search for: edor

...ot; LC_COLLATE="POSIX" LC_MONETARY="POSIX" LC_MESSAGES="POSIX" LC_PAPER="POSIX" LC_NAME="POSIX" LC_ADDRESS="POSIX" LC_TELEPHONE="POSIX" LC_MEASUREMENT="POSIX" LC_IDENTIFICATION="POSIX" LC_ALL= And if you try Fedora rawhide: $ locale LANG=C.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="C.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="C.UTF-8" LC_TIME="C.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="C.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="C.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="C.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="C.UTF-8" LC_NAME="C.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="C.UTF-8&q...

...a at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > As expected of a new major release of R, there is a break in compatibility > for R packages. From the NEWS entry for 4.0.0: > > Packages need to be (re-)installed under this version (4.0.0) of R. > > This has two impacts on Fedora/EPEL. > > 1. Users who update to 4.0.0 will need to rebuild any/all packages > installed from CRAN. > 2. Fedora/EPEL R packages will need to be rebuilt for 4.0.0. > > For EPEL, #2 is less impactful (there are not that many R packages in EPEL) > but for Fedora, this is a pretty...

...ced to do rebuilds for everything as a result of 4.0.0 and > 3.4.0. That's just coincidence, because if you browse old NEWS, you can see "packages [doing this or that] need to be re(-)installed" here and there if most minor versions: maybe there wasn't any of such packages in Fedora, maybe a mass rebuild or an update fixed the issue before anyone noticed... It's just that we don't have any mechanism to detect that unless a user complains. > Does anyone know if upstream has any sort of commitment to ABI here that we > could depend on (e.g. only breaking on major...

On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 21:41, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 11 May 2020 16.47.55 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > AFAIK, there's this commitment only for patch versions. In fact, the > > path for the personal library is: > > > > ~/R/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-library/<major>.<minor>/ > > > > so, when you install

On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 00:23, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Thursday, 14 May 2020 21.30.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Mmmh... but then you have to change that in the packages' SPEC and > > rebuild them anyway when you update R. So... what's the advantage of > > this? > > We already have other examples of how to do this with less

On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 11:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Thursday, 14 May 2020 23.58.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > But we still have to rebuild the packages anyway, and this setup > > doesn't force us to actually rebuild them, nor the user to update > > them. So a user could end up with R major.minor and a bunch of > > packages

...n34-3.4.10-10.fc32.x86_64 > python35-3.5.9-1.fc32.x86_64 > python36-3.6.10-2.fc32.x86_64 > python37-3.7.7-1.fc32.x86_64 > python3-3.8.2-2.fc32.x86_64 > python39-3.9.0~a6-1.fc32.x86_64 > > The only version where I have python packages installed is for 3.8 (since I am > using Fedora 32 - as it can be seen above). > > That allows me to test the base version for python without having to compile > every time and every where I want to use it. > > And although it was not my initial motivation but you probably saw the > discussion today on R-devel (Rd) about peopl...

Hi Gavin, On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:15, Gavin Simpson <ucfagls at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear list, > > What is the recommended incantation on Fedora 32 to swap out the > openblas BLAS that the packaged (rpm) version of R-core installs for > ATLAS? I'm afraid there is no official mechanism in place to do that yet. There was a proposal [1], but it was never pushed forward due to some issues and lack of time. There's a simple hack...

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 23:03, Gavin Simpson <ucfagls at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks (again) I?aki. > > There was a typo in my reply above. I should have said: I *can't* > answer the question re USE_LOCKING=1. :) > Those other suggestions are really helpful too; I really didn't > understand what the difference was (I'm still not clear what the >

On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 04:42, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora > R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With > the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and > R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest > versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when...

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 17:01, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > > > Tom > > What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? > > I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I >

Oh, and maybe in this process we could add to all packages the requirement on R(ABI) = 4 that Tom implemented. On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:42, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > generates it. Hope it helps. > > I?aki > > On Wed, 24...

...8.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > There are a few of those, but not many. > > Hi Tom, > I noticed that for example in R-assertthat you have used the bcond: > > %bcond_with check > > would not it be better to use bootstrap instead to take advantage of: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping > > I am asking for curiosity since from now on we will need to do this dance once > a year for the releases that we deem worth (I would expect that to be rawhide > and the latest stable). > > Forgive me if the question does no...

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 12:09, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 26 June 2020 10.47.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would > > support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate > > it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to > >

...H/F standards, but has something > happened in the RPM ecosystem recently to poison the -spec/autoconf > relationship? Did something change in rgdal's flags from 1.5-10 to 1.5-12? Because the former installs fine. You can see in [1] that it fails since the last update. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/iucar/cran/package/R-CRAN-rgdal/ -- I?aki ?car

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

...using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > > b"<html><body><h1>504 Gateway Time-out</h1>\nThe server didn't > respond in time.\n</body></html>\n" Maybe it's due to the size of the update? File an issue here: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues -- I?aki ?car

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 10:47, Tim Taylor <tim.taylor at hiddenelephants.co.uk> wrote: > > I've just updated to R 4.0.2 but am unsure how to get packages from the > COPR repository to update to those built under the new version of R. > FI - I'm not currently using CoprManager just trying to update/install from > terminal. The Copr repo has been rebuilt under R 4.0.2.

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user > had problems updating R 4.0.2: > > "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users at lists.fedoraproject.org/ > thread/2FFST3GWZCNM45SX53VKB255TO4LOV4C/ I don't follow t...

Hi all, We are excited to announce that this new feature is coming to Fedora 33, which is in beta state. See [1] or [2] for more information on how to test it. [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/fedora/ [2] https://www.enchufa2.es/archives/switch-blas-lapack-without-leaving-your-r-session.html Regards, -- I?aki ?car