "Main supporter" to "Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big warning [1]. Quoting these main changes: "Eaton, has been the main NUT supporter in the past, between 2007 and 2011, continuing MGE UPS SYSTEMS efforts. ... The situation has evolved, and since 2011 Eaton does not support NUT anymore. This may still evolve in the future. But for now, please do not consider anymore that buying Eaton products will provide you with official support from Eaton, or a better level of device support in NUT." Considering that I'm still an Ea...

Hi, We are preparing to migrate our mail server to Azure and would like to integrate it vi AD Connect with our AD - Samba 4.7 upgrading to 4.11 (Thanks Louis!). Anyone willing to share the experience? I see on some not-so-old posts there is a problem syncing password hashes, but since samba is an ever evolving solution I would like to know how are you dealing with this? Thanks and best

the establishment of an openvpn link sometimes fails. I tracked it down to network traffic with wrong Sourceport in the answer packet (should be 1300 not 1024): 2 1.119309000 aaa.185.165 bbb.162.192 UDP 58 Source port: 1300 Destination port: 1300 3 1.119446000 bbb.162.192 aaa.185.165 UDP 66 Source port: 1024 Destination port: 1300 and a collateral entry in the connection tracking table

...he context for previous list discussions, this is actually not such a ridiculous request. I know, we could solve this by moving to some mailing list software that folds previous replies like current mail readers do. But it's a lot of work for not much gain. While the text formatting hasn't evolved much since Usenet, I would hope the people have evolved during that same timeframe. You seem to have a lot of UPS experience, and it's a shame that we can't put it to a more constructive use. I'm still open to the doc/FAQ improvements we discussed in July. -- Charles Lepple clepple a...

Hello everyone, The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support them and attract more. At the same time, the software itself has undergone some significant changes and improvem...

...ot;Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big > warning [1]. > > Quoting these main changes: > > "Eaton, has been the main NUT supporter in the past, between 2007 and > 2011, continuing MGE UPS SYSTEMS efforts. > ... > The situation has evolved, and since 2011 Eaton does not support NUT > anymore. > This may still evolve in the future. > But for now, please do not consider anymore that buying Eaton products > will provide you with official support from Eaton, or a better level > of device support in NUT." > >...