search for: eligibility

Hi, Here i have a data frame like this, frame name is "dat" *NAME AGE ELIGIBLE* A 20 B 14 C 35 D 10 E 50 In this, i want to change the column '*ELIGIBLE*' status to '*YES*' If, AGE between 18 to 35 Which means that, i should get a put like

Hi I have a set of data with both quantitative and categorical predictors. After scaling of response variable, i looked for multicollinearity (VIF values) among the predictors and removed the predictors who were hinding some of the other significant predictors. I'm curious to know whether the predictors (who are not significant) while doing simple 'lm' will be involved in

Hi I have a set of data with both quantitative and categorical predictors. After scaling of response variable, i looked for multicollinearity (VIF values) among the predictors and removed the predictors who were hinding some of the other significant predictors. I'm curious to know whether the predictors (who are not significant) while doing simple 'lm' will be involved in

Hello Jeffery, Thank you for the information, but I was already aware of this. I still have many concerns about GCC from the links you sent yourself: >"A file is an "Independent Module" if it either requires the Runtime Library for execution after a Compilation >Process, or makes use of an interface provided by the Runtime Library, but is not otherwise based on the >

On 24 Sep 2007, at 09:18, Evan Cheng wrote: > +; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 -stats -info- > output-file - | grep asm-printer | grep 9 > +; change preceeding line form ... | grep 8 to ..| grep 9 since > +; with new fastcc has std call semantics causing a stack adjustment > +; after the function call > > Not sure if I understand this. Can you illustrate

...instruction following the call is a return. That is the > reason > why i pass the IsNextInstRet flag to TargetLowering::LowerCallTo. Right. But I think the right way to deal with this is to assume all the tail calls are eligible for tail call optimizations at this point. Then checks for eligibility and fix the call nodes after all the instructions are lowered. Evan > > > TargetLowering::LowerCallTo(SDOperand Chain, const Type *RetTy, > bool RetTyIsSigned, bool isVarArg, > unsigned CallingConv, bool isTailCall, >...

The ref manual states: The optional "tail" marker indicates whether the callee function accesses any allocas or varargs in the caller. If the "tail" marker is present, the function call is eligible for tail call optimization. Note that calls may be marked "tail" even if they do not occur before a ret instruction. Does "eligible" in the above mean that some

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Bot Tiger <bottiger1 at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there anything else besides GNU or any other targets in the future? > > My goal is to be able to not have all the binaries coming out to be GPL.. You do know that the GNU tools don't cause their output to be GPL'ed, right? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF and

Dear List, I'm currently investigating if the argument dispatch mechanism based on `...` could somehow be "generalized" to scenarios that involve `r` recipients located across `c` calling stack layers *and* combined with the S4 method mechanism (for those interested see

Hi Gabriel, and thanks for answering. I'm basically just trying to find a way to use the power of `...` in more complex scenarios and I'm well aware that this might not be the best approach ;-) Regarding your actual question: "Are you suggesting methods be dispatched based on the *contents* of ... [...]?" Yes, I guess currently I kind of do - but not on the argument *names*

Is there anything else besides GNU or any other targets in the future? My goal is to be able to not have all the binaries coming out to be GPL.. If not, I will have to go back to using C as an intermediate language. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090408/5216ab28/attachment.html>

...call is a return. That is the > > reason > > why i pass the IsNextInstRet flag to TargetLowering::LowerCallTo. > > Right. But I think the right way to deal with this is to assume all > the tail calls are eligible for tail call optimizations at this point. > Then checks for eligibility and fix the call nodes after all the > instructions are lowered. I am not sure that i understand where this point would be. As I view it the only place would be in LegalizeDAG.cpp in SDOperand SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDOperand Op) { ... case ISD::CALL: // The only option for this...

1. HFSC have 4 curve such sc, rc, ls, ul and 1.1 In leaf class can specify rc for guarantee service (bandwidth and delay) and If want to sharing fairness exceess service, we must specify ls and ul curve too (ls curve with paramater m2 specify at lease sharing bandwidth in that class will receive and ul curve mean maximum bandwidth in that class will receive) so i''m doubt .. about if i

...Sc with Merit or Distinction in a quantitative social science discipline. They must share our passion for data and be equally fascinated by what we can learn from them. In addition, we welcome candidates that also bring some practical experience gained in a commercial setting. There are strict ESRC eligibility criteria, so please see http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding-and-guidance/postgraduates/prospective-students/eligibility/index.aspx before applying. The CDRC Website is http://cdrc.ac.uk/. To apply, please submit a CV and supporting letter of application, demonstrating how you feel your skills and experi...

Hi, It would be nice if we can get ISSN for wiki.centos.org. Any plans? I know assigning ISSN for blogs is being held now. If we have ISSN it might help to get more people to contribute. Just the hint. David

Janko, I'm not entirely sure I understand your proposal. Are you suggesting methods be dispatched based on the *contents* of ... (ie which arguments are in there)? This seems like it would be pretty different from how dispatch behaves now, which is entirely class based. Even the dispatching based on ... via dots methods is class based, having nothing to do AFAIK with the argument names. From

Fellow Asterisk Users, I'm running Asterisk 1.2.5, and I've configured basic call queueing using agents. The problem I'm having is that agents who are on DND are still considered (by Asterisk) to be eligible to take calls. This means that calls will hit voicemail even when other agents who are not on DND are available. Any ideas how I can make agents ineligible to receive calls

Hola eRReros, Necesito extraer datos de un dataframe según uno de los factores. La cosa sería algo así: df.nuevo <- iris[iris$Species=="setosa"|iris$Species=="virginica",] Que me crea un df nuevo solo con las filas en que Species es setosa o virginica. El problema es que mi factor de interés tiene 22 niveles y a veces he de seleccionar 13, 10, 8 niveles o números así.

If I'm not mistaken Q clearance would require US citizenship. ‎

Dear R-help Listers, The following two student competitions are of interests to the now many student R package developers. I'd appreciate your help in spreading them. #1. John M. Chambers Statistical Software Award 2018 The Statistical Computing Section of the American Statistical Association announces the competition for the John M. Chambers Statistical Software Award. In 1998 the