Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "eetimes".
2007 Jan 27
5
H.264 *Not Patented*
The H.264 codec patent by Qualcomm has been ruled invalid by a San
Diego Federal jury:
http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197001066 .
That means that H.264 codecs can now be written, distributed and revised
freely under any license their authors choose, including GPL, public
domain, or any other, and $free now that royalties are no longer
required.
How does H.264 compare wit...
2007 Aug 01
1
lossless codecs in wireless headphones.
Hey,
just came across this article.
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=ZLCZZJMVGJYNYQSNDLSCKHA?articleID=201202250
.
Many of you would be already aware of this. It mentions flac also. i feel it
is a good segment(stereo wireless headsets over bluetooth) to push flac
given very light decoder and using encoder at low compress...
2004 Sep 18
0
microdrive-based camcorders
Here are a few sentences from a Sept. 17, 2004 article in th EETimes.
http://www.eetimes.com/sys/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=47900195
******************** begin excerpts ************************
Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (JVC) will use Microdrive CompactFlash-sized
cards with a 1-inch hard-disk drive in its digital video cameras. The camera
will be capabl...
2011 Aug 21
4
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target
...be too expensive).
nick.... the Zynq-7000 series of Dual-Core Cortex A9 800mhz 28nm CPUs
have an on-board Series 7 Artix-7 or Kinect-7 FPGA (depending on the
Zynq range). and that's on the same silicon IC :) so, price is not
an object any more [assuming reasonable volume].
here's the eetimes article which mentions that the low-end version of
the 7000 series will be under $USD 15 in mass-volume:
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4213637/Xilinx-provides-first-product-details-for-EPP-ARM-based-devices
so - does that change things at all? :)
i assumed that it would be possible t...
2011 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> i was just writing this:
> http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/
>
> when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would
> greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible.
>
> put these together:
>
2011 Aug 20
2
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target
i was just writing this:
http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/
when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would
greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible.
put these together:
http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/epp/zynq-7000/index.htm
2011 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target
...k.... the Zynq-7000 series of Dual-Core Cortex A9 800mhz 28nm CPUs
> have an on-board Series 7 Artix-7 or Kinect-7 FPGA (depending on the
> Zynq range). and that's on the same silicon IC :) so, price is not
> an object any more [assuming reasonable volume].
>
> here's the eetimes article which mentions that the low-end version of
> the 7000 series will be under $USD 15 in mass-volume:
> http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4213637/Xilinx-provides-first-product-details-for-EPP-ARM-based-devices
>
> so - does that change things at all? :)
No, because that...
2010 Aug 05
1
One question about comparison between HE-AAC v2 and CELT
Hi ,
I visited celt website. I saw the comparison between AAC-LD with celt. But
how about the HE-AAC? If the scenario is that we limit the bandwidth to
50kbps, will music encoded by HE-AAC v2 be better than CELT? What's HE-AAC
v2's delay?
Thank you very much.
Alex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2004 Feb 10
3
DV format patent status
Hi folks,
I was curious what's known about the patent situation with the DV
format. Google turns up a number of press articles describing it as an
"open standard with no associated licensing fees" but also, for example,
US Patent number 5,691,81 which, while I've not done a careful
comparison of the claims, sounds like it covers the block-rearrangement
scheme that's the